SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4

Assessment of Larval Density and Damage by Lepidopteran Species Complex in Some Sweet and Dent Maize Cultivars in Hatay Province

İbrahim Ersin Bozdoğan(HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0002-9841-9744
Nihat Demirel(Hatay Mustafa Kemal University)0000-0002-3631-2458
Ömer Konuşkan(HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0003-1135-2346
Hatice Asil(HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0003-3645-5309
Pages
548–555
Publication Date
2025-07-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed significant differences in larval infestation and damage among maize varieties and cropping seasons.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to evaluate the larval density and the complex damage caused by lepidopteran species on different maize (Zea mays L.) varieties grown as main- and second -crops in Hatay Province, Türkiye, during the 2024 growing season.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Six maize varieties namely; P1541, Overland, Merit, Sherbet, Capella, and Agromar DS 0224 were cultivated under natural field conditions without using pest control measurements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed significant differences in larval infestation and damage among maize varieties and cropping seasons.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Maize · Lepidoptera · Varieties

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the larval density and the complex damage caused by lepidopteran species on different maize (Zea mays L.) varieties grown as main- and second -crops in Hatay Province, Türkiye, during the 2024 growing season. Six maize varieties namely; P1541, Overland, Merit, Sherbet, Capella, and Agromar DS 0224 were cultivated under natural field conditions without using pest control measurements. Weekly larval sampling and damage assessments were conducted using the FAO W-sampling method, focusing on larval density, damage to leaves, stems, and cobs, and the number of feeding galleries. Results showed significant differences in larval infestation and damage among maize varieties and cropping seasons. In case of main-crop, larval density increased gradually over the sampling period, with P1541 exhibiting the highest average infestation (0.47 larvae/plant) and damage levels across leaves, stems, and cobs. P1541 also had the greatest number of feeding galleries and damaged plants (31.16%). Conversely, Sherbet variety displayed the lowest larval density and damage, indicating strong resistance traits. In case of second-crop, overall larval densities were found higher and more variable. P1541 again showed the highest maximum larval density (2.93 larvae/plant) and severe leaf and cob damage. Interestingly, Agromar DS 0224 recorded the highest stem damage and number of feeding galleries. Damage rates in P1541 reached 80.28%, significantly surpassing those in Agromar DS 0224 (64.00%), which demonstrated relatively better resistance under second-crop conditions. These findings underline the importance of varietal susceptibility and sowing time in pest pressure dynamics. Sowing time and varietal differences shown a significant influence on the extent of damage caused by the lepidopteran complex. This is consistent with earlier research highlighting the role of host plant resistance and environmental factors—such as crop phenology—as major determinants of pest infestation levels. By evaluating varietal performance under natural infestation conditions, this study offers valuable insights that can forecast the future integrated pest management strategies particularly, in the selection of suitable crop varieties.

Özet

This study aimed to evaluate the larval density and the complex damage caused by lepidopteran species on different maize (Zea mays L.) varieties grown as main- and second -crops in Hatay Province, Türkiye, during the 2024 growing season. Six maize varieties namely; P1541, Overland, Merit, Sherbet, Capella, and Agromar DS 0224 were cultivated under natural field conditions without using pest control measurements. Weekly larval sampling and damage assessments were conducted using the FAO W-sampling method, focusing on larval density, damage to leaves, stems, and cobs, and the number of feeding galleries. Results showed significant differences in larval infestation and damage among maize varieties and cropping seasons. In case of main-crop, larval density increased gradually over the sampling period, with P1541 exhibiting the highest average infestation (0.47 larvae/plant) and damage levels across leaves, stems, and cobs. P1541 also had the greatest number of feeding galleries and damaged plants (31.16%). Conversely, Sherbet variety displayed the lowest larval density and damage, indicating strong resistance traits. In case of second-crop, overall larval densities were found higher and more variable. P1541 again showed the highest maximum larval density (2.93 larvae/plant) and severe leaf and cob damage. Interestingly, Agromar DS 0224 recorded the highest stem damage and number of feeding galleries. Damage rates in P1541 reached 80.28%, significantly surpassing those in Agromar DS 0224 (64.00%), which demonstrated relatively better resistance under second-crop conditions. These findings underline the importance of varietal susceptibility and sowing time in pest pressure dynamics. Sowing time and varietal differences shown a significant influence on the extent of damage caused by the lepidopteran complex. This is consistent with earlier research highlighting the role of host plant resistance and environmental factors—such as crop phenology—as major determinants of pest infestation levels. By evaluating varietal performance under natural infestation conditions, this study offers valuable insights that can forecast the future integrated pest management strategies particularly, in the selection of suitable crop varieties.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bozdoğan, İ. E., Demirel, N., Konuşkan, Ö., Asil, H. (2025). Assessment of Larval Density and Damage by Lepidopteran Species Complex in Some Sweet and Dent Maize Cultivars in Hatay Province. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4, 548–555. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1706723

