SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Development of Baler Machine for Humid Areas

Tugba Karaköse(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-1725-7027
Kemal Çağatay Selvi(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-9133-5046
Pages
163–167
Publication Date
2024-03-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

DM clogging problems have not been observed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Baler machines collect the swath straw when it reaches a sufficient level of moisture and bale it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In terms of direct usability, feed with particle size distribution smaller than 15 cm was 93.20% for the developed machine (DM) and 89.43% for the baler machine (BM-1).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:DM clogging problems have not been observed.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Baler machine · Stubble chopper unit · Square straw bale

Abstract

Baler machines collect the swath straw when it reaches a sufficient level of moisture and bale it. However, the drying time of the material is prolonged in humid regions. This causes the land not to be used for the second crop and to get wet again in case of rainfall. Clogging is observed in commonly used baling machines when baling these products because they are more humid. The study aims to collect and bale the material even if the straw is not sufficiently dried in humid areas. For this purpose, dimensional improvements were made in the stubble chopper unit of a baler and compared with two widely used machines in the country. While clogging was observed in the other machine, no clogging was observed in the improved machine. In terms of direct usability, feed with particle size distribution smaller than 15 cm was 93.20% for the developed machine (DM) and 89.43% for the baler machine (BM-1). DM clogging problems have not been observed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karaköse, T., Selvi, K. Ç. (2024). Development of Baler Machine for Humid Areas. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1401132

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Afify MT, Bahnasawy AH, Ali SA. 2002. Effect of rice straw picking up method on the performance of a rectangular baler. The AIC 2002 Meeting CASE/SCGR program Saskatoon, July 14-17, Saskatchewan, Canada, pp: 14-17.
  2. Afify MT, Bahnasawy AH, Ali SA. 2005. Effect of rice straw feeding on the performance of rectangular baler. Egypt J Agri Engin, 22(2): 380-403.
  3. Akyıldız A.R. 1986. Yemler bilgisi ve teknolojisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, no:974, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 32.
  4. Bitra VS, Womac AR, Yang YT, Miu PI, Igathinathane C, Chevanan N, Sokhansanj S. 2011. Characterization of wheat straw particle size distributions as affected by knife mill operating factors. Biomass Bioen, 35(8): 3674-3686.
  5. El-Danasory MM, Imbabi AT. 1998. Study of mechanical and manual pickup and baling of wheat straw after harvesting with combine. Egypt J Agri Engin,15(2): 246-260.
  6. Görgülü M, Göncü S, Serbester U, Kıyma Z. 2011. Süt sığırlarının üremesinde beslemenin rolü. 7. Ulusal Zootekni Bilim Kongresi, 14-16 Eylül, Adana, Türkiye, ss: 9-39.
  7. Güner M, Keskin R. 2011. Hasat harman makinaları. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, no:302, Ankara, Türkiye, ss: 98-100.
  8. Haselmann A, Zehetgruber K, Fuerst-Waltl B, Zollitsch W, Knaus W, Zebeli Q. 2019. Feeding forages with reduced particle size in a total mixed ration improves feed intake total-tract digestibility and performance of organic dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 102(10): 8839-8849.
  9. Lammers B. P, Buckmaster D. R, Heinrichs A. J. 1996. A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forage and total mixed rations. J Dairy Sci, 79(5): 922-928.
  10. Mangaraj S, Kulkarni S. D. 2011. Field straw management–a techno economic perspectives. J Insti Engin, 8(1-2): 153-159.
  11. Ülger P. 1982. Tarımsal makinaların ilkeleri ve projeleme esasları. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, no:605, Ankara, Türkiye, ss: 312.
  12. Suardi A, Stefanoni W, Bergonzoli S, Latterini F, Jonsson N, Pari L. 2020. Comparison between two strategies for the collection of wheat residue after mechanical harvesting: Performance and cost analysis. Sustainability, 12(12): 4936.
  13. Verma K, Shrivastava A, Gautam A. K. 2019. Performance evaluation of tractor drawn round straw baler for paddy. Pharma Innov J, 8: 846-849.
  14. Yalçın H Çakmak B. 2005. Bazı kaba yemlerin sıkıştırılabilirlik özellikleri. Ege Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi Kesin Raporu Proje 2005 01-ZRF:42, İzmir, Türkiye, ss: 125.