SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Sustainable Management of Sewage Sludge via Vermicomposting: Synergistic Effects of Hazelnut Husk and Cow Manure on Microbial Dynamics

Fevziye Şüheda Hepşen Türkay(KIRŞEHİR AHİ EVRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9413-264X
Rıdvan Kızılkaya(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-7475-9851
Pages
271–279
Publication Date
2026-03-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study concluded that mixing sewage sludge with HH and CM at proportions below 50% SS provides an ideal environment for earthworm activity and microbial proliferation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to investigate the stabilization and transformational potential of anaerobically digested sewage sludge (SS) through vermicomposting, using hazelnut husk (HH) and cow manure (CM) as bulking agents and carbon sources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research focused on the performance of the epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida in managing these organic wastes and monitored the resulting changes in microbial dynamics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study concluded that mixing sewage sludge with HH and CM at proportions below 50% SS provides an ideal environment for earthworm activity and microbial proliferation.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Basal respiration · Eisenia fetida · Hazelnut husk

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the stabilization and transformational potential of anaerobically digested sewage sludge (SS) through vermicomposting, using hazelnut husk (HH) and cow manure (CM) as bulking agents and carbon sources. The research focused on the performance of the epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida in managing these organic wastes and monitored the resulting changes in microbial dynamics. An incubation experiment was established with eleven different feed mixtures, ranging from 0% to 100% SS proportions by weight. The mixtures were incubated under controlled laboratory conditions at 20 °C in total darkness for a period of 90 days, with moisture levels maintained at 80% of the water-holding capacity. Microbial activity indicators, specifically basal soil respiration (BSR) and microbial biomass carbon (Cmic), were systematically analyzed at 15-day intervals (days 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90). The experimental results revealed that Eisenia fetida could not maintain viability in mixtures containing 60% or higher doses of sewage sludge, identifying a critical toxicity threshold for the vermicomposting process. Statistical analysis showed significant differences (P<0.001) in microbiological properties across all feed rations. Both BSR and Cmic levels reached their maximum values on the 30th day of incubation, followed by a gradual decline, indicating the onset of organic matter stabilization. The study concluded that mixing sewage sludge with HH and CM at proportions below 50% SS provides an ideal environment for earthworm activity and microbial proliferation. These findings suggest that the produced vermicompost serves as a sustainable and efficient soil conditioner for land restoration and agricultural practices.

Özet

This study was conducted to investigate the stabilization and transformational potential of anaerobically digested sewage sludge (SS) through vermicomposting, using hazelnut husk (HH) and cow manure (CM) as bulking agents and carbon sources. The research focused on the performance of the epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida in managing these organic wastes and monitored the resulting changes in microbial dynamics. An incubation experiment was established with eleven different feed mixtures, ranging from 0% to 100% SS proportions by weight. The mixtures were incubated under controlled laboratory conditions at 20 °C in total darkness for a period of 90 days, with moisture levels maintained at 80% of the water-holding capacity. Microbial activity indicators, specifically basal soil respiration (BSR) and microbial biomass carbon (Cmic), were systematically analyzed at 15-day intervals (days 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90). The experimental results revealed that Eisenia fetida could not maintain viability in mixtures containing 60% or higher doses of sewage sludge, identifying a critical toxicity threshold for the vermicomposting process. Statistical analysis showed significant differences (P<0.001) in microbiological properties across all feed rations. Both BSR and Cmic levels reached their maximum values on the 30th day of incubation, followed by a gradual decline, indicating the onset of organic matter stabilization. The study concluded that mixing sewage sludge with HH and CM at proportions below 50% SS provides an ideal environment for earthworm activity and microbial proliferation. These findings suggest that the produced vermicompost serves as a sustainable and efficient soil conditioner for land restoration and agricultural practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

