Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: Special Issue-IODL

EDUCATION 4.0: DEFINING THE TEACHER, THE STUDENT, AND THE SCHOOL MANAGER ASPECTS OF THE REVOLUTION

Pages
12–28
Publication Date
2020-07-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the main qualities expected from the students of Education 4.0 are cooperation-communication skills, technological skills, learning skills and personal characteristics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, it is aimed to determine the school managers’, teachers’ and students’ characteristics of Education 4.0 according to opinions of educational experts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants of the study consisted of 10 faculty members, selected with snowball sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the main qualities expected from the students of Education 4.0 are cooperation-communication skills, technological skills, learning skills and personal characteristics.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Education 4.0 · teacher · student

Abstract

In this research, it is aimed to determine the school managers’, teachers’ and students’ characteristics of Education 4.0 according to opinions of educational experts. The study, which is a qualitative one, was designed by using basic qualitative research model. Participants of the study consisted of 10 faculty members, selected with snowball sampling method. Data of the study was collected via semi-structured interview form. To analyze data, content analysis technique will be used. It is expected to operationalize Education 4.0 revolution in education system for the case of Turkish Education System. According to findings, open access, individualized education, mental transformation, integration of digital technologies to education, seamless learning environments, lifelong learning, exploratory education and multidisciplinary education are the main components defining Education 4.0. It was found that the main qualities expected from the students of Education 4.0 are cooperation-communication skills, technological skills, learning skills and personal characteristics. The main qualifications expected from the teachers of Education 4.0 are technological skills, guidance skills, lifelong learning skills and personal characteristics. Lastly, the main qualifications expected from the school managers of Education 4.0 are guidance skills, technological skills, learning skills and technical skills.

🔖

Cite This Article

HIMMETOGLU, B., AYDUG, D., BAYRAK, C. (2020). EDUCATION 4.0: DEFINING THE TEACHER, THE STUDENT, AND THE SCHOOL MANAGER ASPECTS OF THE REVOLUTION. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: Special Issue-IODL, 12–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/137198

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abersek, B., & Flogie, A. (2017). Evolution of competences for new era or education 4.0. In XXV Conference of Czech Educational Research Association (CERA/CAPV)“Impact of Technologies in the Sphere of Education and Educational Research”, Czech. Anggraeni, C. W. (2018). Promoting Education 4.0 in English for survival class: What are the challenges?. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 2(1), 12-24.
  2. Ballantyne, N., Wong, Y. C. ve Morgan, G. (2017). Human services and the fourth industrial revolution: From husITa 1987 to husITa 2016. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 35(1), 1-7.
  3. Basar, H. (1993). Egitim denetcisi: Roller, yeterlikleri, secilmesi, yetistirilmesi (2. Baski). Ankara:
  4. PEGEM. Benesova, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 2195-2202.
  5. Blinder, A. P. (2006). Offshoring: The next industrial revolution?. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 113-128. 27 Bloem, J., Van Doorn, M., Duivestein, P., Excoffier, D., Maas, R. & Van Ommeren, E. (2014). The fourth industrial revolution. Things to tighten the link between IT and OT. SOGETI: VINT Research Report 3 of 4. Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, E.K., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, S., Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri (10. Baski). Ankara:
  6. Pegem Akademi. Ciolacu, M., Tehrani, A. F., Beer, R., & Popp, H. (2017). Education 4.0—Fostering student’s performance with machine learning methods. In 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME) (pp. 438-443).
  7. IEEE. Collins, A. & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18-27.
  8. Cagiltay, K., Yildirim, S., Aslan, I., Gok, A., Gurel, G., Karakus, T., Saltan, F., Uzun, E., Ulgen, E., & Yildiz, I. (2007). Ogretim teknolojilerinin universitede kullanimina yonelik aliskanliklar ve beklentiler: Betimleyici bir calisma. Akademik Bilisim’07 - IX. Akademik Bilisim Konferansi Bildirileri, Kutahya, Dumlupinar Universitesi. Drath, R. & Horch, A. (2014). Industrie 4.0: Hit or hype? [industry forum]. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 8(2), 56-58.
  9. Galetta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York, USA: New York University Press.
  10. Garrison, D. R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher edu