SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Body Condition, Rumen Fill and Quantitative-Qualitative Milk Parameters in Primiparous Anatolian Buffalo Cows Housed with or without Access to Pasture

İbrahim Cihangir Okuyucu(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2138-6577
Pages
280–286
Publication Date
2026-03-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate that PG cows have low BCS and RFS, which can negatively affect some quantitative-qualitative milk parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) are typically raised in pasture-based production systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted on a total of 72 buffalo cows in two barns on a farm in Samsun, Türkiye: the first barn was pasture-grazing (PG, n=36) and the second barn was non-pasture-grazing (NG, n=36).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate that PG cows have low BCS and RFS, which can negatively affect some quantitative-qualitative milk parameters.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Buffalo · Access to pasture · Confinement in barn

Abstract

Water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) are typically raised in pasture-based production systems. However, production systems where buffaloes are confined permanently in barns (no grazing) or have access to pasture (pasture-grazing) have become more common recently. Therefore, differences in the production systems provided to buffalo cows may alter the welfare parameters and productivity of cow. This study aimed to investigate the effects of pasture-grazing (PG) and no grazing (NG) management practices on certain welfare assessment criteria [(body condition score (BCS) and rumen fill score (RFS)] and quantitative-qualitative milk parameters in primiparous Anatolian buffalo cows. This study was conducted on a total of 72 buffalo cows in two barns on a farm in Samsun, Türkiye: the first barn was pasture-grazing (PG, n=36) and the second barn was non-pasture-grazing (NG, n=36). Body condition and rumen fill were scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5 to subjectively assess the nutritional status of cows. Additionally, milk samples were collected to determine quantitative-qualitative milk parameters [test-day milk yield (TDMY), dry matter (DM), fat, solids non-fat (SNF), protein, fat-to-protein ratio (FPR), lactose, density, freezing point (FP), somatic cell count (SCC), pH, electrical conductivity (EC)]. The milk components were analysed using an automatic milk analyser. Milk EC and pH were measured using a calibrated EC meter and pH meter, respectively. The SCC was determined using a somatic cell counter device. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. The BCS, RFS and quantitative-qualitative milk parameters of the PG and NG groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and t-test, respectively. BCS and RFS of NG cows were higher than those of PG cows. Additionally, TDMY and milk protein content of NG cows were higher than those of PG cows, but fat content, FPR, EC and SCC were lower. TDMY was positively correlated with BCS and RFS. Milk hygiene and udder health indicators (SCC and EC) showed negative correlations with BCS and RFS. These results indicate that PG cows have low BCS and RFS, which can negatively affect some quantitative-qualitative milk parameters.

Özet

Water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) are typically raised in pasture-based production systems. However, production systems where buffaloes are confined permanently in barns (no grazing) or have access to pasture (pasture-grazing) have become more common recently. Therefore, differences in the production systems provided to buffalo cows may alter the welfare parameters and productivity of cow. This study aimed to investigate the effects of pasture-grazing (PG) and no grazing (NG) management practices on certain welfare assessment criteria [(body condition score (BCS) and rumen fill score (RFS)] and quantitative-qualitative milk parameters in primiparous Anatolian buffalo cows. This study was conducted on a total of 72 buffalo cows in two barns on a farm in Samsun, Türkiye: the first barn was pasture-grazing (PG, n=36) and the second barn was non-pasture-grazing (NG, n=36). Body condition and rumen fill were scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 5 to subjectively assess the nutritional status of cows. Additionally, milk samples were collected to determine quantitative-qualitative milk parameters [test-day milk yield (TDMY), dry matter (DM), fat, solids non-fat (SNF), protein, fat-to-protein ratio (FPR), lactose, density, freezing point (FP), somatic cell count (SCC), pH, electrical conductivity (EC)]. The milk components were analysed using an automatic milk analyser. Milk EC and pH were measured using a calibrated EC meter and pH meter, respectively. The SCC was determined using a somatic cell counter device. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. The BCS, RFS and quantitative-qualitative milk parameters of the PG and NG groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and t-test, respectively. BCS and RFS of NG cows were higher than those of PG cows. Additionally, TDMY and milk protein content of NG cows were higher than those of PG cows, but fat content, FPR, EC and SCC were lower. TDMY was positively correlated with BCS and RFS. Milk hygiene and udder health indicators (SCC and EC) showed negative correlations with BCS and RFS. These results indicate that PG cows have low BCS and RFS, which can negatively affect some quantitative-qualitative milk parameters.

