SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Defense-Related Enzymes in Plant Disease Resistance: Molecular Regulation and Agricultural Applications

Fatma Gönül Sezgin(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9400-5173
Pages
323–331
Publication Date
2026-03-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, this review underscores the importance of defense-related enzymes as major contributors to plant disease resistance and their potential contribution to resilient and sustainable agricultural systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Plant diseases caused by fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens represent a major constraint to global agricultural productivity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This review provides a comprehensive overview of the enzymatic components of plant disease resistance, with a particular focus on key defense-related enzymes, including phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, peroxidases, chitinases, β-1,3-glucanases, and polyphenol oxidase.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, this review underscores the importance of defense-related enzymes as major contributors to plant disease resistance and their potential contribution to resilient and sustainable agricultural systems.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Plant immunity · Defense-related enzymes · Plant–pathogen interactions

Abstract

Plant diseases caused by fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens represent a major constraint to global agricultural productivity. Plants rely on a complex and highly regulated defense system in which defense-related enzymes play central roles in restricting pathogen invasion and disease progression. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the enzymatic components of plant disease resistance, with a particular focus on key defense-related enzymes, including phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, peroxidases, chitinases, β-1,3-glucanases, and polyphenol oxidase. The biochemical functions of these enzymes in reinforcing cell walls, generating antimicrobial compounds, and regulating reactive oxygen species are discussed in relation to their contribution to plant immunity. Furthermore, the molecular regulation of defense-related enzymes is examined, emphasizing the roles of pathogen recognition, phytohormone-mediated signaling pathways, transcriptional control, and signal cross-talk. Recent advances in omics technologies are highlighted as powerful tools for elucidating regulatory networks underlying enzyme-mediated defense responses. In addition to molecular mechanisms, this review explores the agricultural and biotechnological applications of defense-related enzymes, including their use as biochemical markers in breeding programs, targets for genetic improvement, and key components of induced resistance strategies. Current challenges, such as growth–defense trade-offs and environmental influences on enzyme activity, are also addressed, along with future perspectives for integrating molecular insights into sustainable disease management and crop improvement. Overall, this review underscores the importance of defense-related enzymes as major contributors to plant disease resistance and their potential contribution to resilient and sustainable agricultural systems.

Özet

Plant diseases caused by fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens represent a major constraint to global agricultural productivity. Plants rely on a complex and highly regulated defense system in which defense-related enzymes play central roles in restricting pathogen invasion and disease progression. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the enzymatic components of plant disease resistance, with a particular focus on key defense-related enzymes, including phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, peroxidases, chitinases, β-1,3-glucanases, and polyphenol oxidase. The biochemical functions of these enzymes in reinforcing cell walls, generating antimicrobial compounds, and regulating reactive oxygen species are discussed in relation to their contribution to plant immunity. Furthermore, the molecular regulation of defense-related enzymes is examined, emphasizing the roles of pathogen recognition, phytohormone-mediated signaling pathways, transcriptional control, and signal cross-talk. Recent advances in omics technologies are highlighted as powerful tools for elucidating regulatory networks underlying enzyme-mediated defense responses. In addition to molecular mechanisms, this review explores the agricultural and biotechnological applications of defense-related enzymes, including their use as biochemical markers in breeding programs, targets for genetic improvement, and key components of induced resistance strategies. Current challenges, such as growth–defense trade-offs and environmental influences on enzyme activity, are also addressed, along with future perspectives for integrating molecular insights into sustainable disease management and crop improvement. Overall, this review underscores the importance of defense-related enzymes as major contributors to plant disease resistance and their potential contribution to resilient and sustainable agricultural systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sezgin, F. G. (2026). Defense-Related Enzymes in Plant Disease Resistance: Molecular Regulation and Agricultural Applications. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 323–331. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1868834

