Journals / AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

The Foundations of Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Influence of Object Relations and Moral Disengagement

Komplo Teorilerine İnanmanın Temelleri: Nesne İlişkileri ve Ahlaki Uzaklaşma Etkisi

Ahmet Yasin Şenyurt(BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, PSİKOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-4779-9422
Gizem Adatepe(Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakülesi, Psikoloji Bölümü)0009-0000-3220-3409
Pages
85–111
Publication Date
2026-01-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study highlights the importance of early relational patterns and moral cognitive processes in understanding the psychological roots of conspiracy theories.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the relationships between object relations, moral disengagement, and belief in conspiracy theories, specifically testing the mediating role of moral disengagement in these relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 434 participants in Turkey via snowball sampling using the Bell Object Relations Inventory, the General Conspiracy Beliefs Scale, and the Moral Disengagement Scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study highlights the importance of early relational patterns and moral cognitive processes in understanding the psychological roots of conspiracy theories.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ahlaki uzaklaşma · komplo teorileri · nesne ilişkileri

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between object relations, moral disengagement, and belief in conspiracy theories, specifically testing the mediating role of moral disengagement in these relationships. Object relations theory suggests that early attachment experiences shape lifelong psychological processes and interpersonal perceptions. When these experiences are insecure, individuals may develop biased worldviews and altered moral frameworks. Moral disengagement involves cognitive mechanisms that legitimize unethical behavior, whereas conspiracy theories are skeptical beliefs that attribute events to hidden, malevolent groups. Data were collected from 434 participants in Turkey via snowball sampling using the Bell Object Relations Inventory, the General Conspiracy Beliefs Scale, and the Moral Disengagement Scale. Path analyses conducted in JAMOVI revealed significant positive correlations between maladaptive object relations, moral disengagement, and conspiracy beliefs. Specifically, moral disengagement was found to mediate the effect of egocentrism on all dimensions of conspiracy belief. Additionally, insecure attachment positively predicted beliefs in secret powers. These findings suggest that individuals with egocentric tendencies may rationalize conspiracy beliefs by externalizing moral responsibility through moral disengagement. Furthermore, insecure attachment patterns appear to foster a perception of the world as threatening and uncontrollable, reinforcing the tendency to endorse secret power narratives. This study highlights the importance of early relational patterns and moral cognitive processes in understanding the psychological roots of conspiracy theories.

Özet

Bu çalışma; nesne ilişkileri, ahlaki uzaklaşma ve komplo teorilerine olan inanç arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeyi ve ahlaki uzaklaşmanın bu süreçteki aracı rolünü test etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Nesne ilişkileri kuramı, erken dönem bağlanma deneyimlerinin bireyin dünyayı algılayışını ve ahlaki değerlerini şekillendirdiğini savunur. Ahlaki uzaklaşma, etik dışı davranışları meşrulaştıran bilişsel mekanizmaları; komplo teorileri ise olayların gizli ve kötü niyetli gruplarca yönetildiğine dair inançları ifade eder. Kartopu örnekleme yöntemiyle Türkiye genelinden ulaşılan 434 katılımcıdan; Bell Nesne İlişkileri Envanteri, Genel Komplo İnançları Ölçeği ve Ahlaki Uzaklaşma Ölçeği aracılığıyla veri toplanmıştır. JAMOVI yazılımı ile yapılan analizler; nesne ilişkilerinin alt boyutları, ahlaki uzaklaşma ve komplo inançları arasında anlamlı pozitif ilişkiler olduğunu göstermiştir. Bulgular, ahlaki uzaklaşmanın, benmerkezciliğin tüm komplo inancı boyutları üzerindeki etkisinde aracı rol oynadığını ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, güvensiz bağlanmanın gizli güçlere olan inancı pozitif yönde yordadığı saptanmıştır. Bu sonuçlar, benmerkezci eğilimleri olan bireylerin, ahlaki sorumluluğu dışsallaştırarak komplo inançlarını rasyonalize edebildiklerini göstermektedir. Ayrıca, güvensiz bağlanma örüntülerinin dünyayı tehdit edici ve kontrol edilemez bir yer olarak algılamaya katkıda bulunarak gizli güçlere olan inancı artırdığı değerlendirilebilir. Bu çalışma, komplo teorilerinin psikolojik kökenlerini anlamada erken dönem ilişkisel örüntülerin ve ahlaki bilişsel süreçlerin önemini vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şenyurt, A. Y., Adatepe, G. (2026). The Foundations of Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Influence of Object Relations and Moral Disengagement. AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 85–111. https://doi.org/10.31682/ayna.1662551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (77)

