Journals / Journal of Education and Future / 2016 / Sayı: 10

Guided Inquiry-Based Electricity Experiments: Pre-service Elementary Science Teachers’ Difficulties

Pages
71–93
Publication Date
2016-07-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

How researchers and instructors can decrease the number of the difficulties that PSTs face in the inquiry activities or experiments by taking some precautions is also discussed in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Renewed primary and elementary schools science curriculum has been implemented in Turkey for three years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 80 PSTs participated in the study and they performed guided inquiry-based electricity experiments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:How researchers and instructors can decrease the number of the difficulties that PSTs face in the inquiry activities or experiments by taking some precautions is also discussed in this study.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:zorluklar · elektrik · rehberli-araştırma sorgulama deneyleri

Abstract

Renewed primary and elementary schools science curriculum has been implemented in Turkey for three years. In this curriculum students are required to learn school science subjects by various inquiry-based learning activities or experiments. However, whether pre-service elementary science teachers (PSTs) are completely ready to implement this curriculum by considering some levels of inquiry is still not known. This study aims to explore PSTs’ difficulties in performing guided inquiry-based physic experiments and their perceptions about physics laboratory. A total of 80 PSTs participated in the study and they performed guided inquiry-based electricity experiments. Data were collected through an open-ended questionnaire, the interview and field note. Qualitative content analysis was performed to analyze the data obtained. The results of this study showed that some PSTs faced difficulty in performing the experiments due to their teacher-centered previous learning experiences, insufficient content knowledge about physics, insufficient inquiry skills, poor adaptation to inquiry activities and low-level collaboration. In addition, the majority of PSTs perceived physics laboratory as a place where the physics knowledge was confirmed. As a conclusion, this study showed that most PSTs had some difficulties in performing the guided inquiry-based electricity experiments. How researchers and instructors can decrease the number of the difficulties that PSTs face in the inquiry activities or experiments by taking some precautions is also discussed in this study.

Özet

Yenilenen İlköğretim Kurumları Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı üç yıldır Türkiye’de uygulanmaktadır. Bu programda öğrencilerin feni çeşitli sorgulayıcı öğrenme etkinlikleri ya da deneyleri ile öğrenmeleri istenmektedir. Fakat fen bilimleri dersi öğretmen adaylarının, bu öğretim programını sorgulayıcı öğrenmenin bazı düzeylerini düşünerek uygulamaya tam olarak hazır olup olmadıkları bilinmemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı fen bilimleri dersi öğretmen adaylarının elektrik konusuna yönelik rehberli-araştırma sorgulama deneylerini yaparken karşılaşmış oldukları zorlukları ve fizik laboratuvarı hakkındaki algılarını tespit etmektir. Çalışmaya 80 fen bilimleri dersi öğretmen adayı katılmıştır ve elektrik konusuna yönelik rehberli-araştırma sorgulama deneylerini yapmışlardır. Açık uçlu anket, mülakat ve gözlem bu çalışmada kullanılan veri toplama araçlarıdır. Elde edilen verileri analiz etmek için nitel içerik analizi uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre bazı öğretmen adayları deneyleri yaparken geçmiş öğretmen merkezli öğrenme deneyimlerinden, yetersiz fizik alan bilgilerinden, yetersiz sorgulama becerilerinden, problemlerinden ve düşük seviyedeki işbirliklerinden dolayı sıkıntılar yaşamışlardır. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının çoğu fizik laboratuvarını bilginin onaylandığı bir yer olarak düşünmüşlerdir. Sonuçta bu çalışma çoğu fen bilimleri dersi öğretmen adayının elektrik konusuna yönelik rehberli-araştırma sorgulama deneylerinde zorlandığını göstermiştir. Bu çalışmada araştırmacıların ve öğretmenlerin, öğretmen adaylarının rehberli-araştırma sorgulama deneylerinde karşılaştıkları zorlukların sayısını bazı önlemler alarak nasıl azaltabileceği de tartışılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPUCU, S. (2016). Guided Inquiry-Based Electricity Experiments: Pre-service Elementary Science Teachers’ Difficulties. Journal of Education and Future, Sayı: 10, 71–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/137574

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
  2. Areepattamannil, S. (2012). Effects of inquiry-based science instruction on science achievement and interest in science: evidence from Qatar. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(2), 134-146.
  3. Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26-29.
  4. Banerjee, A. (2010). Teaching science using guided ınquiry as the central theme: a professional development model for high school science teachers. Science Educator, 19(2), 1-9.
  5. Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
  6. Bhattacharyya, S., Volk, T., & Lumpe, A. (2009). The influence of an extensive inquiry-based field experience on pre-service elementary student teachers’ science teaching beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 199-218.
  7. Blue, J., & Jacob, J. (2009). Student perceptions of an introductory physics course. Proceedings of the 2009 Physics Education Research Conference. (pp. 101-04).
  8. AIP Press Brown, S. L., & Melear, C. T. (2006). Investigation of secondary science teachers’ beliefs and practices after authentic inquiry-based experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 938-962.
  9. Campbell, T., Zhang, D., & Neilson, D. (2011). Model based inquiry in the high school physics classroom: an exploratory study of implementation and outcomes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 258-269.
  10. Capps, D. K., & Crawford, D. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497-526.
  11. Choi, S., & Ramsey, J. (2009).Constructing elementary teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and practical knowledge through an inquiry-based elementary science course. School Science and Mathematics, 109(6), 313-324.
  12. Duran, L. B., McArthur, J., & Van-Hook, S. (2004). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of an inquiry-based physics course. Journal of Science Teacher Education 15(2), 155-171.
  13. Duran, E., Ballone-Duran, L., Haney J., & Beltyukova, S. (2009). The impact of a professional development program integrating informal science education on early childhood teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs about inquiry-based science teaching. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 53-70.
  14. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in educat