Journals / International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Parents’ ideal type approaches to early education pathways: life stories from Sweden.

Pages
64–79
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study has relevance for preschool and preschool class teachers, special educators, policy-makers and researchers in inclusive and special education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz In this study, parents told their story about their children; their children’s preschool and preschool class; their children’s educational transitions; and their own cooperation with staff.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The views of parents (N=27) were collected by way of life story interviews.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study has relevance for preschool and preschool class teachers, special educators, policy-makers and researchers in inclusive and special education.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler parents’ views · bioecological content analysis · preschool

Özet

Öz In this study, parents told their story about their children; their children’s preschool and preschool class; their children’s educational transitions; and their own cooperation with staff. The views of parents (N=27) were collected by way of life story interviews. The bioecological model for human development was adopted as a theoretical, conceptual and analytical frame. A qualitative bioecological content analysis and a quantitative content analysis were performed. More than half of the children were described as typical in terms of development, while a few were described as being gifted and talented by their parents, and about a third had special educational needs. More preschools than preschool classes were considered to be high in quality, and more preschool-home collaboration than preschool class-home collaboration was felt to be high in quality. The following ideal type approaches of the parents emerged: (1) involved and concerned parents; (2) involved but unconcerned parents; and (3) uninvolved and unconcerned parents. The number of involved and concerned parents increased from preschool to preschool class. This study has relevance for preschool and preschool class teachers, special educators, policy-makers and researchers in inclusive and special education.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANDSTRÖM, M., LUNDQVİST, J., AXELSSON, A. (2019). Parents’ ideal type approaches to early education pathways: life stories from Sweden.. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 64–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/137782

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Achanfuo Yeboah, D. (2002). Enhancing transition from early childhood phase to primary education: Evidence from the research literature. Early Years, 22(1), 51–68.
  2. Ackesjö, H. (2014). Barns övergångar till och från förskoleklass: Gränser, identiteter och (dis-) kontinuiteter [Children’s transitions to and from preschool class. Borders, identities and (dis-)continuities)]. Avhandling, Linnéuniversitetet, Kalmar. Ahtola, A., Björn, P. M., Turunen, T., Poikonen, P-L., Kontoniemi, M., Lerkkanen, M-K., & Nurmi, J-E. (2016). The concordance between teachers’ and parents’ perceptions of school transition practices: A solid base for the future. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(2), 168-181.
  3. Alatalo, T., Meier, J., & Frank, E. (2016). Transition between Swedish preschool and preschool class: A question about interweaving care and knowledge. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(2), 155-167).
  4. Axelsson, A., Lundqvist, J., & Sandström, M. (2017). Tre mammor berättar om sina barns tid i förskola och förskoleklass samt övergången däremellan [Three mothers describe their children’s life in preschool and preschool class as well as the transition between these school forms]. I A. Garpelin & A. Sandberg (Eds.), Barn och unga i skola och samhälle [Children and youth in school and society]. MSES: Mälardalen Studies in Educational Sciences, No. 31, 28-51.
  5. Beneventi, A. (2016). The Annemarie Roeper Method of Qualitative Assessment: My journey, Roeper Review, 38(4), 252-257.
  6. Bertaux, D. (1981). Introduction. In D. Bertaux (Ed.), Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences (pp. 5-15). SAGE: Studies in International Sociology. Beverly Hills. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models for human development (5th ed., pp. 993-1028). New York: John Wiley. Ekström, K., Garpelin, A., & Kallberg, P. (2008). Övergångar under förskoleåren som kritiska händelser för barnet, föräldrarna och verksamheten – en forskningsöversikt [Preschool transitions: critical events for children, parents and the organisation]. Tidskrift för lärarutbildning och forskning, 15(1), 45–61.
  8. Garpelin, A. (2014). Transition to school: A rite of passage in life. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petri