SavedAdd your journal

Journals / CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

Attitudes of Sport Sciences Students Toward the Use of Humour in Education

Spor Bilimleri Öğrencilerinin Eğitimde Mizah Kullanımına Yönelik Tutumları

Zekai Çakır(BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7719-1031
Pages
375–398
Publication Date
2026-07-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that female participants showed more positive attitudes than males.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines pre-service physical education teachers' attitudes toward using humour in education based on various demographic variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Significant differences were found according to participants' gender, level of physical activity, daily use of humour, family humour climate, academic department, and year of study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that female participants showed more positive attitudes than males.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eğitimde mizah · Spor · Öğrenci tutumları

Abstract

This study examines pre-service physical education teachers' attitudes toward using humour in education based on various demographic variables. Significant differences were found according to participants' gender, level of physical activity, daily use of humour, family humour climate, academic department, and year of study. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27 through t-tests, ANOVA, and Cohen's d. The reliability of the attitude scale was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha of .842. The findings indicate that female participants showed more positive attitudes than males. Likewise, individuals who exercise regularly, use humour in daily life and were raised in urban environments exhibited more favourable attitudes toward educational humour. Those interested in team sports also demonstrated more positive attitudes than individual sports participants. A clear trend was observed in which attitudes improved as academic levels increased. These results highlight humour's pedagogical value in the classroom, including enhancing attention, reducing anxiety, improving motivation, and strengthening interaction. Therefore, teacher education programs should integrate content aimed at the ethical and constructive use of humour. The study concludes that humour is a multifaceted instructional tool influenced by individual and contextual factors.

Özet

Bu araştırma, Beden eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının eğitimde mizah kullanımına yönelik tutumlarını çeşitli demografik değişkenler doğrultusunda incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmaya katılan öğretmen adaylarının cinsiyet, spor yapma durumu, mizah kullanma alışkanlığı, aile ortamındaki mizah algısı, öğrenim gördükleri bölüm ve sınıf düzeyine göre tutumlarında anlamlı farklılıklar tespit edilmiştir. Veriler SPSS 27 programında t-testi, ANOVA ve Cohen’s d analizleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. Ölçeğin Cronbach’s Alpha katsayısı ,802’dir. Bulgular, kadın öğretmen adaylarının mizaha yönelik tutumlarının erkeklere kıyasla daha olumlu olduğunu; düzenli spor yapan, mizahı günlük yaşamında kullanan ve şehir merkezinde büyümüş bireylerin ise eğitsel mizahı daha olumlu değerlendirdiğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca, takım sporlarına ilgi duyan bireylerin bireysel sporlarla ilgilenenlere göre mizaha karşı daha yüksek tutum sergiledikleri bulunmuştur. Öğrenim düzeyi ilerledikçe mizaha yönelik tutumlarda artış gözlemlenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, mizahın sınıf içi öğrenme süreçlerinde dikkat çekme, kaygı azaltma, motivasyonu artırma ve etkileşimi güçlendirme gibi önemli pedagojik işlevler üstlendiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, öğretmen adaylarının mizahı etik, duyarlı ve yapıcı biçimde kullanabilmeleri için formasyon programlarında mizah odaklı içeriklere yer verilmesi önerilmektedir. Araştırma, mizahın bireysel farklılıklarla şekillenen çok boyutlu bir öğretim aracı olduğunu vurgulayarak, eğitimde mizah kullanımına yönelik daha kapsamlı çalışmaların gerekliliğine işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çakır, Z. (2026). Attitudes of Sport Sciences Students Toward the Use of Humour in Education. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 375–398. https://doi.org/10.33459/cbubesbd.1691038

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (72)

