Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Harmonizing Agricultural Insurance Risk Zones with Machine Learning: A Cross-Branch Framework for Türkiye

Cevher Özden(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8445-4629
Pages
244–255
Publication Date
2026-03-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed methodology enhances actuarial fairness, transparency, and policy efficiency, providing a scalable foundation for modernizing state-supported agricultural insurance systems and advancing climate-resilient risk governance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Agriculture is increasingly exposed to systemic risks driven by climate change, including extreme weather events, yield instability, and market fluctuations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using official 2025 TARSIM datasets covering 71,902 localities, ordinal risk codes (A–Z) were encoded and analyzed through correlation statistics, clustering, and supervised learning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed methodology enhances actuarial fairness, transparency, and policy efficiency, providing a scalable foundation for modernizing state-supported agricultural insurance systems and advancing climate-resilient risk governance.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Agricultural insurance · Machine learning · Risk zoning

Abstract

Agriculture is increasingly exposed to systemic risks driven by climate change, including extreme weather events, yield instability, and market fluctuations. Effective risk zoning is therefore crucial for actuarially fair and sustainable agricultural insurance. However, in multi-branch systems such as Türkiye’s Agricultural Insurance Pool (TARSIM), different insurance lines such as Crop, Greenhouse, Livestock, and Income Protection, employ distinct criteria and coding schemes, often resulting in inconsistent regional classifications. This study introduces a novel Machine Learning-Based Cross-Branch Consistency Framework to evaluate and harmonize agricultural risk zoning across these branches. Using official 2025 TARSIM datasets covering 71,902 localities, ordinal risk codes (A–Z) were encoded and analyzed through correlation statistics, clustering, and supervised learning. The results revealed strong interdependencies among high-intensity perils such as hail and storm across open-field and greenhouse insurance lines (r > 0.98), and high spatial synchrony among staple crop risks (r ≈ 0.99), confirming the existence of shared systemic exposure. K-Means clustering identified five statistically robust regional risk archetypes that transcend administrative boundaries and branch definitions. A novel Cross-Branch Consistency Index (CBCI) was developed to quantify inter-branch alignment, highlighting regions of both coherence and discrepancy in current zoning logic. Supervised learning validation using Random Forest achieved over 95% classification accuracy, demonstrating the reliability and reproducibility of the ML-derived zones. The findings support a transition from fragmented, expert-driven zoning to an integrated, data-driven risk management framework. The proposed methodology enhances actuarial fairness, transparency, and policy efficiency, providing a scalable foundation for modernizing state-supported agricultural insurance systems and advancing climate-resilient risk governance.

Özet

Agriculture is increasingly exposed to systemic risks driven by climate change, including extreme weather events, yield instability, and market fluctuations. Effective risk zoning is therefore crucial for actuarially fair and sustainable agricultural insurance. However, in multi-branch systems such as Türkiye’s Agricultural Insurance Pool (TARSIM), different insurance lines such as Crop, Greenhouse, Livestock, and Income Protection, employ distinct criteria and coding schemes, often resulting in inconsistent regional classifications. This study introduces a novel Machine Learning-Based Cross-Branch Consistency Framework to evaluate and harmonize agricultural risk zoning across these branches. Using official 2025 TARSIM datasets covering 71,902 localities, ordinal risk codes (A–Z) were encoded and analyzed through correlation statistics, clustering, and supervised learning. The results revealed strong interdependencies among high-intensity perils such as hail and storm across open-field and greenhouse insurance lines (r > 0.98), and high spatial synchrony among staple crop risks (r ≈ 0.99), confirming the existence of shared systemic exposure. K-Means clustering identified five statistically robust regional risk archetypes that transcend administrative boundaries and branch definitions. A novel Cross-Branch Consistency Index (CBCI) was developed to quantify inter-branch alignment, highlighting regions of both coherence and discrepancy in current zoning logic. Supervised learning validation using Random Forest achieved over 95% classification accuracy, demonstrating the reliability and reproducibility of the ML-derived zones. The findings support a transition from fragmented, expert-driven zoning to an integrated, data-driven risk management framework. The proposed methodology enhances actuarial fairness, transparency, and policy efficiency, providing a scalable foundation for modernizing state-supported agricultural insurance systems and advancing climate-resilient risk governance.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özden, C. (2026). Harmonizing Agricultural Insurance Risk Zones with Machine Learning: A Cross-Branch Framework for Türkiye. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 244–255. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1822325

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adriani, I. R., Ekasasmita, W., Afriansyah, D., & Zahra, K. (2025). The agricultural insurance: Explore trends and advances over the last two decades. Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal, 7(2), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v7i2.9018
  2. Biagini, L. (2022). Applications of machine learning for the ratemaking in agricultural insurances (arXiv:2212.03114). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.03114
  3. Burhan, H. A. (2023). Agricultural insurance and natural disasters: An assessment of the financial performance of the Turkish agricultural insurance pool (TARSIM) through selected criteria. Ardahan Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 126–136.
  4. Ghahari, A., Newlands, N. K., Lyubchich, V., & Gel, Y. R. (2019). Deep learning at the interface of agricultural insurance risk and spatio-temporal uncertainty in weather extremes. North American Actuarial Journal, 23(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10920277.2019.1633928
  5. Jung, M., Boucher, T. M., Wood, S. A., Folberth, C., Wironen, M., & Thornton, P. (2024). A global clustering of terrestrial food production systems. PLoS ONE, 19(2), e0296846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296846
  6. Mahohoho, B. (2024). The extreme machine learning actuarial intelligent agricultural insurance based automated underwriting model. Open Journal of Statistics, 14, 598–633. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2024.145027
  7. Martins, G., & Signorini, G. (2025). Enhancing crop insurance analysis with agricultural zoning data. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 63, e284274. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2025.284274
  8. Sumi, M., & Manju, P. S. (2024). Innovative approaches to agricultural risk with machine learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(7), 1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.01507104
  9. TARSIM. (2025). Statistical Bulletin. https://istatistik.tarimorman.gov.tr/Sayfa/Detay/2115 (Erişim tarihi: 1 Ocak 2026).
  10. Venturini, R. E. (2025). Revolução no seguro agrícola: A integração de IA e blockchain para um setor mais eficiente e resiliente. Revista Sistemática, 15(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.56238/rcsv15n3-004
  11. Xie, J., Singhapreecha, S., Chinnakum, W., & Autchariyapanitkul, K. (2025). Banana production risk zoning and copula based income insurance rate determination: A case study of Guangdong, China. Journal of Cannabis Research, 9(01), 3816–3828.
  12. Zeng, S., Qi, B., & Wang, M. (2022). Agricultural insurance and agricultural economic growth: The case of Zhejiang Province in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13062. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013062
  13. Zhichkin, K. A., Nosov, V. V., & Zhichkina, L. N. (2023). Agricultural insurance, risk management and sustainable development. Agriculture, 13(7), 1317.
  14. Zuo, Y., Ji, M., Yang, J., Zhenjin, L., & Wang, J. (2025). Risk assessment of corn borer based on feature optimization and weighted spatial clustering: A case study in Shandong Province, China. Scientific Reports, 15, 28036.