Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Early Feathering Observations and First-Clutch Hatch Results in Chicks of Red Mosaic Canaries: A Descriptive Study in 10 Pairs without Extra Pigment Supplementation

Pages
415–420
Publication Date
2026-05-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From the first clutch of 10 pairs, 37 eggs and 26 hatched chicks were recorded, giving an overall hatchability of 70.3%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to describe the early feather appearance of chicks obtained from phenotypically red mosaic canaries kept under routine breeder feeding without added canthaxanthin or beta-carotene, and also to summarize first-clutch reproductive data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The parent birds were purchased after the adult mask and red color pattern had already become visible, and pairing was made around 15 February.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From the first clutch of 10 pairs, 37 eggs and 26 hatched chicks were recorded, giving an overall hatchability of 70.3%.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Canary · Red mosaic · Red factor

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the early feather appearance of chicks obtained from phenotypically red mosaic canaries kept under routine breeder feeding without added canthaxanthin or beta-carotene, and also to summarize first-clutch reproductive data. Ten breeding pairs of red mosaic canaries kept under private breeder conditions were included. The parent birds were purchased after the adult mask and red color pattern had already become visible, and pairing was made around 15 February. During the study, birds received ad libitum a standard ration composed of imported egg soft food and an imported canary seed mixture. No external red pigment source was added in any period. Egg and hatch records from the first clutch were taken from breeder logs and converted into reproductive indicators. During early feathering, all chicks were checked for visible red mask and for any reddish tone in the plumage. From the first clutch of 10 pairs, 37 eggs and 26 hatched chicks were recorded, giving an overall hatchability of 70.3%. Mean egg number and hatched chick number per pair were 3.7 and 2.6, respectively. In none of the 26 chicks, visible red facial mask or general reddish feathering was seen during early feathering. All chicks showed a yellowish-white early feather appearance. These findings suggest that, under routine breeder feeding without added pigment supplementation, the adult-type red mask of red mosaic canaries is not visibly expressed in the early feathering period of first-clutch chicks.

Özet

The aim of this study was to describe the early feather appearance of chicks obtained from phenotypically red mosaic canaries kept under routine breeder feeding without added canthaxanthin or beta-carotene, and also to summarize first-clutch reproductive data. Ten breeding pairs of red mosaic canaries kept under private breeder conditions were included. The parent birds were purchased after the adult mask and red color pattern had already become visible, and pairing was made around 15 February. During the study, birds received ad libitum a standard ration composed of imported egg soft food and an imported canary seed mixture. No external red pigment source was added in any period. Egg and hatch records from the first clutch were taken from breeder logs and converted into reproductive indicators. During early feathering, all chicks were checked for visible red mask and for any reddish tone in the plumage. From the first clutch of 10 pairs, 37 eggs and 26 hatched chicks were recorded, giving an overall hatchability of 70.3%. Mean egg number and hatched chick number per pair were 3.7 and 2.6, respectively. In none of the 26 chicks, visible red facial mask or general reddish feathering was seen during early feathering. All chicks showed a yellowish-white early feather appearance. These findings suggest that, under routine breeder feeding without added pigment supplementation, the adult-type red mask of red mosaic canaries is not visibly expressed in the early feathering period of first-clutch chicks.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mevliyaoğulları, E. (2026). Early Feathering Observations and First-Clutch Hatch Results in Chicks of Red Mosaic Canaries: A Descriptive Study in 10 Pairs without Extra Pigment Supplementation. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 415–420. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1917749

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cadieu, J. C., Cadieu, N., & Lauga, J. (1995). Local enhancement and seed choice in the juvenile canary, Serinus canarius. Animal Behaviour, 50(3), 793-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80139-1
  2. Demirci, M. I., & Mevliyaoğulları, E. (2023). Comparative nutritional analysis of domestic and imported commercial canary egg food and mixed seeds based diets. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 25(3), eRBCA-2023-1809. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2023-1809
  3. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (2014). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of canthaxanthin as a feed additive for poultry and for ornamental birds and ornamental fish. EFSA Journal, 12(1), 3527. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3527
  4. Esatbeyoglu, T., & Rimbach, G. (2017). Canthaxanthin: From molecule to function. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 61(6), 1600469. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600469
  5. Harper, E. J., & Turner, C. L. (2000). Nutrition and energetics of the canary (Serinus canarius). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 126(3), 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0491(00)00210-8
  6. Harper, E. J., Lambert, L., & Moodie, N. (1998). The comparative nutrition of two passerine species: The canary (Serinus canarius) and the zebra finch (Poephila guttata). The Journal of Nutrition, 128(12 Suppl), 2684S-2685S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/128.12.2684S
  7. Lopes, R. J., Johnson, J. D., Toomey, M. B., Ferreira, M. S., Araujo, P. M., Melo-Ferreira, J., Andersson, L., Hill, G. E., Corbo, J. C., & Carneiro, M. (2016). Genetic basis for red coloration in birds. Current Biology, 26(11), 1427-1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.076
  8. Mevliyaoğulları, E. (2025). Comparison of the effects of different imported commercial bird egg foods on the reproductive performance of Yorkshire canaries. In 5th International Animal Nutrition Congress (pp. 119-124).
  9. Mevliyaoğulları, E. (2026). Physicochemical characterization of an imported extruded pigeon feed as a first step towards local production in Türkiye. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 28(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2025-2169
  10. Mevliyaoğulları, E., Demirci, M., & Karslı, M. A. (2021). Kanaryalarda damızlık seçimi ve beslenme [Breeding stock selection and nutrition in canaries]. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.953206
  11. Mevliyaoğulları, E., Karslı, M. A., & Mert, B. (2023). Utilizing surplus bread as an ingredient in dog food: Evaluating baking and extrusion processing on physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility performance. Journal of Cereal Science, 113, 103741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2023.103741
  12. Özkök, A. O. (2022). The effect of artificial insemination on egg fertilization at different times of nest construction in gloster canaries. International Journal of Science Letters, 4(2), 302-311. https://doi.org/10.38058/ijsl.1152442
  13. Perez-Beato, O. (2008). Fundamentals of color genetics in canaries: Reproduction and control. RoseDog Books. ISBN: 978-1-4349-9074-7.