Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2025 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 6

Errors in the Determination of Expropriation Compensation in Energy Transmission Line Expropriations

Mahmut Tiryaki(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARIMSAL YAPILAR VE SULAMA BÖLÜMÜ, TARIMSAL YAPILAR VE SULAMA PR.)0009-0005-9167-4020
Bilal Cemek(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0503-6497
Kadir Ersin Temizel(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1806-3950
Pages
828–842
Publication Date
2025-11-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the largest errors in the determination of expropriation compensation were, in order: errors arising from the incorrect selection of the value reduction rate at 600%, errors related to the distinction between irrigated and non-irrigated agricultural land at 203%, and errors resulting from using total net income instead of the annual average net income in the net income calculation at 200%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Energy transmission lines established for the public good impact private real estate, creating an obligation for expropriation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The accurate determination of the expropriation compensation is of great importance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the largest errors in the determination of expropriation compensation were, in order: errors arising from the incorrect selection of the value reduction rate at 600%, errors related to the distinction between irrigated and non-irrigated agricultural land at 203%, and errors resulting from using total net income instead of the annual average net income in the net income calculation at 200%.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Expropriation compensation · Energy transmission line · Capitalisation rate

Abstract

Energy transmission lines established for the public good impact private real estate, creating an obligation for expropriation. In expropriation procedures, the expropriation compensation is paid to the owner of the real estate. The accurate determination of the expropriation compensation is of great importance. Various problems and errors are encountered in determining the expropriation compensation. This study addressed the errors made in determining the expropriation compensation by categorizing them. Additionally, the errors made in compensation determination are explained with numerical examples. It was concluded that the largest errors in the determination of expropriation compensation were, in order: errors arising from the incorrect selection of the value reduction rate at 600%, errors related to the distinction between irrigated and non-irrigated agricultural land at 203%, and errors resulting from using total net income instead of the annual average net income in the net income calculation at 200%. In each example provided, the errors were addressed separately. However, considering that several of the aforementioned errors in expropriation practices may occur in the same valuation, the determination of compensation must be carried out objectively and with great care.

Özet

Energy transmission lines established for the public good impact private real estate, creating an obligation for expropriation. In expropriation procedures, the expropriation compensation is paid to the owner of the real estate. The accurate determination of the expropriation compensation is of great importance. Various problems and errors are encountered in determining the expropriation compensation. This study addressed the errors made in determining the expropriation compensation by categorizing them. Additionally, the errors made in compensation determination are explained with numerical examples. It was concluded that the largest errors in the determination of expropriation compensation were, in order: errors arising from the incorrect selection of the value reduction rate at 600%, errors related to the distinction between irrigated and non-irrigated agricultural land at 203%, and errors resulting from using total net income instead of the annual average net income in the net income calculation at 200%. In each example provided, the errors were addressed separately. However, considering that several of the aforementioned errors in expropriation practices may occur in the same valuation, the determination of compensation must be carried out objectively and with great care.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tiryaki, M., Cemek, B., Temizel, K. E. (2025). Errors in the Determination of Expropriation Compensation in Energy Transmission Line Expropriations. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 6, 828–842. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1790222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Çankırı Land Registry Office, 2024. URL: https://www.tkgm.gov.tr (Accessed date: May 3, 2024).
  2. Dağdemir V, Aşkan E, Demir O, Tercan S. 2018. Ağri ili merkez ilçe tarim arazilerinde kapitalizasyon oranının tespiti. Alinteri J Agri Sci, 33(2): 133-139.
  3. Döner F, Kaya E. 2021. Enerji nakil hattı projelerinin uygulanmasında arazi mülkiyetinin kazanılması sürecinin değerlendirilmesi. Geomatik, 6(3): 189-197.
  4. Engindeniz S, 2010. Tarım arazilerinin kamulaştırılmasında gelir yöntemini uygulama esasları. Türktarım Derg, 192: 53-57.
  5. İncekara ÇÖ, Lala S. 2023. Enerji projelerinde arazi edinim faaliyetleri ve arazi değerlemesi. Geomatik, 8(1): 61-71.
  6. Karagöl Ö. 2009. Kamulaştırma davalarında bedel tespiti esasları. MSc thesis, İstanbul Kültür University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye, pp: 104.
  7. Karakayacı Z. 2023. Konya ili tarım arazileri için kapitalizasyon oranı ve değer tespiti. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniv Tarım ve Doğa Derg, 26(3): 664-672.
  8. Keskin G. 2022. Tarımsal değerlemede gelirlerin kapitalizasyonu ve pazar değeri tartışması. Türkiye Arazi Yön Derg, 4(2): 74-81.
  9. Kılıç O. 2011. Kamulaştırma davalarında arsa-arazi ayrımı. Akdeniz Univ J Fac Agric, 24(1): 15-18.
  10. Kılıç O. 2022. Tarım arazisinin kamulaştırma bedelinin belirlenmesiyle ilgili bilirkişi raporlarının teknik ve hukuki yönden incelenmesi. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Derg, 9(1): 79-89.
  11. Kılıç O. 2024. Arazi değerinin belirlenmesinde objektif değer artışının kullanılması. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Derg, 11(1): 109-116.
  12. Marabaoğlu SN, Uzun B. 2024. Yüksek voltajlı iletim hattı kamulaştırmalarında irtifak bedelinin hesaplanması için yeni bir yöntem önerisi. Jeodezi Jeoinformasyon Derg, 11(1): 1-18.
  13. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2024. URL: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr (Accessed date: May 1, 2025).
  14. Mülayim ZG. 2008. Tarımsal değer biçme ve bilirkişilik, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, Türkiye, 3. baskı, pp: 73
  15. Oğuz C, Ünal Z. 2004. Determination of capitalization rate in ırrigated lands of çumra district of konya province. Selcuk J Agric Food Sci, 18(33): 8-16.
  16. Özel S. 2015. Tarımsal arazilerin kamulaştırma bedelinin tespitine yönelik yasal ölçütlerin mülkiyet hakkı açısından incelenmesi. Batman Univ Yasam Bilim Derg, 5(1): 162-181
  17. Pšunder I, Cirman A. 2011. Discount rate when using methods based on discounted cash flow for the purpose of real estate investment analysis and valuatıon. Geod vestn, 55(3): 561-575.
  18. Rehber E. 2017. Tarımsal değerleme ve bilirkişilik. Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa, Türkiye, 4. baskı, pp: 66.
  19. Tahtalı MB. 2021. Türk hukukunda kamulaştırılan taşınmazın geri alınmasında idarenin sorumluluğunun eski malike yükletilmesi sorunu. Türkiye Adalet Akad Derg, (46): 499-528.
  20. Tepe S. 2009. Kamulaştırma ve mülkiyet ilişkisinin irdelenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. MSc thesis, Selçuk University, Institute of Science, Konya, Türkiye, pp: 1.
  21. Yalçın G, Selçuk O, Şentürk E. 2018. Bursa ili mustafakemalpaşa ilçesi tarım arazilerinde kapitalizasyon oranının tespiti. Afyon Kocatepe Univ Fen Muh Bilim Derg, 18(2): 548-560.
  22. Yıldırım B, Başsorgun N. 2007. Açıklamalı-içtihatlı eski ve yeni kamulaştırma kamulaştırmasız el atma ve imar mevzuatından doğan bedel davaları. Yetkin Yayınları. Ankara, Türkiye, 1. baskı, pp: 278-294.