Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 3

Determination of Radon Concentrations in Some Schools in Tatvan District of Bitlis Province

Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings highlight the need for continued monitoring and preventive measures to ensure radiological safety in educational environments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Schools are essential social infrastructures where children spend a significant part of their time and require close attention to ensure a safe and healthy environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 222Rn concentration measurements and annual effective dose calculations were conducted in 20 schools in Tatvan district of Bitlis province using LR-115 (Type-2) nuclear track detectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings highlight the need for continued monitoring and preventive measures to ensure radiological safety in educational environments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Annual effective dose · Bitlis · LR-115

Abstract

Schools are essential social infrastructures where children spend a significant part of their time and require close attention to ensure a safe and healthy environment. In this study, 222Rn concentration measurements and annual effective dose calculations were conducted in 20 schools in Tatvan district of Bitlis province using LR-115 (Type-2) nuclear track detectors. Measurements were conducted over two periods: spring (March, April, May) and autumn (September, October, November). Indoor radon concentrations ranged from 23.39 to 222.06 Bq/m³ in spring and 42.68 to 308.38 Bq/m³ in autumn, with arithmetic means of 83.68 Bq/m³ and 126.49 Bq/m³, respectively. In addition, the effect of floor level on indoor radon concentration was investigated. A clear floor-level variation was observed, with ground-floor rooms (mean: 120.77 Bq/m³) showing higher radon levels than upper-floor rooms (mean: 89.40 Bq/m³). Moreover, the annual effective dose due to radon exposure for teachers and students in the schools were estimated to range from 0.19 and 1.51 mSv/y. Annual effective dose measurements showed that although most schools fall within acceptable radiological ranges, two schools (S1 and S5) recorded annual effective doses slightly above the 1.15 mSv/y global average reported by UNSCEAR (2000). These findings highlight the need for continued monitoring and preventive measures to ensure radiological safety in educational environments.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydin, B. B., Yorgun, N. Y., Özdemir, Ö. F., Yıldız, H. E. (2025). Determination of Radon Concentrations in Some Schools in Tatvan District of Bitlis Province. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 14 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1654172

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. J. M. Samet, “Radon and lung cancer,” JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 745–758, May 1989, doi: 10.1093/jnci/81.10.745.
  2. C. Taşköprü, M. İçhedef, and M. M. Saç, “Diurnal, monthly, and seasonal variations of indoor radon concentrations concerning meteorological parameters,” Environ Monit Assess, vol. 195, no. 1, p. 25, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10596-6.
  3. M. Yılmaz, M. Gürcan, and Y. Güral, “A correlation assessment of 222 Rn gas measurements from the East Anatolian fault zone,” Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–84, 2020, Accessed: Sep. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/jphcfum
  4. F. Loffredo, I. Opoku-Ntim, G. Meo, and M. Quarto, “Indoor radon monitoring in kindergarten and primary schools in South Italy,” Atmosphere (Basel), vol. 13, no. 3, p. 478, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/atmos13030478.
  5. J. Madureira, I. Paciência, J. Rufo, A. Moreira, E. de Oliveira Fernandes, and A. Pereira, “Radon in indoor air of primary schools: determinant factors, their variability and effective dose,” Environ Geochem Health, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 523–533, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10653-015-9737-5.
  6. G. Degu Belete and Y. Alemu Anteneh, “General overview of radon studies in health hazard perspectives,” J Oncol, vol. 2021, pp. 1–7, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/6659795.
  7. A. Robertson, J. Allen, R. Laney, and A. Curnow, “The cellular and molecular carcinogenic effects of radon exposure: A review,” Int J Mol Sci, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 14024–14063, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.3390/ijms140714024.
  8. G. M. Kendall and T. J. Smith, “Doses from radon and its decay products to children,” Journal of Radiological Protection, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 241–256, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/25/3/002.
  9. S. Q. Othman, A. H. Ahmed, and S. I. Mohammed, “Environmental health risks of radon exposure inside selected building factories in Erbil city, Iraq,” Int J Environ Anal Chem, vol. 104, no. 16, pp. 4711–4725, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/03067319.2022.2107923.
  10. H. A. Bulut and R. Şahin, “Radon, concrete, buildings and human health-A review study,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 510, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14020510.
  11. W. W. Nazaroff, B. A. Moed, and R. G. Sextro, “Soil as a Source of Indoor Radon: Generation, Migration, and Entry,” in Radon and Its Products in Indoor Air, W. W. Nazaroff and A. V. Nero, Eds., John Wiley & Sons, 1988, pp. 57–111.
  12. World Health Organization, WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon A Public Health Perspective. Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  13. United States Environmental Protection Agency, “EPA Assessment of Risks from Radon in Homes,” Washington, US, Jun. 2003.
  14. European Commission, “Laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom,” Brussels, Belgium, Dec. 2013.
  15. A. Baran, “Denizli ve çevresindeki termal alanlarda bina içi radon düzeylerinin belirlenmesi,” Yüksek lisans tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir, Türkiye, 2013.
  16. M. Değerlier, “Adana ili ve çevresinin çevresel doğal radyoaktivitesinin saptanması ve doğal radyasyonların yıllık etkin doz eşdeğerinin bulunması,” Doktora tezi, Adana, Türkiye, 2007.
  17. H. Erzen Yıldız, “Van ilindeki konutlarda radon gazının zamana bağlı değişimi ve akciğer kanseri ile ilişkisinin araştırılması,” Doktora tezi, Van, Türkiye, 2023.
  18. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources and effects of ionizing radiation United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes volume ı: sources, vol. I. New York, US, 2000.
  19. Y. Örgün and N. Çelebi, “Radyasyon, radon (Rn) ve toplum sağlığı,” TMMOB Jeoloji Mühendisleri Odası, Tıbbi Jeoloji ve İnsan Sağlığı, Haber Bülteni, Ocak-Haziran, pp. 11–27, 2016.
  20. A. Clouvas and S. Xanthos, “A comparison study between radon concentration in schools and other workplaces,” Radiat Prot Dosimetry, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 207–210, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1093/RPD/NCR224.
  21. A. J. Khan, “A study of indoor radon levels in Indian dwellings, influencing factors and lung cancer risks,” Radiat Meas, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 87–92, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00275-9.
  22. A. N. Shaikh, T. V. Ramachandran, and A. Vinod Kumar, “Monitoring and modelling of indoor radon concentrations in a multi-storey building at Mumbai, India,” J Environ Radioact, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 15–26, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0265-931X(02)00144-3.
  23. K. Çıtlak, “Sakarya üniversitesi kampüs bölgesinde bina içi radon konsantrasyonunun belirlenmesi,” Yüksek lisans tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya, Türkiye, 2018.
  24. ICRP, Protection against radon-222 at home and at work, vol. 23, no. 2. ICRP Publication 65. Ann. ICRP, 1993.