Journals / Journal of Education and Future / 2013 / Sayı: 4

-

Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek

Pages
51–64
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that as the level and length of time digital teaching increases, students’ attitudes towards the lessons show more positive results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the implementation of technology enhanced learning which is based on digital resources and its benefits specifically in a reading course at an English prep school.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Positive impacts are evident if the lesson is carefully planned, structured and integrated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that as the level and length of time digital teaching increases, students’ attitudes towards the lessons show more positive results.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digital teaching and learning · digital resources · technology

Abstract

This paper examines the implementation of technology enhanced learning which is based on digital resources and its benefits specifically in a reading course at an English prep school. The paper describes the findings that contribute to the impact of technology tailored teaching on students’ learning. Positive impacts are evident if the lesson is carefully planned, structured and integrated. In particular, it provides that there is a direct relationship between the way lessons are presented with the use of digital resources, and the progress students showed during a limited period of time. By no means, technology guarantees significant change in the students’ progress in learning English. This study employed a structured questionnaire, classroom observations, and student interviews to examine the impact of technology tailored teaching. The results indicated that as the level and length of time digital teaching increases, students’ attitudes towards the lessons show more positive results. The data collected in this study support the idea that technology combined with effective instruction can show positive results for students and teachers. However, although the data are promising, they are preliminary

🔖

Cite This Article

MUNZUR, Z. (2013). -. Journal of Education and Future, Sayı: 4, 51–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/137623

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AECT (1977). The Definition of Educational Technology, Task Force on Definition and Terminology, Washington, D.C. pp 1,2. Barad, D. P.(2009),Pedagogical Issues Related to Speaking and Listening Skills & Sound Editing Software, AudacityLT Weekly, Online Journal, Vol.1(27). Barad, D.P.(2010), Experimenting ICT In English Language and Literature, Asia CALL Online Journal. Issue Vol.4 No:1. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer-assisted language learning. In R. Kaplan, (Ed.). Handbook of applied linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Dexter, S.L., Anderson, R.E., & Becker, H. J., (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221-239.
  3. Fraley, L.E., & Vargas E.A. (1975). Academic tradition and instructional technology. The Journal of Higher Education, 46, 1-15.
  4. Gass, S., (1997). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition edited by Catherine J. Doughty, Michael H. Long, Douhgty 1998.
  5. Graddol, D. (1997).
  6. The Future of English, The British Council, 1st ed., p 2. Hanson-Smith, E., (2006), http://webpages.csus.edu/~hansonsm/CoP_Resources.html.
  7. Community of Practice Resources, Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Chapter 1: Definition. In Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: engaging critical thinking, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Long, M.H., (1981).
  8. INPUT, INTERACTION, ACQUISITION, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 379, Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition pages 259–278, December 1981.
  9. Long, M.H., (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research, Diane Larsen- Freeman and Micheal H. Long, New York, NY: Longman Inc., p.398. Long, M.H., Kanagy,R. & Falodun,J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. in G.Crookes & S.M.Gass (Eds.) Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory & Practice. (pp.9-34).
  10. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Owsten, R.D., (1997). the World Wide Web: A Technology to Enhance Teaching and Learning, Research New and Comment March issue, p.27. Pica,T., (1994). Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal About Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes? Language Learning Volume 44, Issue 3, pages 493–527, September 1994.
  11. Robert J. Blake, Brave new digital classroom technology an