  1. Altın, M., & Demir, H. (2019). A study of humour differences in university students doing and not doing sport. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 8(1), 149–158.
  2. Aslan, H. (2006). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin öğrenilmiş güçlülük düzeylerine ve cinsiyetlerine göre mizah tarzlarının incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. TezNo: 206080
  3. Bakar, F., & Kumar, V. (2023). How students perceive the teacher’s use of humour and how it enhances learning in the classroom. The European Journal of Humour Research, 10(4), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2022.10.4.656
  4. Balta, E. E. (2016). Eğitimde mizahın kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen tutumları. İlköğretim Online, 15(4), 1268–1269. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/226995
  5. Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. J. (2011). A review of humour in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.496867
  6. Berk, R. A. (2013). Humour as an instructional defibrillator: Evidence-based techniques in teaching and assessment. Stylus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003445197
  7. Bieg, S., & Dresel, M. (2018). Relevance of perceived teacher humour types for instruction and student learning. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9428-z
  8. Bieg, S., Dresel, M., Goetz, T., & Net, U.E. (2022). Teachers’ enthusiasm and humour and its lagged relationships with students’ enjoyment and boredom: A latent trait–state approach. Learning and Instruction, 81, Article 101579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101579
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (11. baskı). Pegem.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
  11. Campbell, L., Martin, R. A., & Ward, J. R. (2008). An observational study of humour use while resolving conflict in dating couples. Personal Relationships, 15(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00183.x
  12. Çelik, S. (2020). Personality and humour styles of university students. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 9(10), 157–167.
  13. Chen, G. M., & Martin, R. A. (2007). A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students. International Journal of Humour Research, 20(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2007.011
  14. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  15. Dakwo, P. E., Cerkez, Y., & Baysen, E. (2023). The effect of humor styles on anxiety performance in basketball learning practices. Sage Open, 13(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231218901
  16. Derks, P., & Berkowitz, J. (1989). Some determinants of attitudes toward a joker. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 2(4), 385–396.
  17. Davis, J. M. (2013). Humour and its cultural context: Introduction and overview. In J. M. Davis & J. Chey (Eds.), Humour in Chinese life and culture: Resistance and control in modern times (pp. 1–22). Hong Kong University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789888268054-005
  18. Edwards, C. N., & Jones, R. L. (2018). Humour in sports coaching: ‘it’s a funny old game’. Sociological Research Online, 23(4), 744-762. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418780047
  19. Fei, X., Hamilton, G. G., & Zheng, W. (1992). From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. University of California.
  20. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage.
  21. Freud, S. (1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious (J. Strachey, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1905)
  22. Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). “What’s in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509378996
  23. Gallivan, J. (1992). Group differences in appreciation of feminist humour. Humour, 5(4), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1992.5.4.369
  24. Garner, R. L. (2006). Humour in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha!. College Teaching, 54(1), 177–180. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180
  25. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2024). IBM SPSS statistics 29 step by step: A simple guide and reference (18th ed.). Routledge
  26. Ghorbani, S., Ghasemi, P., Mainer-Pardos, E., Roso-Moliner, A., Lozano, D., & Nobari, H. (2025). Effects of humor in physical education on enjoyment, intention to physical activity, and school happiness in primary school students. Physical Activity in Children, 2(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.61882/pach.2025.505796.1045
  27. Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers' use of humour in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378786
  28. Graham, E. E., Papa, M. J., & Brooks, G. P. (1992). Functions of humour in conversation: Conceptualization and measurement. Western Journal of Communication, 56(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319209374409
  29. Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2013). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. Pearson.
  30. Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan (Original work published 1651). Oxford University Press.
  31. Hovelynck, J., & Peeters, L. (2003). Laughter, smiles and grins: The role of humor in learning and facilitating. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 3(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729670385200351
  32. Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944–974. https://doi.org/10.1086/228588
  33. Jeder, D. (2015). Implications of using humour in the classroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 828–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.218
  34. Jiang, T., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2019). Cultural differences in humour perception, usage, and implications: A comparison between Chinese and Western perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123
  35. Johnson, A. M. (1991). Sex differences in the jokes college students tell. Psychological Reports, 68(3), 851–854. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3.851
  36. Judge, L. W., Dolon, R., Livergood, K., & Evans, B. (2024). Laughter in the locker room: Unlocking high performance through humour in coaching. The Physical Educator, 81(4), 381-396.