🔖

Cite This Article

Okuyucu, İ. C. (2026). Evaluation of Body Condition, Rumen Fill and Quantitative-Qualitative Milk Parameters in Primiparous Anatolian Buffalo Cows Housed with or without Access to Pasture. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 280–286. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1857015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Akdağ, A., Okuyucu, İ. C., Erdem, H., Kul, E., & Ocak, N. (2024). Some Welfare Assessment Traits and Quantitative-Qualitative Milk Parameters as Affected by Supplementary Feeding at Milking and Parity in Anatolian Buffalo Cows. Animals, 14(6), 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060956
  2. Anitha, A., Rao, K. S., Suresh, J., Moorthy, P. S., & Reddy, Y. K. (2011). A body condition score (BCS) system in Murrah buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin, 30(1), 79-96.
  3. Atasever, S. (2022). Relationships between animal welfare scores and milk somatic cell count in Anatolian buffaloes. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 10(6), 1120-1124. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10i6.1120-1124.5225
  4. Atasever, S., Erdem, H., & Okuyucu, I. C. (2020). Interrelationships of body condition score with rumen fill in Anatolian buffalo herds. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 52(3), 1181. https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20190424120405
  5. Aytekin, İ., & Boztepe, S. (2014). Somatic cell count, importance and effect factors in dairy cattle. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 2(3), 112-121.
  6. Bareille, N., Beaudeau, F., Billon, S., Robert, A., & Faverdin. P. (2003). Effects of health disorders on feed intake and milk production in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science, 83(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00040-X
  7. Bramley, E., Costa, N. D., Fulkerson, W. J., & Lean, I. J. (2013). Associations between body condition, rumen fill, diarrhoea and lameness and ruminal acidosis in Australian dairy herds. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 61(6), 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2013.806882
  8. Burfeind, O., Sepúlveda, P., Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Weary, D. M., Veira, D. M., & Heuwieser, W. (2010). Evaluation of a scoring system for rumen fill in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(8), 3635-3640. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-3044
  9. Castelán-Ortega, O. A., Martinez-Garcia, C. G., Mould, F. L., Dorward, P., Miranda-de La Lama, G. C., Cruz-Monterrosa, R. G., & Rayas-Amor, A. A. (2018). Grazing behaviour of dairy cows and body condition score associated with sward characteristics of four pasture types. Experimental Agriculture, 54(2), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447971600020X
  10. Chiariotti, A., Borghese, A., Boselli, C., & Barile, V. L. (2025). Water Buffalo’s Adaptability to Different Environments and Farming Systems: A Review. Animals, 15(11), 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111538
  11. Costa, A., Neglia, G., Campanile, G., & De Marchi, M. (2020). Milk somatic cell count and its relationship with milk yield and quality traits in Italian water buffaloes. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(6), 5485- 5494. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-18009
  12. de la Cruz-Cruz, L. A., Guerrero-Legarreta, I., Ramirez-Necoechea, R., Roldan-Santiago, P., Mora-Medina, P., Hernandez-Gonzalez, R., & Mota-Rojas, D. (2014). The behaviour and productivity of water buffalo in different breeding systems: a review. Veterinární Medicína, 59(4), 181-193.
  13. Degirmencioğlu, T., Ünal, H., & Kuraloğlu, H. (2015). Comparison of extensive or semi-intensive feeding for Anatolian water buffalo. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 27(9), 712-715. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2015.04.07
  14. Demirci B. H., & Okuyucu, İ. C., (2025). Effects of body condition score (BCS) on milk quality traits of Anatolian buffalo cows in early lactation. In 8. International Food, Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences Congress.
  15. Drescher, M., Heitkönig, I. M. A., Raats, J. G., & Prins, H. H. T. (2006). The role of grass stems as structural foraging deterrents and their effects on the foraging behaviour of cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 101(1-2), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.01.011
  16. Erdem, H., & Okuyucu, I. C. (2019). Influence of hygiene status of cows on somatic cell count and milk components during summer season. Large Animal Review, 25(1), 7-10.
