SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Development and Examination of Personal and Social Responsibility Behaviors Scale

Bireysel ve Sosyal Sorumluluk Davranışları Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi ve İncelenmesi

Bijen FİLİZ
Gıyasettin DEMİRHAN
Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2018-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was not detected a significance difference in total scores of athlete students’ responsibility behaviors in terms of gender and age variables while there were significant difference in their total scores of years of sport practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, “Personal and Social Responsibility Behaviors Scale (PSRB-S)” was developed in order to determine students’ responsibility behaviors in accordance with “Personal and Social Responsibility” model developed by Don Hellison and students’ personal and social responsibility levels were examined in terms of gender, age and years of sport practice through this scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pertaining to personal and social dimension of responsibility, four-category Likert type trial scale consisting of 52 items and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) were applied to 330 high-school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was not detected a significance difference in total scores of athlete students’ responsibility behaviors in terms of gender and age variables while there were significant difference in their total scores of years of sport practice.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bireysel ve sosyal sorumluluk modeli · bireysel sorumluluk · sosyal sorumluluk

Abstract

In this study, “Personal and Social Responsibility Behaviors Scale (PSRB-S)” was developed in order to determine students’ responsibility behaviors in accordance with “Personal and Social Responsibility” model developed by Don Hellison and students’ personal and social responsibility levels were examined in terms of gender, age and years of sport practice through this scale. Pertaining to personal and social dimension of responsibility, four-category Likert type trial scale consisting of 52 items and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) were applied to 330 high-school students. Items that did not apply as a result of the analysis were omitted from 52-item trial scale and the scale was reduced to 14 items. A final scale consisting of two factors was created. Obtained scale was applied to different 250 high-school students for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). It has been determined that EFA and CFA results of two-factor PSRB-S and reliability and validity of internal consistency coefficients are at an acceptable level. It was not detected a significance difference in total scores of athlete students’ responsibility behaviors in terms of gender and age variables while there were significant difference in their total scores of years of sport practice.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Don Hellison tarafından geliştirilen “Bireysel ve Sosyal Sorumluluk” modeline uygun olarak öğrencilerin sorumluluk davranışlarını belirlemek amacıyla “Bireysel ve Sosyal Sorumluluk Davranışları Ölçeği (BSSD-Ö)” geliştirilmiş ve bu ölçek aracılığıyla cinsiyet, yaş ve spor yapma yılı değişkenlerine göre bireysel ve sosyal sorumluluk düzeyleri incelenmiştir. Sorumluluğun bireysel ve sosyal boyutuna ilişkin 52 maddeden oluşan dört kategorili Likert tipli denemelik ölçek, Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) için 330 lise öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. Analiz sonucunda 52 maddeden oluşan denemelik ölçekten işlemeyen maddeler çıkartılarak 14 maddeye indirilmiş ve iki faktörden oluşan nihai ölçek oluşturulmuştur. Elde edilen ölçek doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) için farklı 250 lise öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. İki faktörlü olan BSSD-Ö’nün AFA ve DFA sonuçları ve iç tutarlılık katsayılarının güvenirlik ve geçerliliklerinin kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sporcu öğrencilerin sorumluluk davranışlarında; cinsiyet ve yaş değişkenlerine göre toplam puanlarında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamış, spor yapma yılı toplam puanlarında ise anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİLİZ, B., DEMİRHAN, G. (2018). Development and Examination of Personal and Social Responsibility Behaviors Scale. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/137363

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akyüz, H. (1991). Eğitim sosyolojisinin temel kavram ve alanları üzerine bir araştırma. İstanbul:
  2. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Alpar, R. (1998). İstatistik ve spor bilimleri. Ankara:
  3. Bağırgan. Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in studentsʼ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 21-37.
  4. Anderson, J. C, & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
  5. Barrio, D. V., Aluja, A., & Garcia, L. F. (2004). Relationship between empathy and the big five personality traits in a sample of Spanish adolescents. Society for Personality Research, 32(7), 677-682.
  6. Beedy, J. P., & Zierk, T. (2000). Lessons from the field: Taking a proactive approach to developing character through sports. CYD Journal: Community Youth Development, 3, 6–13.
  7. Berkowitz, L. D. (1963). Responsibility and dependency. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 429-436.
  8. Berkowitz, L., & Lutterman, K. (1968). The traditional socially responsible personality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32, 169-185.
  9. Bohner, G., & Wanke, M. (2002). Attitudes and Attitude Change. Hove: (UK) Psychology. Bressan, E. S. (1987). Physical education and social change in South Africa. In M. Carnes & P. Stueck. (Eds), Proceedings of the fifth curriculum theory conference in physical education (pp. 128-138).
  10. Athens, GA: University of Georgia. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.
  11. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1999). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 8 for windows. London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, Routledge. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: istatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. (12. bs.). Ankara:
  12. Pegem A. Chamberlin, L. J. (1994). Developing responsibility in today's students. Clearing House, 67(4), 204- 206. Chebat, J. (1986). Social responsibility, locus of control and social class. Journal of Social Psychology, 126(4), 559-562.
  13. Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psy¬chology, 55, 1019-1031.
  14. Coles, M. E., & Schofield, C. A. (2008). Assesing the development of inflated responsibility beliefs: The pathways to inflated responsibility beliefs scale. Behavior Therapy, 35, 322-335.
  15. Conrad, D., & Hed