Journals / International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education / 2014 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Pivotal Response Teaching for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: An Overview*

Pages
221–246
Publication Date
2015-07-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Pivotal response teaching, evidence-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, the increasing of number of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder has led to the diversity in interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This diversity of interventions has brought forward evidence-based interventions, which is used in the education of children with autism spectrum disorder.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Pivotal response teaching, evidence-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Temel tepki öğretimi · bilimsel dayanaklı uygulamalar · otizm spektrum bozukluğu

Abstract

In recent years, the increasing of number of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder has led to the diversity in interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. This diversity of interventions has brought forward evidence-based interventions, which is used in the education of children with autism spectrum disorder. Pivotal response teaching is one of the evidence-based interventions, which is used in the education of children with autism spectrum disorder. The purpose of this current study is to depict the pivotal response teaching, explain the general characteristics of pivotal response teaching, and provide information about how to plan a training session, which is carried out using pivotal response teaching. Keywords: Pivotal response teaching, evidence-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder.

Özet

Son yıllarda, otizm spektrum bozukluğu tanısı alan çocukların sayısının giderek artması, otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocuklara yönelik uygulamalarda da çeşitliliğe neden olmuştur. Uygulamadaki bu çeşitlilikler, otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocukların eğitimlerinde kullanılan bilimsel dayanaklı uygulamaları gündeme getirmiştir. Otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocukların eğitiminde kullanılan bilimsel dayanaklı uygulamalardan birisi temel tepki öğretimidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; temel tepki öğretimini tanımlamak, genel özelliklerini açıklamak ve temel tepki öğretimi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilecek bir öğretim oturumunun nasıl planlanacağı hakkında bilgi vermektir

🔖

Cite This Article

Genç, G. B., ÖZKAN, Ş. Y. (2015). Pivotal Response Teaching for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: An Overview*. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 221–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/137815

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Bakeman, R. & Adamson, L.B. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Development, 55(4), 1278-1289.
  2. Baker, B. L. (1989). Parent Training and Developmental Disabilities. Monographs of the American Association on Mental Retardation, 13. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation. Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 21(3), 205-226.
  3. Bellini, S., Peters, J. K., Benner, L., & Hopf, A. (2007). A meta-analysis of school-based social skills interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28(3), 153-162.
  4. Bird, F., Dores, P. A., Moniz, D., & Robinson, J. (1989). Reducing severe aggressive and self-injurious behaviors with functional communication training. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 37-48. Breen C. G. & Harring, T.G. (1991). Effects of contextual dependence on social initiations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 337-347.
  5. Browder, D. M. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilities. The Guilford Press:
  6. New York. Brown, F. & Cohen, S. (1996). Self-determination and young children. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 22-30.
  7. Burke, J. C. & Cerniglia, L. (1990). Stimulus complexity and autistic children’s responsivity: assessing and training a pivotal behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 233-253. Camarata, (1996). On the importance of integrating naturalistic language, social intervention, and speech intelligibility training. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficulty behavior in the community (pp.333-351). Baltimore: Paul H.Brookes Publishing Co. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2012/p0329_autism_disorder.html web adresinden 18.05.2013 tarihinde erişilmiştir. Charlop, M. H. & Trasowech, J. E. (1991). Increasing autistic children’s spontaneous verbalizations of affection: an assessment of time delay and peer-mediated procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 307-314.
  8. Cowan, R. J. & Allen, K. D. (2007). Using naturalistic procedures to enhance learning in ındividuals with autism: A focus o