  1. Akçakaya, N. (2023). Türkiye’de komplo teorileri: Temalar, kökenler ve kaynaklar üzerine bütüncül bir soruşturma. Mülkiye Dergisi, 47(4), 1191–1224.
  2. Akkurt, S. B., ve Yalçındağ, B. (2023). Komplo teorilerine inanç ve Kovid-19 pandemisi. Kocatepe Beşerî Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 12–47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8091121
  3. Alper, S., Bayrak, F., ve Yılmaz, O. (2021). Psychological correlates of Covıd-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey. Current Psychology, 40(11), 5708–5717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00903-0
  4. Aquino, K., ve Reed, A. II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
  5. Baez, S., Flichtentrei, D., Prats, M., Mastandueno, R., García, A. M., Cetkovich, M., ve Ibáñez, A. (2017). Men, women…who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PlosOne, 12(6), Article e0179336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179336
  6. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., ve Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanism of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
  7. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
  8. Bell, M. D. (1995). Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory: BORRTI (1. Basım). Western Psychological Services.
  9. Bem, D. J., ve McConnell, H. K. (1972). Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,14(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020916
  10. Bertin, P., ve Delouvée, S. (2021). Affected more than infected: The relationship between national narcissism and zika conspiracy beliefs is mediated by exclusive victimhood about the zika outbreak. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909211051800
  11. Biddlestone, M., Green, R., ve Douglas, K., (2020). Cultural orientation, power, belief in conspiracy theories, and intentions to reduce the spread of COVID-19. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12397
  12. Blashill, A. J. (2011). Gender roles, eating pathology, and body dissatisfaction in men: A meta analysis. Body Image, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.09.002
  13. Bocian, K., Baryla, W., ve Wojciszke, B. (2020). Egocentrism shapes moral judgements. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(12), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12572
  14. Bora, E., ve Baysan, L. (2009). Empati Ölçeği-Türkçe formunun üniversite öğrencilerinde psikometrik özellikleri. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bulteni, 19(1), 39-47.
  15. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Volume I: Attachment (2. Basım). Basic Books.
  16. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development (1. Basım). Basic Books.
  17. Brewer, M. B., ve Chen, Y. R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133
  18. Brotherton, R., French, C. C., ve Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
  19. Buturoiu, R., Udrea, G., Oprea, D. A., ve Corbu, N. (2021). Who believes in conspiracy theories about the Covıd-19 pandemic in Romania? An analysis of conspiracy theories believers’ profiles. Societies, 11(4), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11040138
  20. Bjorklund, D. F., ve Green, B. L. (1992). The adaptive nature of cognitive immaturity. American Psychologist, 47(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.46
  21. Caprara, G. V., Tisak, M. S., Alessandri, G., Fontaine, R. G., Fida, R., ve Paciello, M. (2014). The contribution of moral disengagement in mediating individual tendencies toward aggression and violence. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034488
  22. Chopik, W. J., Moors, A. C., ve Edelstein, R. S. (2014). Maternal nurturance predicts decreases in attachment avoidance in emerging adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.004
  23. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., ve Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 93(2), 374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374
  24. Dixon, A. M. (2023). The role of early trauma in the formation of belief in reptilian conspiracy theories: A psychoanalytic perspective. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 39(4), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12856
  25. Doğan T. (2016). Ergenlerde ana-babaya bağlanma: Türkiye profili. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 8(4), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.253446
  26. Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., ve Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
  27. Douglas, K. M., ve Sutton, R. M. (2018). Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 256–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428
  28. Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., ve Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
  29. Düztepe, Ş. (2004). Araştırmalarda bilimsel yöntemin kullanılması ve araştırmanın temel aşamaları. Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi, 1(3), 49–53.
  30. Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., ve Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.x
