SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Comparison of heat gain values obtained for building structures with real and constant properties

Hasan Oktay(BATMAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0917-7844
Zeki Argunhan(BITLIS EREN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3349-3409
Recep Yumrutaş(Gaziantep University)0000-0001-9006-198X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2019-12-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the assumptions are not realistic in a significant number of cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The magnitude of energy consumption due to heating and cooling of buildings has led to the demand for increasing the thermal performance of building structures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In previous study, 102 new wall samples were produced, their thermophysical properties were tested and expressions among these properties are obtained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the assumptions are not realistic in a significant number of cases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Building structure · thermophysical properties · heat gain

Özet

The magnitude of energy consumption due to heating and cooling of buildings has led to the demand for increasing the thermal performance of building structures. Many investigations are presented in literature arguing to find the effect of each thermophysical property on the thermal characteristics of building components, while the properties have been assumed as independent of each other. In this context, this paper focuses on the effect of each property on heat gain value utilizing relationships between the measurement values of thermophysical properties of building structures. In previous study, 102 new wall samples were produced, their thermophysical properties were tested and expressions among these properties are obtained. In this study, the heat gain values through the structures are computed using solution of transient heat transfer problem by using both the obtained expressions between the thermophysical properties and assumptions proposed from the literature. Results obtained for varying and constant thermophysical properties have been compared with those values presented in literature. The results show that the assumptions are not realistic in a significant number of cases. Moreover, if one of the thermophysical properties of a material is known, heat gain values can be calculated easily for the selected wall or roof types.

🔖

Cite This Article

Oktay, H., Argunhan, Z., Yumrutaş, R. (2019). Comparison of heat gain values obtained for building structures with real and constant properties. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 8 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.645016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Bansal K., Chowdhury S., Gopal M.R. 2008. Development of CLTD values for buildings located in Kolkata, India, Applied Thermal Engineering, 28: 1127–1137.
  2. Moosavi L., Mahyuddin N., Ghafar N.A., Ismail M.A. 2014. Thermal performance of atria: An overview of natural ventilation effective designs, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34: 654–670.
  3. Yumrutas R, Unsal M, Kanoglu M. 2005. Periodic solution of transient heat flow through multilayer walls and flat roofs by complex finite Fourier transform technique, Building and Environment, 40: 1117–1125.
  4. Yumrutas R, Kaska O, Yıldırım E. 2007. Estimation of total equivalent temperature difference values for multilayer walls and flat roofs by using periodic solution, Building and Environment, 42 (5):1878–1885.
  5. Kaska O, Yumrutas R, Arpa O. 2009. Theoretical and experimental investigation of total equivalent temperature difference (TETD) values for building walls and flat roofs in Turkey, Applied Energy 86: 737–747.
  6. Ulgen K. 2002. Experimental and theoretical investigation of effects of wall's thermophysical properties on time lag and decrement factor, Energy and Building, 34: 273–278.
  7. Vijayalakshmi M.M., Natarajan E., Shanmugasundaram V. 2006. Thermal behaviour of building wall elements, Journal Applied Sciences 15: 3128–3133.
  8. Al-Sanea, S. A., Zedan M.F., Al-Hussain S.N. 2012. Effect of thermal mass on performance of insulated building walls and the concept of energy savings potential, Applied Energy, 89: 430–442.
  9. Al-Sanea, S. A., Zedan M.F. 2011. Improving thermal performance of building walls by optimizing insulation layer distribution and thickness for same thermal mass, Applied Energy, 88: 3113–3124.
  10. Asan H. 2000. Investigation of wall’s optimum insulation position from maximum time lag and minimum decrement factor point of view, Energy and Building, 32: 197–203.
  11. Asan H. 1998. Effects of Wall's insulation thickness and position on time lag and decrement factor, Energy and Building, 28: 299-305.
  12. Ozel M. 2014. Effect of insulation location on dynamic heat-transfer characteristics of building external walls and optimization of insulation thickness, Energy and Building, 72: 288–295.
  13. Zhang, Y., Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, X. 2013. Exploring buildings’ secrets: The ideal thermophysical properties of a building’s wall for energy conservation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 65: 265-273.
  14. Asan H. 2006. Numerical computation of time lags and decrement factors for different building materials, Building and Environment, 41: 615–620.
  15. Asan H., Sancaktar Y.S. 1998. Effects of Wall’s thermophysical properties on time lag and decrement factor, Energy and Building, 28:159–166.
  16. Jin X., Zhang X., Cao Y., Wang G. 2012. Thermal performance evaluation of the wall using heat flux time lag and decrement factor, Energy and Building, 47: 369–374.
  17. Zhang Y., Lin K., Zhang Q., Di H. 2006. Ideal thermophysical properties for free-cooling (or heating) buildings with constant thermal physical property material, Energy and Building, 38: 1164–1170.
  18. Zhang Y., Dua K., Hec J., Yanga L., Lia Y., Lia S. 2014. Impact factors analysis on the thermal performance of hollow block wall, Energy and Building, 75: 330–341.19. Kontoleon K.J., Theodosiou Th.G., Tsikaloudaki K.G. 2013. The influence of concrete density and conductivity on walls’ thermal inertia parameters under a variety of masonry and insulation placements, Applied Energy, 112: 325–337.
  19. Barrios G., Huelsz G., Rechtman R., Rojas J 2011. Wall/roof thermal performance differences between air-conditioned and non air-conditioned rooms, Energy and Building, 43: 219–223.
  20. Khan M.I. 2002. Factors affecting the thermal properties of concrete and applicability of its prediction models, Building and Environment, 37: 607–614.
  21. Oktay H., Yumrutas R., Akpolat A. 2015. Mechanical and thermophysical properties of lightweight aggregate concretes, Construction and Building Materials, 96: 217–225.
  22. Unal O., Uygunoglu T., Yildiz A. 2007. Investigation of properties of low-strength lightweight concrete for thermal insulation, Building and Environment, 42: 584–590.24. Canakci H., Demirboga R., Karakoc B., Sirin O. 2007. Thermal conductivity of limestone from Gaziantep (Turkey), Building and Environment, 42: 1777–1782.
  23. ACI Committee 122 2002. Guide to Thermal Properties of Concrete and Masonry Systems, American Concrete Institution, ISBN 9780870310850.
  24. ASHRAE 1993, ASHRAE handbook-fundamentals, ASHRAE, Atlanta.
  25. Duffie J.A., Beckman W.A. 2013. Solar engineering of thermal process, fourth ed., Wiley, New York.
  26. ASM International Materials Properties Database Committee 2002. Thermal Properties of Metals, ISBN 0-87170-768-3.
  27. Gagliano A., Patania F., Nocera F., Signorello C.2014. Assessment of the dynamic thermal performance of massive buildings, Energy and Building, 72: 361–370.