Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5

Genetic and Environmental Sources of Variation for Lactation Milk Yield in Kilis Goats

Yunus Arzık(Uluslararası Hayvancılık Araştırma ve Eğitim Merkezi Müdürlüğü)0000-0002-3068-8155
Sabri Gül(HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8202-6794
Sedat Behrem(AKSARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7351-1229
Mahmut Keskin(Hatay Mustafa Kemal University)0000-0002-8147-2477
Pages
814–819
Publication Date
2026-09-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study provides baseline genetic parameters that may support the development of sustainable dairy-oriented breeding programs for the Kilis goat breed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Kilis goat is one of the most important indigenous dairy goat breeds in Türkiye and plays a significant role in milk production systems of the southeastern region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, the present study aimed to estimate variance components and genetic parameters for lactation milk yield in Kilis goats using a repeatability animal model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study provides baseline genetic parameters that may support the development of sustainable dairy-oriented breeding programs for the Kilis goat breed.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kilis goat · Lactation milk yield · Heritability

Abstract

The Kilis goat is one of the most important indigenous dairy goat breeds in Türkiye and plays a significant role in milk production systems of the southeastern region. Despite its economic importance, information regarding genetic parameters for milk production traits remains limited. Therefore, the present study aimed to estimate variance components and genetic parameters for lactation milk yield in Kilis goats using a repeatability animal model. A total of 3,655 lactation milk yield records collected from 1,698 does and a pedigree comprising 1,815 animals were analyzed using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method implemented in WOMBAT software. Herd-year subclasses were included as fixed effects, while additive genetic and permanent environmental effects were fitted as random effects. The mean lactation milk yield was 402.23±84.02 kg. The estimated additive genetic, permanent environmental, residual, and phenotypic variances were 733.09±250.29, 0.01±264.20, 6298.76±187.39, and 7031.86±167.08 kg², respectively. Heritability for lactation milk yield was estimated as 0.10±0.03, indicating that additive genetic effects accounted for approximately 10.4% of the total phenotypic variation. The permanent environmental ratio was estimated to be negligible (0.00±0.00), resulting in a repeatability estimate equal to the heritability estimate (r=0.10). The results revealed that environmental and management factors constituted the major sources of variation in lactation milk yield, while a measurable but relatively low additive genetic component was present. These findings suggest that genetic improvement of milk yield in Kilis goats is possible through selection, although substantial gains will also require improvements in management practices and recording systems. The study provides baseline genetic parameters that may support the development of sustainable dairy-oriented breeding programs for the Kilis goat breed.

Özet

The Kilis goat is one of the most important indigenous dairy goat breeds in Türkiye and plays a significant role in milk production systems of the southeastern region. Despite its economic importance, information regarding genetic parameters for milk production traits remains limited. Therefore, the present study aimed to estimate variance components and genetic parameters for lactation milk yield in Kilis goats using a repeatability animal model. A total of 3,655 lactation milk yield records collected from 1,698 does and a pedigree comprising 1,815 animals were analyzed using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method implemented in WOMBAT software. Herd-year subclasses were included as fixed effects, while additive genetic and permanent environmental effects were fitted as random effects. The mean lactation milk yield was 402.23±84.02 kg. The estimated additive genetic, permanent environmental, residual, and phenotypic variances were 733.09±250.29, 0.01±264.20, 6298.76±187.39, and 7031.86±167.08 kg², respectively. Heritability for lactation milk yield was estimated as 0.10±0.03, indicating that additive genetic effects accounted for approximately 10.4% of the total phenotypic variation. The permanent environmental ratio was estimated to be negligible (0.00±0.00), resulting in a repeatability estimate equal to the heritability estimate (r=0.10). The results revealed that environmental and management factors constituted the major sources of variation in lactation milk yield, while a measurable but relatively low additive genetic component was present. These findings suggest that genetic improvement of milk yield in Kilis goats is possible through selection, although substantial gains will also require improvements in management practices and recording systems. The study provides baseline genetic parameters that may support the development of sustainable dairy-oriented breeding programs for the Kilis goat breed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arzık, Y., Gül, S., Behrem, S., Keskin, M., Karaman, R. (2026). Genetic and Environmental Sources of Variation for Lactation Milk Yield in Kilis Goats. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5, 814–819. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1990731