Türkay, F. Ş. H., Kızılkaya, R. (2026). Sustainable Management of Sewage Sludge via Vermicomposting: Synergistic Effects of Hazelnut Husk and Cow Manure on Microbial Dynamics. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 271–279. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1879668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Akanbi Mohammed, A., Cheema, A. I., Cely-Vargas, L. Y., Lv, N., & Dong, B. (2026). Optimizing earthworm stocking density for process efficiency and compost maturity in food waste and sewage sludge vermicomposting. Bioresource Technology Reports, 33, 102602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2026.102602
  2. Anderson, J. P. E. (1982). Soil respiration. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, & D. R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 831–871). American Society of Agronomy.
  3. Anderson, J. P., & Domsch, K. H. (1978). A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 10(3), 215–221.
  4. Bellitürk, K., & Sundari, R. S. (2024). Chapter 14 - The power of earthworm: vermicompost drives to sustainable agriculture. K. Huang, S. A. Bhat, F. Li, & V. Kumar (Eds.), In Earthworm Technology in Organic Waste Management (pp. 307–321). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-16050-9.00018-9
  5. Chaoui, H. I., Zibilske, L. M., & Ohno, T. (2003). Effects of earthworm casts and compost on soil microbial activity and plant nutrient availability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35(2), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00279-1
  6. Edwards, C. A., Arancon, N. Q., & Sherman, R. L. (2010). Vermiculture Technology: Earthworms, Organic Wastes, and Environmental Management (1st Edition ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10453
  7. Gao, F., Ye, L., Mu, X., Xu, L., Shi, Z., & Luo, Y. (2023). Synergistic effects of earthworms and cow manure under reduced chemical fertilization modified microbial community structure to mitigate continuous cropping effects on Chinese flowering cabbage. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1285464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1285464
  8. Gómez-Brandón, M., Fornasier, F., De Andrade, N., & Domínguez, J. (2022). Influence of earthworms on the microbial properties and extracellular enzyme activities during vermicomposting of raw and distilled grape marc. Journal of Environmental Management, 319, 115654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115654
  9. Gong, X., Zou, L., Wang, L., Zhang, B., & Jiang, J. (2023). Biochar improves compost humification, maturity and mitigates nitrogen loss during the vermicomposting of cattle manure-maize straw. Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116432
  10. Kacar, B. (1994). Bitki ve toprağın kimyasal analizleri. Ankara Ünİversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Eğitim, Araştırma ve Geliştirme Vakfı.
  11. Kizilkaya, R., Turkay, F. S. H., Türkmen, C., & Durmuş, M. (2012). Vermicompost Effects on Wheat Yield and Nutrient Contents in Soil and Plant. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 58(sup1), S175–S179. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2012.696777
  12. Kunito, T., Saeki, K., Goto, S., Hayashi, H., Oyaizu, H., & Matsumoto, S. (2001). Copper and zinc fractions affecting microorganisms in long-term sludge-amended soils. Bioresource Technology, 79(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00047-5
  13. Lal, R. (2024). Soil, soul, spirituality, and stewardship. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 79(1), 10A–14A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2024.1129A
  14. Ma, L., Zhang, L., & Feng, X. (2024). Optimization of Eisenia fetida stocking density for biotransformation during green waste vermicomposting. Waste Management, 187, 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.07.016
  15. Ndegwa, P., Thompson, S., & Das, K. (2000). Effects of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresource Technology, 71(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00055-3
  16. Reinecke, A., Viljoen, S. A., & Saayman, R. (1992). The suitability of Eudrilus eugeniae, Perionyx excavatus and Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta) for vermicomposting in southern Africa in terms of their temperature requirements. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24(12), 1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(92)90109-B
  17. Rusănescu, C. O., Rusănescu, M., Voicu, G., Paraschiv, G., Biriș, S. Ș., & Popescu, I. N. (2022). The recovery of vermicompost sewage sludge in agriculture. Agronomy, 12(11), 2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112653
  18. Ryan, J., Estefan, G., & Rashid, A. (2001). Soil and plant analysis laboratory manual. ICARDA.
  19. Srivastava, V., Goel, G., Thakur, V. K., Singh, R. P., de Araujo, A. S. F., & Singh, P. (2020). Analysis and advanced characterization of municipal solid waste vermicompost maturity for a green environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 109914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109914
  20. Tejada, M., Hernandez, M., & Garcia, C. (2009). Soil restoration using composted plant residues: Effects on soil properties. Soil and Tillage Research, 102(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.08.004
  21. Tiunov, A. V., & Scheu, S. (2000). Microbial biomass, biovolume and respiration in Lumbricus terrestris L. cast material of different age. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00165-0
  22. Türkay, İ. (2025). From gene to green product: an integrated pipeline of biotechnology and green chemistry for sustainable phytochemical production. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 30, 905-925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-025-00234-6
  23. Vuković, A., Velki, M., Ečimović, S., Vuković, R., Štolfa Čamagajevac, I., & Lončarić, Z. (2021). Vermicomposting—Facts, benefits and knowledge gaps. Agronomy, 11(10), 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101952
  24. Yakushev, A., Blagodatsky, S., & Byzov, B. (2009). The effect of earthworms on the physiological state of the microbial community at vermicomposting. Microbiology, 78(4), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002626170904016X
  25. Zhang, B.-G., Li, G.-T., Shen, T.-S., Wang, J.-K., & Sun, Z. (2000). Changes in microbial biomass C, N, and P and enzyme activities in soil incubated with the earthworms Metaphire guillelmi or Eisenia fetida. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32(14), 2055–2062. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00111-5