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Achhami B, BK S, Bhandari G. 2015. Assessment of maize stem borer damage on hybrid maize varieties in Chitwan, Nepal. J Maize Res Dev, 1: 53–63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.34293
  2. Afzal M, Bashir MH. 2007. Influence of certain leaf characters of some summer vegetables with incidence of predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae. Pak J Bot, 39(1): 205–209.
  3. Afzal M, Nazir Z, Bashir MH, Khan BS. 2009. Analysis of host plant resistance in some genotypes of maize against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). Pak J Bot, 41: 421–428.
  4. Anonymous. 2024. Hatay Provincial Directorate of Meteorology.
  5. Ayaz T, Can F. 2023. Determination of Lepidoptera species and their population densities in the maize fields of Sirnak Province, Türkiye. J Inst Sci Technol, 13(1): 64–72.
  6. Bayram A. 2003. Mısır koçankurdu, Sesamia nonagrioides Lefebvre (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)’in ekonomik zarar düzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve yumurta parazitoidi Telenomus busseolae (Gahan) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae)’nin bazı biyolojik özellikleri üzerine araştırmalar. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana, Türkiye, pp: 102.
  7. Demirel N, Konuskan O. 2017. A study on percentages of damage ratios of the European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on sweet corn cultivars. Entomol Appl Sci Lett, 4(1): 4–8. https://doi.org/10.24896/easl2017421
  8. Diabate D, Tah GTT, Ble YC, Kouakou KL, Koua HK, Kouassi NK. 2023. Evaluation of the resistance of three maize varieties to Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) and Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner in the Tonkpi region (Man, Côte d’Ivoire). Bull Natl Res Cent, 47(1): 157.
  9. FAO. 2018. Gestion intégrée de la chenille légionnaire d’automne sur le maïs. Un guide pour les champs-écoles des producteurs en Afrique. FAO, Rome, pp: 135.
  10. Gözüaçık C, Mart C, Kara K. 2007. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde mısırda zararlı Lepidoptera türlerinin doğal düşmanları ve doğal parazitlenme oranları. In: Türkiye II. Bitki Koruma Kongresi, 27–29 Ağustos, Isparta, Türkiye.
  11. Gözüaçık C. 2016. The determination of lepidopterous pest species and their distributions, densities, and damages in corn fields of Iğdır Province in Türkiye. Igdir Univ J Inst Sci Technol, 6: 45–52. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.2016119309
  12. IGCMR. 2013. International Grains Council Market Report. Available at: http://www.igc.int/downloads/gmrsummary/gmrsumme.pdf (accessed date: May 25, 2025).
  13. İkincisoy Y. 1993. Çukurova'da mısır bitkisinde zararlı Acantholeucania loreyi Dup. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)'in biyolojisi, populasyon gelişmesi ve doğal düşmanları. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana, Türkiye, pp: 69.
  14. Kara M. 1994. Çukurova'da mısır bitkisinde zararlı Pseudaletia unipuncta Haw. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)'nin biyolojisi, populasyon gelişmesi ve doğal düşmanları. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana, Türkiye, pp: 79.
  15. Kavut H. 1977. Ege Bölgesi'nde mısır ve sorgum zararlıları üzerinde faunistik, survey ve önemli olanların zararları, populasyon yoğunlukları üzerinde araştırmalar. Bornova Zirai Mücadele Araştırma Enstitüsü, İzmir, Türkiye, pp: 91.
  16. Kayapınar A, Kornoşor S. 1988. Çukurova Bölgesi'nde mısır koçankurdu'nun mevsimsel çıkışı ve populasyon gelişmesi. In: Proc Symp Corn Borers and Control Measures, 1–3 November, Adana, Türkiye, pp: 87–91.
