Journals / Journal of Education and Future / 2020 / Sayı: 18

Preschool Teachers’ Informal Learning Behaviors

Pages
17–27
Publication Date
2020-07-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An overall evaluation of environmental inhibitors to informal learning of preschool teachers shows that “lack of free time” affects the teachers most while “lack of monetary rewards” affects them least.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Informal learning is the primary feature that transforms educational activities into lifelong learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants include 117 preschool teachers working in Kütahya province of Turkey in the 2018-2019 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An overall evaluation of environmental inhibitors to informal learning of preschool teachers shows that “lack of free time” affects the teachers most while “lack of monetary rewards” affects them least.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Informal learning · preschool · teacher

Abstract

Informal learning is the primary feature that transforms educational activities into lifelong learning. Informal learning refers to people’s discovering new things and improving their experience in everyday life. That is, it refers to learning outside the classroom. Teachers' informal learning styles are thought of as ways in which they overcome their deficiencies while continuing their profession. This study aims to reveal preschool teachers’ informal learning behaviors in their workplaces. Thus, it is a descriptive survey study. The study group was selected through simple random sampling. The participants include 117 preschool teachers working in Kütahya province of Turkey in the 2018-2019 academic year. The study showed that the most frequently employed informal learning activity by preschool teachers is “search the internet” while the least employed one is “consult to an online community that you are a member of”. Focusing on informal learning activities of information technologies teachers in their workplaces. An overall evaluation of environmental inhibitors to informal learning of preschool teachers shows that “lack of free time” affects the teachers most while “lack of monetary rewards” affects them least. An overall evaluation of personal characteristics that enhance informal learning for preschool teachers shows that “love of learning” affects teachers’ involvement in informal learning activities most while “initiative” has the least effect on informal learning activities.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bartan, M. (2020). Preschool Teachers’ Informal Learning Behaviors. Journal of Education and Future, Sayı: 18, 17–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/137484

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alakurt, T. (2015). Workplace Informal Learning Behaviors of Information Technology Teachers. Elementary Education Online, 14(3), 934-945, 2015.
  2. Bedmar, V. L., & Palma, V. C. D. (2012). Lifelong Learning for the Teachers in the CEPs [Teachers’ Centers] of Andalusia, and their Reform. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3107-3111.
  3. Berg, S. A., & Chyung, S. (2008). Factors that influence informal learning in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(4), 229–244.
  4. Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1378.
  5. Bozdoğan, A. E. (2007). Students ınterests towards science fields about exhibitions in science centers: Feza Gursey Science Center in Turkey. Natural Science Education. 2 (19), 5-17. Commission of European Communities, (2000). A Memorandum on Lifelong Learning. [Online]http://tvu.acs.si/dokumenti/LLLmemorandum_Oct2000.pdf 2014
  6. Dağ, B. (2016). Exploring science teachers' informal learning (a case study Ankara – Keçi̇ören secondary schools. (Unpublished master thesis). Ankara University Institue of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  7. Efe, D. (2014). Situation of adults who have been working on e-learning field on the usage of mobile device applications with the aim of professional learning. (Unpublished master thesis). Gazi University Institue of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  8. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26, 247-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245
  9. Garrick, J. (2001). Informal learning in the workplace: Unmasking human resource development. London: Routledge. Gerber, B. L., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Development of an ınformal learning opportunities assay. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (6), 569-583.
  10. Göğebakan Yıldız, D. (2017). Lifelong learning. S. Z. Genç (Ed.), Changing values and the new education paradigm (pp.198-224).
  11. Pegem Academy, Ankara.
  12. Güleç, İ., Çelik, S., & Demirhan B. (2012). What Is Lifelong Learning? An Evaluation on Definition and Scope. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2/3.34-48.
  13. Güvercin, G. (2014). Informal Workplace Practices and Learning Experiences of Permanent and Hourly-Paid Teachers: A Comparative Study, (Unpublished doctor thesis). Boğaziçi University, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Sciences. İstanbul.
  14. Hanemann, U. (2015). Lifelong Literacy: Some Trends and Issues in Conceptuali