  37. Karasar, N. (2007). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (19. baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  38. Kuiper, N. A., Grimshaw, M., Leite, C., & Kirsh, G. (2004). Humour is not always the best medicine: Specific components of sense of humour and psychological well-being. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 17(1–2), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.002
  39. Loizou, E., Recchia, S.L. (2019). Young Children’s Humor. In: Loizou, E., Recchia, S.L. (eds) Research on Young Children’s Humor. Educating the Young Child, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15202-4_1
  40. Lu, J. G. (2023). Cultural differences in humour: A systematic review and critique. Current Opinion in Psychology, 53, Article 101690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101690
  41. Lynch, O. H. (2002). Humourous communication: Finding a place for humour in communication research. Communication Theory, 12(4), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00277.x
  42. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  43. Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humour: An integrative approach. Elsevier Academic Press.
  44. Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. (2018). The psychology of humour: An integrative approach. Academic Press.
  45. Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humour as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6), 1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1313
  46. Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humour as a double‐edged sword: Four functions of humour in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x
  47. Morreall, J. (1983). Taking laughter seriously. SUNY Press.
  48. Neff, P., & Dewaele, J. M. (2023). Humour strategies in the foreign language class. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(3), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2088761
  49. Ngai, C. S. B., Singh, R. G., Huang, Y., Ho, J. W. Y., Khong, M. L., Chan, E., Lau, T. C. K., Chan, H. Y. E., Wong, W. T., Law, M. S. M., & Koon, A. C. (2025). Development of a systematic humour pedagogical framework to enhance student learning outcomes across different disciplines in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6, Article 100438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100438
  50. Safaei, M.A., Safania, A., Nikbakhsh, R., & Farahani, A. (2024). Investigating humour and team cohesion in sports environments. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(1), 404–414.
  51. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS (2nd ed.). Allen & Unwin.
  52. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  53. Ruch, W. (2008). Psychology of humour. In V. Raskin (Ed.), The primer of humour research (pp. 17–100). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198492.17
  54. Şahin, A. (2021). Humour use in school settings: The perceptions of teachers. SAGE Open, 11(2).1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211022691
  55. Samson, A. C., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Humour as emotion regulation: The differential consequences of negative versus positive humour. Cognition & Emotion, 26(2), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.585069
  56. Schei, G. S., Haugen, T., Stenling, A., Grøtting, A., Peters, D. M., & Høigaard, R. (2021). Development and initial validation of the humor climate in sport scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 692892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692892
  57. Schmidt, S., & Williams, A. (2001). Memory for humourous cartoons. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194924
  58. Snyder, E. E. (1991). Sociology of sport and humour. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 26(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/101269029102600204
  59. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  60. Tavşancıl, E. (2006). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (2. baskı). Nobel Yayın
  61. Tod, D., Hodge, K., & Krane, V. (2023). Routledge handbook of applied sport psychology. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173588
  62. Torok, S. E., McMorris, R. F., & Lin, W. C. (2004). Is humour an appreciated teaching tool? Perceptions of professors’ teaching styles and use of humour. College Teaching, 52(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.52.1.14-20
  63. Wanzer, M. B., & Frymier, A. B. (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humour and students’ reports of learning. Communication Education, 48(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379152
  64. Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An Explanation of the Relationship between Instructor Humor and Student Learning: Instructional Humor Processing Theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903367238
  65. Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., Wojtaszczyk, A. M., & Smith, T. (2006). Appropriate and inappropriate uses of humor by teachers. Communication Education, 55(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600566132
  66. Yaprak, P., Güçlü, M., & Ayyildiz Durhan, T. (2018). The happiness, hardiness, and humour styles of students with a bachelor’s degree in sport sciences. Behavioral Sciences, 8(9), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8090082
  67. Yue, X. D., Liu, K. W.-Y., Jiang, F., & Hiranandani, N. A. (2014). Humor styles, self-esteem, and subjective happiness. Psychological Reports, 115(2), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.02.PR0.115c18z6
  68. Zhou, W., & Choi, J. L. (2025). Teaching and learning with instructional humour: A review of five decades of research and further direction. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1445362
  69. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1991). Responding to comedy: The sense and nonsense in humour. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 261–279). Erlbaum.
  70. Zillmann, D., & Cantor, R. (1976). A disposition theory of humour and mirth. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humour and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 93–115). Wiley.
  71. Zillmann, D., & Stocking, S. H. (1976). Putdown humour. Journal of Communication, 26(3), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01919.x
  72. Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humour: Experiment and replication. The Journal of Experimental Education, 57(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1988.10806492