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Analla, M., Jiménez-Gamero, I., Muñoz-Serrano, A., Serradilla, J. M., & Falagán, A. (1996). Estimation of genetic parameters for milk yield and fat and protein contents of milk from Murciano-Granadina goats. Journal of Dairy Science, 79(10), 1895–1898.
  2. Arzik, Y., Behrem, S., Sakar, Ç. M., & Unal, I. (2024). Genetic parameter estimation of preweaning growth traits in Akkaraman sheep. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 56(9), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-04239-w
  3. Arzik, Y., Kizilaslan, M., Behrem, S., Piel, L. M. W., White, S. N., & Çınar, M. U. (2025). Exploring Genetic Factors Associated with Moniezia spp. Tapeworm Resistance in Central Anatolian Merino Sheep via GWAS Approach. Animals, 15(6), 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15060812
  4. Ehsaninia, J., Zandi, M. B., Taned, M., & Bagheripour, A. (2025). Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic trends for milk production traits in Murciano-Granadina goats. Animal, 19(8), 101582.
  5. Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. (1996). C. 1996. In Introduction to quantitative genetics (Vol. 4). Essex: Benjamin Cummings.
  6. Keskin, M., Gül, S., Biçer, O., & Daşkıran, İ. (2017). Some reproductive, lactation, and kid growth characteristics of Kilis goats under semiintensive conditions. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 41(2), 248-254.
  7. Gül, S., Arzik, Y., Kizilaslan, M., Behrem, S., & Keskin, M. (2023). Heritability and environmental influence on pre-weaning traits in Kilis goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 55(2), 85.
  8. Gül, S., Keskin, M., Kaya, Ş., & Dikme, M. (2024). Investigation of some environmental factors on reproductive characteristics, milk traits and Kleiber ratios of Kilis goats reared in the fertile crescent of Türkiye. Livestock Studies, 64(1), 24–31.
  9. International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR). (2021). ICAR Guidelines – Section 16: Dairy Sheep and Goats. ICAR, Utrecht, The Netherlands. https://www.icar.org/Guidelines/16-Dairy-Sheep-and-Goats.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2026).
  10. Karaköse, İ., & Gündüz, Z. (2025). Maternal haplotype diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Damascus, Kilis, Hatay, and Kil goat breeds: insight from mtDNA D-loop sequences in the Fertile Crescent. Archives Animal Breeding, 68(4), 607–618.
  11. Korkmaz Aĝaoĝlu, Ö., & Ertuĝrul, O. (2012). Assessment of genetic diversity, genetic relationship and bottleneck using microsatellites in some native Turkish goat breeds. Small Ruminant Research, 105(1–3), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.12.005
  12. Lynch, M., & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits (Vol. 1, pp. 535-557). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
  13. Meyer, K. (2007). WOMBAT: a tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B., 8(11), 815–821. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815
  14. Mrode, R. (2014). Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. CABI.
  15. Mucha, S., Mrode, R., Coffey, M., & Conington, J. (2014). Estimation of genetic parameters for milk yield across lactations in mixed-breed dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(4), 2455–2461. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7319
  16. Mucha, S., Mrode, R., Coffey, M., Kizilaslan, M., Desire, S., & Conington, J. (2018). Genome-wide association study of conformation and milk yield in mixed-breed dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(3), 2213–2225. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12919
  17. Mucha, S., Tortereau, F., Doeschl-Wilson, A., Rupp, R., & Conington, J. (2022). Animal Board Invited Review: Meta-analysis of genetic parameters for resilience and efficiency traits in goats and sheep. Animal, 16(3), 100456.
  18. Rout, P. K., Matika, O., Kaushik, R., Dige, M. S., Dass, G., Singh, M. K., & Bhusan, S. (2018). Genetic analysis of growth parameters and survival potential of Jamunapari goats in semiarid tropics. Small Ruminant Research, 165, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.04.002
  19. Şen, U., Şirin, E., Filik, A. G., Önder, H., Piwczyński, D., & Kolenda, M. (2021). Growth and slaughter characteristics of weaning male kids of turkish native goat breeds. Animals, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102788
  20. Tatar, A. M., Tuncer, S. S., & Sireli, H. D. (2019). Comparison of yield characteristics of Damascus and Kilis goats in dry climatic conditions. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 51(2), 61-66.
  21. TUIK. (2025). Livestock production. Turkish Statistical Institute. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/Home/Index.