Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Four-Skill Assessment of Turkish Language: Results from a Pilot Project

Pages
199–218
Publication Date
2020-06-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is suggested that FSTTL must be developed based on the experiences of the pilot project as a standardized test in accordance with the international standards and actively used to improve educational processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study analyses the results of the ‘Four-Skill Test in Turkish Language’ (FSTTL) project conducted by the Ministry of National Education to assess the language skills of students as a pilot project and investigates the effects of various variables on language skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample is consisted of 1932 students in seventh grade who participated in the pilot study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is suggested that FSTTL must be developed based on the experiences of the pilot project as a standardized test in accordance with the international standards and actively used to improve educational processes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Language Skills · Four-Skill Test in Turkish Language · Language Teaching

Abstract

This study analyses the results of the ‘Four-Skill Test in Turkish Language’ (FSTTL) project conducted by the Ministry of National Education to assess the language skills of students as a pilot project and investigates the effects of various variables on language skills. Relationships between language scores and school type, gender, preschool participation, parents’ level of education, and course grades are investigated in this descriptive study. The sample is consisted of 1932 students in seventh grade who participated in the pilot study. Test battery, consisted of reading, listening, writing, and speaking subtests, is used to assess the language skills of students within the scope of the FSTTL. Findings show that students in imam-hatip middle schools and middle schools performed at a similar level in all subtests. Female students performed significantly higher than male students in all subtests. Students participated in pre-school education performed significantly higher than those who did not participate in reading, writing, and listening subtests. Findings also show that the increase in parents’ level of education leads to an increase in students’ subtest scores. The effect of parents’ level of education on subtest scores is comparatively higher than the effects of other factors in focus. Significant correlations have been obtained between the four-skill scores and student’s Turkish course, social sciences, mathematics, and science course grades. It is suggested that FSTTL must be developed based on the experiences of the pilot project as a standardized test in accordance with the international standards and actively used to improve educational processes.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROĞLU, E., SUNA, E., TANBERKAN, H., CANIDEMİR, A., ALTUN, U., ÖZER, M. (2020). Four-Skill Assessment of Turkish Language: Results from a Pilot Project. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 199–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/137262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akbaşlı, S., Şahin, M., & Yaykıran, Z. (2016). The effect of reading comprehension on the performance in science and mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6), 108-121.
  2. Akoğlu, H. (2018). User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med,18(3), 91–93.
  3. Akram, A., & Malik, A. (2010). Integration of language learning skills in second language acquisition. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(14), 231 – 240. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. USA: Oxford University Press.
  4. Bakken, L., Brown, N., & Downing, B. (2015). Early childhood education: The long-term benefits. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31(2), 255-269.
  5. Barın, M. (2000). Yabancı dil öğretiminde konuşma becerisinin önemi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26, 123-127.
  6. Bayyurt, Y. (2013). Current perspectives on sociolinguistics and English language education. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1, 69-78.
  7. Boonkit, K. (2010). Enhancing the development of speaking skills for non-native speakers of English. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1305–1309.
  8. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nded.). New York: Pearson Education. Budria, S., Colino, A., & Martined de Ibarreta, C. (2019). The impact of host language proficiency on employment outcomes among immigrants in Spain. Empirica, 46, 625–652.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  10. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  11. Canale, M., & Merrill, S. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
  12. Catts, H. W., Fey, M.E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38–50.
  13. Chengyu, N. (2018). Implications of interrelationship among four language skills for high school English teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 418-423.
  14. Cook, V. J. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185-209.
  15. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure