Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Modeling Early Growth of Honamlı Kids Using Nonlinear Growth Curves

Esra Yavuz(SIRNAK UNIVERSITY, CİZRE VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0002-5589-297X
Pages
295–299
Publication Date
2026-03-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The performance of the models was evaluated based on error metrics, fit coefficients, and information criteria, and the findings revealed significant differences between the models.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, five different nonlinear growth models Gompertz, Logistic, Gamma, Brody, and Wilmink were compared using the average live weights of 32 Honamlı kids for 8 months of age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The performance of the models was evaluated based on error metrics, fit coefficients, and information criteria, and the findings revealed significant differences between the models.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is anticipated that future studies using datasets covering wider age ranges and including environmental factors will contribute to a more detailed understanding of growth characteristics in Honamlı goats.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Live weight · Honamlı goat · Nonlinear models

Abstract

In this study, five different nonlinear growth models Gompertz, Logistic, Gamma, Brody, and Wilmink were compared using the average live weights of 32 Honamlı kids for 8 months of age. The performance of the models was evaluated based on error metrics, fit coefficients, and information criteria, and the findings revealed significant differences between the models. As a result of the overall evaluation, the logistic model (R2=0.987) was determined to be the model that best represents the growth process of Honamlı kids during their early and middle developmental stages, due to its low prediction error, high explanatory power, and superiority in terms of information criteria. The results show that the logistic growth model is an effective method for reliably predicting live weight gain in Honamlı kids and for explaining growth dynamics in a biologically significant way. This model demonstrates that it can be used as a decision support mechanism in planning selection programs, conducting early performance assessments, and developing breeding strategies. It is anticipated that future studies using datasets covering wider age ranges and including environmental factors will contribute to a more detailed understanding of growth characteristics in Honamlı goats.

Özet

In this study, five different nonlinear growth models Gompertz, Logistic, Gamma, Brody, and Wilmink were compared using the average live weights of 32 Honamlı kids for 8 months of age. The performance of the models was evaluated based on error metrics, fit coefficients, and information criteria, and the findings revealed significant differences between the models. As a result of the overall evaluation, the logistic model (R2=0.987) was determined to be the model that best represents the growth process of Honamlı kids during their early and middle developmental stages, due to its low prediction error, high explanatory power, and superiority in terms of information criteria. The results show that the logistic growth model is an effective method for reliably predicting live weight gain in Honamlı kids and for explaining growth dynamics in a biologically significant way. This model demonstrates that it can be used as a decision support mechanism in planning selection programs, conducting early performance assessments, and developing breeding strategies. It is anticipated that future studies using datasets covering wider age ranges and including environmental factors will contribute to a more detailed understanding of growth characteristics in Honamlı goats.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yavuz, E. (2026). Modeling Early Growth of Honamlı Kids Using Nonlinear Growth Curves. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 295–299. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1888844

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akbaş, Y., Taşkın, T., & Demirören, E. (1999). Comparison of the fit of different models to the growth curves of Kıvırcık and Dağlıç male lambs. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 23(9), 537-544.
  2. Çalı, B. (2017). Comparison of growth curve models in Ankara goat kids. (Master's Thesis, Selçuk University, Institute of Science).
  3. Çetenak, T., Gök, İ., Yavuz, E., & Şahin, M. (2024). Statistical models and evaluation criteria used in poultry farming. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 7(6), 710-719. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1532659
  4. Makgopa, L. F., Mathapo, M. C., & Tyasi, T. L. (2024). A systematic review of estimation of growth curve in goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 56(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03857-0
  5. Önder, H., Boz, M. A., Sarica, M., Abaci, S. H., & Yamak, U. S. (2017). Comparison of growth curve models in Turkish native geese. European Poultry Science, 81, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2017.193
  6. Önder, H., Yılmaz, M., Şahin, M., Şen, U., Bozkurt, S., Erensoy, K., Gök, İ., Tolun, T., & Uçar, A. (2025). Classification and comparison of eight different growth curve methods for Pekin duck. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 11, e70476. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70476
  7. Tirink, C., Önder, H., Yurtseven, S., & Akil, Z. K. (2022). Comparison of some non-linear functions to describe the growth for Linda geese with CART and XGBoost algorithms. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 67(11), 454-464. https://doi.org/10.17221/129/2022-CJAS
  8. Tolun, T., Yavuz, E., Şahin, M., & Gök, İ. (2023). Modeling egg curves in partridges. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 6(1): 21-25. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1139272
  9. Tolun, T., Gök, İ., & Şahin, M. (2024). Modeling of some egg characteristics in Henna partridges. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 7(6), 729-742. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1555738
  10. Topal, M., & Bölükbaşı, S.C. (2008). Comparison of nonlinear growth curve models in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 34(2), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2008.9706960
  11. Türker, İ., Narinç, D., & Alkan, S. (2017). Comparison and modeling of time-dependent changes in egg weight in domestic and foreign hybrid laying flocks. Academic Journal of Agriculture, 6(2), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.371075
  12. Yalçınöz, E., & Şahin, M. (2020). Modeling of egg production curves in poultry. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 23(5), 1373 –1778. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.691069
  13. Yavuz, E., Önem, A.B., Kaya, F., Çanga, D., & Şahin, M. (2019). Modeling of individual growth curves in Japanese quails. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 2(1),11-15.
  14. Yılmaz, M., & Önder, H. (2023). Comparison of growth curve models in Pekin ducks. In VII. International Congress on Domestic Animal Breeding, Genetics and Husbandry – 2023 (ICABGEH–23).