Journals / International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education / 2015 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The Use Of Video Modeling With The Picture Exchange Communication System To Increase Independent Communicative Initiations In Preschoolers With Autism

Pages
316–342
Publication Date
2016-01-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An Ipad was used for providing the video model recordings to the participant children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz In the present study, the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of video modeling (VM) alone and VM procedure with the picture exchange communication system (PECS) procedures were compared in order to increase independent communicative initiations in preschool-age students will be evaluated in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An alternating treatments design was used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An Ipad was used for providing the video model recordings to the participant children.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Autism · Alternative and Augmentive Communication · Video Modeling

Özet

Öz In the present study, the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of video modeling (VM) alone and VM procedure with the picture exchange communication system (PECS) procedures were compared in order to increase independent communicative initiations in preschool-age students will be evaluated in this study. An alternating treatments design was used in the study. The three participants were diagnosed with autism and they are preschool children. All participants were attending to the Unit for Children with Developmental Disabilities in the Research Institute for the Handicapped. The dependent variable is the number of independent initiations made by the student. Independent variables are using the first phase of PECS alone and using the first phase of PECS together with video modeling. The period of experiment consist of baseline, training, post training, and maintenance, sessions. Generalization data was collected during training sessions. In each session, two trainers were take place; one is communicative partner and the other is physical prompter. Besides, in order to collect generalization data, once in every three sessions mothers of participants will attend sessions as the communicative partner or physical prompter. For preparing the video model recordings, a preschool child without special needs was used. An Ipad was used for providing the video model recordings to the participant children.

🔖

Cite This Article

Odluyurt, S., DEGİRMENCİ, H. D., Adalioglu, I., Kapan, A. (2016). The Use Of Video Modeling With The Picture Exchange Communication System To Increase Independent Communicative Initiations In Preschoolers With Autism. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 316–342. https://ajindex.com/articles/137827

References (10)

  1. Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2009). Applied Behavior Analysis For Teachers (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. Alexander, J. L., Ayres, K. M., Smith, K. A., Shepley, S. B., ve Mataras, T. K. (2013). Using video modeling on an iPad to teach generalized matching on a sorting mail task to adolescents with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(11), 1346-1357.
  2. Alzrayer, N., Banda, D. R., ve Koul, R. K. (2014). Use of iPad/iPods with Individuals with Autism and other Developmental Disabilities: A Meta-analysis of Communication Interventions. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1-13.
  3. Ayres, K. M., ve Langone, J. (2005). Intervention and instruction with video for students with autism: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(2), 183-196.
  4. Barnes, C. S., Dunning, J. L., ve Rehfeldt, R. A. (2011). An evaluation of strategies for training staff to implement the picture exchange communication system. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(4), 1574-1583.
  5. Bellini, S., ve Akullian, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 264-287.
  6. Bereznak, S., Ayres, K. M., Mechling, L. C., ve Alexander, J. L. (2012). Video self-prompting and mobile technology to increase daily living and vocational independence for students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24(3), 269-285.
  7. Bidwell, M. A., ve Rehfeldt, R. A. (2004). Using video modeling to teach a domestic skill with an embedded social skill to adults with severe mental retardation. Behavioral Interventions, 19(4), 263-274.
  8. Boesch, M. C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., ve Hsu, N. (2013). Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(3), 480-493.
  9. Bondy, A. S. (2001). PECS: Potential benefits and risks. The Behavior Analyst Today, 2(2), 12. Bondy, A. S.,ve Frost, L. A. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 9(3), 1-19.
  10. Burton, C. E., Anderson, D. H., Prater, M. A., ve Dyches, T. T. (2013). Video self-modeling on an iPad to teach functional math skills to adolescents with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 1088357613478829. Car