  17. Konuşkan Ö, Ertekin İ, Can E. 2024. Yield and yield characteristics of selected grain maize varieties grown as a main crop in the Amik Plain. Int J Chem Technol, 8(2): 218–221. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1583021
  18. Kornoşor S, Kayapınar A, Sertkaya E. 1992. Akdeniz Bölgesi'nde yumurta parazitoiti, Platytelenomus busseolae Gahan (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae)'nin Sesamia nonagrioides Lef. (Lep.: Noctuidae)'in populasyonuna etkisi ve yayılış alanının belirlenmesi. Turk Entomol Derg, 16(4): 217–226.
  19. Krips OE, Kleijn PW, Willems PEL, Gols GJZ, Dicke M. 1999. Leaf hairs influence searching efficiency and predation rate of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari; Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol, 23(2): 119–131.
  20. Lodos N. 1981. Maize pests and their importance in Türkiye. EPPO Bull, 11(2): 87–89.
  21. Ortiz R, Taba S, Chávez Tovar V, Mezzalama M, Xu Y, Yan J, Crouch JH. 2010. Conserving and enhancing maize genetic resources as global public goods – A perspective from CIMMYT. Crop Sci, 50(1): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0236
  22. Ölmez M, Aslan MM, Güzel G. 2017. Kahramanmaraş ili mısır alanlarındaki zararlı Lepidopter türlerinin tespiti, popülasyon gelişimleri ve predatörlerinin saptanması. Ksu J Agric Nat, 13(1): 26–33.
  23. Pehlivan S, Atakan E. 2022. Main record of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Türkiye. Cukurova J Agric Food Sci, 37(2): 139–145. https://doi.org/10.36846/CJAFS.2022.82
  24. Rebe M, Van Den Berg J, McGeoch MA. 2004. Colonization of cultivated and indigenous graminaceous host plants by Busseola fusca (Fuller) and Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) under field conditions. Afr Entomol, 12(2): 187–199.
  25. Rosengrant M, Ringler C, Msangi S, Sulser T, Zhu T, Cline S. 2008. International model for policy analysis of agricultural commodities and trade (IMPACT): Model description. IFPRI, Washington, DC, pp: 56-64.
  26. Sertkaya E, Akmeşe V, Atay E. 2014. Main record of spotted stem borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) on maize from Türkiye. Turk Entomol Bull, 4(3): 197–200. https://doi.org/10.16969/teb.46488
  27. Sertkaya E, Kornoşor S. 1994. Çukurova’da Sesamia nonagrioides Lef.’in yumurta parazitoidi Platytelenomus busseolae Gahan’ın yaygınlığı ve doğal parazitlenme oranı üzerinde araştırmalar. In: Türkiye III. Biyolojik Mücadele Kongresi, 25–28 Ocak, İzmir, pp: 565–574.
  28. Şimşek N, Sezer C. 1983. Akdeniz Bölgesi'nde ikinci ürün olarak ekilen mısırda görülen zararlı ve faydalılar üzerinde sürvey çalışmaları. Adana Zirai Mücadele Araştırma Enstitüsü, Proje No: E/103.657, sonuç raporu, pp: 45-46.
  29. Teoman A. 1979. Güney Anadolu Bölgesi buğdaygillerinde zararlı lepidopter türlerinin saptanması, yayılış alanları, zarar şekilleri ve Sesamia nonagrioides Lef.'in kısa biyolojisi üzerine araştırmalar. GTHB Zirai Mücadele ve Zirai Karantina GM, Araştırma Eserleri Serisi, No: 35, pp: 112.
  30. Tiftikci P, Kornoşor S. 2015. Studies on determination of Lepidopteran pests, their dispersion and distribution in maize fields in Çanakkale. Cukurova J Agric Fac, 3(2): 107–118.
  31. TURKSTAT. 2024. Crop production statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?locale=tr (accessed date: November 3, 2024).
  32. Woodhead S, Taneja SL. 1987. The importance of behaviour of young larvae in sorghum resistance to Chilo partellus. Entomol Exp Appl, 45(1): 47–54.