Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 3

Adaptive Multi-Coefficient Quantization Index Modulation in DCT-Based Steganography

Mehtap Ülker(BİTLİS EREN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8680-8518
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experimental results show that the proposed approach maintains high visual quality (PSNR ≈ 46–59 dB) while providing more stable bit recovery compared to single-coefficient strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In digital image steganography, the primary aim is to embed information imperceptibly while ensuring reliable recovery under degradations encountered during storage, processing, or transmission.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the proposed method, each bit is distributed across multiple mid-frequency DCT coefficients within the same 8×8 block, thereby reducing sensitivity to coefficient-level distortions and improving decision stability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experimental results show that the proposed approach maintains high visual quality (PSNR ≈ 46–59 dB) while providing more stable bit recovery compared to single-coefficient strategies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adaptive Quantization Index · Modulation · DCT

Abstract

In digital image steganography, the primary aim is to embed information imperceptibly while ensuring reliable recovery under degradations encountered during storage, processing, or transmission. Conventional DCT-based approaches are inherently limited, as each bit is typically embedded into a single transform coefficient, making them highly sensitive to distortions such as Gaussian noise, JPEG compression, and resampling. To address this limitation, this study proposes an adaptive multi-coefficient QIM-based embedding framework. In the proposed method, each bit is distributed across multiple mid-frequency DCT coefficients within the same 8×8 block, thereby reducing sensitivity to coefficient-level distortions and improving decision stability. The embedding strength is adaptively controlled based on block variance, enabling a balance between robustness and perceptual quality. In addition, the embedded bitstream is processed using XOR-based pseudo-random encryption and Hamming error correction to mitigate random bit errors. This method is evaluated under Gaussian noise, JPEG compression, and resampling to reflect practical operating conditions. Experimental results show that the proposed approach maintains high visual quality (PSNR ≈ 46–59 dB) while providing more stable bit recovery compared to single-coefficient strategies. The results indicate that it achieves low error rates under JPEG compression and consistent performance under Gaussian noise, whereas resampling remains more challenging due to geometric distortions. The results show that combining adaptive embedding, multi-coefficient redundancy, and error correction improves performance consistency across distortions, although robustness varies with the degradation type.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ülker, M. (2026). Adaptive Multi-Coefficient Quantization Index Modulation in DCT-Based Steganography. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1839833

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. J. Fridrich, Steganography in Digital Media: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009.
  2. I. Cox, M. Miller, J. Bloom, J. Fridrich, and T. Kalker, Digital Watermarking and Steganography, 2nd ed., Burlington, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.
  3. S. D. Lin and C. F. Chen, “A robust DCT-based watermarking for copyright protection,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 415–421, 2000.
  4. F. Y. Shih, Digital Watermarking and Steganography: Fundamentals and Techniques, Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2017.
  5. Y. Zhang, X. Luo, Y. Guo, C. Qin, and F. Liu, “Multiple robustness enhancements for image adaptive steganography in lossy channels,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 2750–2764, 2019.
  6. J. Liu, X. Song, G. Li, and K. Han, “Robust JPEG image steganography using wavelet domain SVD and adaptive QIM,” International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP), IEEE, Jul. 2023, pp. 434–438.
  7. N. Hasan, S. Islam, and T. Begum, “Secure watermarking using adaptive QIM with local coefficient magnitudes in the frequency domain with PUF-based encryption,” International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), IEEE, Oct. 2025, pp. 1–6.
  8. N. Kazakova, R. Shevchuk, A. Sokolov, D. Yevdokymov, K. Marczak, and B. Smailova, “Adaptive code-controlled steganography with enhanced robustness to JPEG compression,” Symmetry, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 632, 2026.
  9. S. Solak, A. M. Abdirashid, A. Adjevi, and A. K. Sahu, “Robust data hiding method based on frequency coefficient variance in repetitive compression,” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 56, p. 101756, 2024.
  10. N. D. Tuan, “A secure image steganography based on Hamming codes and image block complexity estimation using a zig-zag order,” Journal of Science and Technology on Information Security, pp. 21–42, 2025.
  11. R. J. Mstafa and K. M. Elleithy, “A DCT-based robust video steganographic method using BCH error correcting codes,” in Proc. IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT), Farmingdale, NY, USA, Apr. 2016, pp. 1–6.
  12. N. Provos and P. Honeyman, “Hide and seek: An introduction to steganography,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 32–44, May–Jun. 2003.
  13. A. F. M. Abadin, R. Sulaiman, and M. K. Hasan, “Randomization strategies in image steganography techniques: A review,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 3139, 2024.
  14. R. W. Hamming, “Error detecting and error correcting codes,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 147–160, Apr. 1950.
  15. S. B. Dar and A. B. Dar, “Watermarking in frequency domain: A review,” International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 2014.
  16. D. Ariatmanto and F. Ernawan, “Adaptive scaling factors based on the impact of selected DCT coefficients for image watermarking,” Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 605–614, 2022.
  17. R. C. Gonzalez and R. Woods, Digital Image Processing. Pearson Education India, 2009.
  18. B. Chen and G. W. Wornell, “Quantization index modulation: A class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1423–1443, May 2001.
  19. M. Lei, X. Liu, M. Wang, Y. Yang, and Z. Qu, “Robust image watermarking based on quantization index modulation in the DCT domain,” Journal of Information Technology, 2018.
  20. M. Barni and F. Bartolini, Watermarking Systems Engineering: Enabling Digital Assets Security, Marcel Dekker, 2004.
  21. R. J. Mstafa and K. M. Elleithy, “An ECC/DCT-based robust video steganography algorithm for secure data communication,” Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 167–194, 2016.
  22. S. Sun, Y. Chen, X. Luo, and Q. Liu, “Image steganography based on Hamming code and edge detection,” International Arab Journal of Information Technology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 897–905, 2018.
  23. R. J. Mstafa and K. M. Elleithy, “A highly secure video steganography using Hamming code (7,4),” in Proc. IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT), 2014.
  24. G. Breed, “Bit error rate: Fundamental concepts and measurement issues,” High Frequency Electronics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46–47, 2003.
  25. U. Sara, M. Akter, and M. S. Uddin, “Image quality assessment through FSIM, SSIM, MSE and PSNR—A comparative study,” Journal of Computer and Communications, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 8–18, 2019.
  26. X. Li, B. Yang, and T. Zeng, “Efficient reversible watermarking based on adaptive prediction-error expansion and pixel selection,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 3524–3533, Dec. 2011.
  27. S. A. Barlaskar, A. M. Kirupakaran, R. H. Laskar, and T. Khan, “A robust digital image watermarking technique in LWT-DCT domain using particle swarm optimization and statistical distortion correction,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2025.