Journals / International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education / 2014 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

A Review of Early Numeracy Interventions for Children at Risk in Mathematics

Pages
25–54
Publication Date
2015-07-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that different types of instructional design features, including explicit instruction, computer-assisted instruction (CAI), game playing, or the use of concrete- representational-abstract levels in representations of math concepts, led to improvements in mathematics performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz This study reviewed early numeracy interventions for four- to seven-year-old children at risk for mathematics difficulties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The search yielded 19 peer-reviewed studies with pre- and post-treatment control designs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that different types of instructional design features, including explicit instruction, computer-assisted instruction (CAI), game playing, or the use of concrete- representational-abstract levels in representations of math concepts, led to improvements in mathematics performance.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler At-risk children · early numeracy · intervention

Özet

Öz This study reviewed early numeracy interventions for four- to seven-year-old children at risk for mathematics difficulties. The search yielded 19 peer-reviewed studies with pre- and post-treatment control designs. The interventions were categorised as either core or supplemental instruction. The study analysed the effectiveness and identified the pedagogical components of the interventions: setting, duration, numeracy content used for intervention training and progress measurement, conductor and professional developmental support offered, and instructional design features. The interventions showed, to various degrees, the promising effect of improving the early numeracy skills of at-risk children. Results indicated that different types of instructional design features, including explicit instruction, computer-assisted instruction (CAI), game playing, or the use of concrete- representational-abstract levels in representations of math concepts, led to improvements in mathematics performance. The paper discusses the implications for practise and suggestions for future research. Key Words: At-risk children, early numeracy, intervention, mathematics, review.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mononen, R., Aunio, P., Koponen, T., Aro, M. (2015). A Review of Early Numeracy Interventions for Children at Risk in Mathematics. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 25–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/137881

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Anthony, G. & Walshaw, M. (2009). Effective pedagogy in mathematics. Educational practices series -19. Belgium: International Academy of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ Publications/Educational_Practices/EdPractices_19.pdf. Arnold, D. H., Fisher, P. H., Doctoroff, G. L., & Dobbs, J. (2002). Accelerating mathdevelopment in head start classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 762–770. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.4.762. Aubrey, C., Dahl, S., & Godfrey, R. (2006). Early mathematics development and later achievement: Further evidence. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 27–46.
  2. Aunio, P., Hautamäki, J., Sajaniemi, N., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2009). Early numeracy in low-performing young children. British Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 25–46. doi:10.1080/01411920802041822 Aunio, P., Hautamäki, J., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2005). Mathematical thinking intervention programmes for preschool children with normal and low number sense. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(2), 131–146. doi:10.1080/08856250500055578. Aunio, P. & Niemivirta, M. (2010). Predicting children's mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 427– 435. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699–713.
  3. Baker, S., Gersten, R., and Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51–73.
  4. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Hughes Pfannelstiel, K., Porterfield, J., & Gersten, R. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78(1), 7–23.
  5. Bryant, D. P., Roberts, G., Bryant, B. R., & DiAndreth-Elkins, L. (2011). Tier 2 early numeracy number sense interventions for kindergarten and first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. In R. Gersten & R. Newman-Gonchar (Eds.), Understanding RTI in mathematics. Proven methods and applications (pp. 65– 83). Baltimore, ML: Brookes. Chard, D. J., Baker, S. K., Clarke, B., Jungjohann, K., Davis, K., & Smolkowski, K. (2008). Preventing early mathematics difficulties: The feasibility of a rigorous kindergarten mathematics curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 11–20.
  6. Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Baker, S. K., Fi