  17. Goldhawk, C., Chapinal, N., Veira, D. M., Weary, D. M., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2009). Prepartum feeding behavior is an early indicator of subclinical ketosis. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 4971–4977. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2242
  18. Huzzey, J. M., Veira, D. M., Weary, D. M, & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2007). Prepartum behavior and dry matter intake identify dairy cows at risk for metritis. Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 3220–3233. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-807
  19. Leso, L., Andrade, R. R., Bambi, G., Becciolini, V., & Barbari, M. (2023). Free-choice pasture access for dry cows: Effects on health, behavior, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(11), 7954-7964. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23107
  20. Maurya, V. P., Sejian, V., Kumar, K., Singh, G., & Naqvi, S. M. K. (2012). Walking stress influence on livestock production. In Environmental stress and amelioration in livestock production. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  21. Neave, H. W., Edwards, J. P., Thoday, H., Saunders, K., Zobel, G., & Webster, J. R. (2021). Do walking distance and time away from the paddock influence daily behaviour patterns and milk yield of grazing dairy cows?. Animals, 11(10), 2903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102903
  22. Okuyucu, İ. C. (2025a). Heat and cold stress in water buffaloes (Bubalus Bubalis): A Review. In VII. International Agricultural, Biological & Life Science Conference.
  23. Okuyucu, İ. C. (2025b). Effects of milking methods on test-day milk yield and milk quality traits in early lactating multiparous buffalo cows and the relationships among these parameters. In 4th International Congresses of Turkish Science and Technology.
  24. Okuyucu, İ. C., Akdağ, A., Erdem, H., Kop-Bozbay, C., Abacı, S. H., Garipoğlu, A. V., Hazneci E., & Ocak, N. (2024). Welfare assessment traits, milk quantity and quality, and profitability of Anatolian buffalo cows confined in closed-tied or semi-open free-stall barns can be affected by supplementary feeding at milking. Animal Bioscience, 37(6), 1110. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.23.0366
  25. Önder, H. (2018). Nonparametric statistical methods used in biological experiments. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 1(1), 1-6.
  26. Rajčević, M., Potočnik, K., & Levstek, J. (2003). Correlations between somatic cells count and milk composition with regard to the season. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 68(3), 221-226.
  27. Robles, I., Zambelis, A., Kelton, D. F., Barkema, H. W., Keefe, G. P., Roy, J. P., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. & DeVries, T. J. (2021). Associations of freestall design and cleanliness with cow lying behavior, hygiene, lameness, and risk of high somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(2), 2231-2242. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18916
  28. Saber, A., Hassan, M., El Nabtiti, A., Hassan, A., & Mansour, S. (2017). Evaluation of field techniques to diagnose early subclinical mastitis in relation to hygiene score in a buffalo farm. Catrina: The International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 16(1), 53-60.
  29. Sahin, A., Yıldırım, A., & Ulutas, Z. (2014). Relationships between somatic cell count and some raw milk paramaters of Anatolian buffaloes. Journal of Tekirdağ Agricultural Faculty, 11(1), 114-121.
  30. Saqib, M. N., Qureshi, M. S., Suhail, S. M., Khan, R. U., Bozzo, G., Ceci, E., Laudadio V., & Tufarelli, V. (2022). Association among metabolic status, oxidative stress, milk yield, body condition score and reproductive cyclicity in dairy buffaloes. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 57(5), 498-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14086
  31. Schneider, M., Hart, L., Gallmann, E., & Umstätter, C. (2022). A novel chart to score rumen fill following simple sequential instructions. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 82(1), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2022.02.007
  32. Schreiner D.A., & Ruegg P.L. (2003). Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(11), 3460-3465. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73950-2
  33. Stadnik, L., Atasever, S., & Duchácek, J. (2017). Effects of body condition score and daily milk yield on reproduction traits of Czech Fleckvieh cows. Animal Reproduction, 14, 1264-1269. https://doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR944
  34. Yavrucu, O., & Kılıç, Ü. (2021). Effect of feeding routines in different buffalo facilities on milk composition and methane production. International Multilingual Journal of Science and Technology, 6(12), 4601-4611.