Journals / The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of L1 on the Production of L2 Formulaic Expressions

Pages
34–48
Publication Date
2016-07-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study suggest that explicit instruction and comparison of any category of idioms can promote its production, but also that EFL learners are more comfortable working with Category II idioms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores whether formulaic expressions congruent to the ones in an individual's native language (L1) have an effect on the production those expressions and their respective contexts in that individual's second language (L2).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fifteen EFL students were given a pre- and post-Discourse Completion Test and a Writing Prompt to assess their improvement in producing English idioms and their contexts after a workshop that focused on idioms of varying similarity to the participants' L1: Category I, word-for-word translations of the idiom used in L1; Category II, conceptually similar versions of the idiom used in L1; and Category III, idioms specific to the L2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study suggest that explicit instruction and comparison of any category of idioms can promote its production, but also that EFL learners are more comfortable working with Category II idioms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:EFL · TESOL · Formulaic Expressions

Abstract

This study explores whether formulaic expressions congruent to the ones in an individual's native language (L1) have an effect on the production those expressions and their respective contexts in that individual's second language (L2). Fifteen EFL students were given a pre- and post-Discourse Completion Test and a Writing Prompt to assess their improvement in producing English idioms and their contexts after a workshop that focused on idioms of varying similarity to the participants' L1: Category I, word-for-word translations of the idiom used in L1; Category II, conceptually similar versions of the idiom used in L1; and Category III, idioms specific to the L2. The results of the study suggest that explicit instruction and comparison of any category of idioms can promote its production, but also that EFL learners are more comfortable working with Category II idioms.

🔖

Cite This Article

Pfeiffer, K., Ortactepe, D., Corlu, S. (2016). The Effect of L1 on the Production of L2 Formulaic Expressions. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 34–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/137711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Bahns, J., & Eldaw, M. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocation? System, 21(1), 104-114.
  2. Bannard, C., & Lieven, E. (2012). Formulaic language in L1 acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 3-16.
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Vellenga, H. E. (2012). The effect of instruction on conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. System, 40, 77-89.
  4. Bobrow, S., & Bell, S. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory and Cognition, 1, 343-346.
  5. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Resource, 10(3), 245-261.
  6. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83-110.
  7. Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668-683.
  8. Cutting, J., & Bock, K. (1997). That's why the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory & Cognition, 25, 57-71.
  9. Hama, H. Q. (2010). Major sources of collocational errors made by EFL learners at Koya University. (Unpublished Master's). Bilkent University, Ankara,
  10. Turkey. Kecskes, I. (2007). Formulaic language in English lingua franca. In I. Kecskes, & L. R. Horn (Eds.), Explorations in pragmatics (pp. 191-219). Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. Liu, D. (2003). The most frequently used spoken American English idioms. A corpus analysis and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 671-700.
  11. Meunier, F. (2012). Formulaic language and language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 111-129.
  12. Myles, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (1999). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning, 48(3), 323-363.
  13. Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223-242.
  14. Sprenger, S., Levelt, W., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161-184.
  15. Swinney, D. & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523-534.
  16. Truscott, K. (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14(2), 103-135.
  17. Wood, D. (2006). Uses and functions of fo