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Balasubramanian, V., Vashisht, D., Cletus, J., & Sakthivel, N. (2012). Plant β-1,3-glucanases: Their biological functions and transgenic expression against phytopathogenic fungi. Biotechnology Letters, 34(11), 1983–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-012-1012-6
  2. Bigeard, J., Colcombet, J., & Hirt, H. (2015). Signaling mechanisms in pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). Molecular Plant, 8(4), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.022
  3. Chen, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, H., & Gao, C. (2019). CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 70, 667–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049
  4. Constabel, C. P., & Barbehenn, R. (2008). Defensive roles of polyphenol oxidase in plants. In Induced plant resistance to herbivory (pp. 253-270). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  5. Dixon, R. A., Achnine, L., Kota, P., Liu, C. J., Reddy, M. S. S., & Wang, L. (2002). The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—A genomics perspective. Molecular Plant Pathology, 3(5), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00131.x
  6. Eulgem, T., & Somssich, I. E. (2007). Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 10(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.020
  7. Fu, Z. Q., & Dong, X. (2013). Systemic acquired resistance: Turning local infection into global defense. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 64, 839–863. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105606
  8. Grover, A. (2012). Plant chitinases: Genetic diversity and physiological roles. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 31(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.616043
  9. Hammerschmidt, R. (1999). Induced disease resistance: How do induced plants stop pathogens? Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 55(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1999.0215
  10. Hiraga, S., Sasaki, K., Ito, H., Ohashi, Y., & Matsui, H. (2001). A large family of class III plant peroxidases. Plant and Cell Physiology, 42(5), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pce061
  11. Huot, B., Yao, J., Montgomery, B. L., & He, S. Y. (2014). Growth–defense tradeoffs in plants: A balancing act to optimize fitness. Molecular Plant, 7(8), 1267–1287. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu049
  12. Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006). The plant immune system. Nature, 444(7117), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05286
  13. Kasprzewska, A. (2003). Plant chitinases—Regulation and function. Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, 8(3), 809–824.
  14. Lämke, J., & Bäurle, I. (2017). Epigenetic and chromatin-based mechanisms in environmental stress adaptation and stress memory in plants. Genome Biology, 18, 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1263-6
  15. Liu, L., Sonbol, F. M., Huot, B., Gu, Y., Withers, J., Mwimba, M., … Dong, X. (2015). Salicylic acid receptors activate jasmonic acid signalling through a non-canonical pathway to promote effector-triggered immunity. Nature Communications, 7, 13099. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13099
  16. Mandal, S., Mallick, N., & Mitra, A. (2009). Salicylic acid-induced resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato. Plant physiology and Biochemistry, 47(7), 642-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.03.001
  17. Mayer, A. M. (2006). Polyphenol oxidases in plants and fungi: Going places? A review. Phytochemistry, 67(21), 2318–2331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.08.006
  18. Naz, M., Zhang, D., Liao, K., Chen, X., Ahmed, N., Wang, D., Zhou, J., & Chen, Z. (2024). The past, present, and future of plant activators targeting the salicylic acid signaling pathway. Genes, 15(9), 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15091237
  19. Passardi, F., Cosio, C., Penel, C., & Dunand, C. (2005). Peroxidases have more functions than a Swiss army knife. Plant Cell Reports, 24(5), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0972-6
  20. Pieterse, C. M. J., Van der Does, D., Zamioudis, C., Leon-Reyes, A., & Van Wees, S. C. M. (2012). Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 28, 489–521. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055
  21. Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S. J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N., & Nelson, A. (2019). The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(3), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y
  22. Shobade, S. O., Nilsen-Hamilton, M., & Zabotina, O. A. (2025). Plant Defense Proteins: Recent Discoveries and Applications. Plants, 14(13), 2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132069
  23. Torres, M. A., Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006). Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiology, 141(2), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.079467
  24. van Loon, L. C., Rep, M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2006). Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 44, 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425
  25. Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009). Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 47, 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202
  26. Vogt, T. (2010). Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Molecular Plant, 3(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssp106
  27. Walters, D. R., Ratsep, J., & Havis, N. D. (2013). Controlling crop diseases using induced resistance: Challenges for the future. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(5), 1263–1280. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert026
  28. Wu, X., Zhu, S., He, L., Cheng, G., Li, T., Meng, W., & Wen, F. (2025). Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase: A core regulator of plant carbon metabolic flux redistribution—from molecular mechanisms and growth modulation to stress adaptability. Plants, 14(24), 3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243811