  31. Erokhin, D., ve Komendantova, N. (2024). Earthquake conspiracy discussion on Twitter. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 454. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02957-y
  32. Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality (1. Basım) Routledge.
  33. Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207(4), 93–106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24936719
  34. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3. Basım). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  35. Gezici-Yalçın, M., Şenyurt, A. Y., Gültepe, B., ve Coşkun, H. (2016). Ahlâkî Uzaklaşma Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(10), 309–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.23863/kalem.2017.63
  36. Green, R., ve Douglas, K. M. (2018). Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.023
  37. Guntrip, H. (1969). Schizoid phenomena, object relations and the self (1. Basım). International Universities Press.
  38. Hasta, D., ve Güler, M. E. (2013). Saldırganlık: Kişilerarası ilişki tarzları ve empati açısından bir inceleme. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 64–104.
  39. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2. Basım). Sage Publications.
  40. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
  41. Hu, L. T., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  42. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. İçinde, J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall ve Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Edl.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Social behavior and applications (ss. 1–49). John Berry.
  43. Karagöz, Y., Karaşin, Y., ve Filiz, M. (2024). Depreme ilişkin komplo teorilerine yönelik tutumların belirlenmesi: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(3), 502-516. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsbd.1424897
  44. Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., ve McCoach, D. B. (2014). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
  45. Kernberg, O. F. (1976). Technical considerations in the treatment of borderline personality organization. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 24(4), 795–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306517602400403
  46. Killen, M., ve Dahl, A. (2021). Moral reasoning enables developmental and societal change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620964076
  47. Kim, S., ve Kim, S., (2021). Searching for general model of conspiracy theories and its implication for public health policy: Analysis of the impacts of political, psychological, structural factors on conspiracy beliefs about the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010266
  48. Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, 99–110.
  49. Knight, P. (2013). Conspiracy Culture: From Kennedy to the X Files (1. Basım). Routledge.
  50. Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders (1. Basım). International Universities Press.
  51. Kohut, H. (1977). Restoration of the self. International University Press.
  52. Kou, Y., Gui, X., Chen, Y., ve Pine, K. (2017). Conspiracy talk on social media: collective sensemaking during a public health crisis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134696
  53. Kuiper, N. A., ve Rogers, T. B. (1979). Encoding of personal information: Self–other differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(4), 499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.499
  54. Leidner, B., Castano, E., Zaiser, E., ve Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), 1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616721037639
  55. Maftei, A., ve Holman, A. C. (2020). Beliefs in conspiracy theories, intolerance of uncertainty, and moral disengagement during the coronavirus crisis. Ethics & Behavior, 32(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1843171
  56. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63
  57. Markus, H. R., ve Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  58. Mikulincer, M., ve Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (1. Basım). Guilford Press.
  59. Mikulincer, M., ve Shaver, P. R. (2011). Attachment, anger and aggression. İçinde, P. R. Shaver ve M. Mikulincer (Edl.), Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences (ss. 241–257). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12346-013
  60. Ogunfowora, B. T., Nguyen, V. Q., Steel, P., ve Hwang, C. C. (2022). A meta-analytic investigation of the antecedents, theoretical correlates, and consequences of moral disengagement at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(5), 746. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000912
  61. Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.656077
  62. Pace, U., ve Zappulla, C. (2011). Problem behaviors in adolescence: The opposite role played by insecure attachment and commitment strength. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9453-4
  63. Patten, D. (2003). How do we deceive ourselves? Philosophical Psychology, 16(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080307767
  64. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literatüre and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  65. Runions, K. C., Shaw, T., Bussey, K., Thornberg, R., Salmivalli, C., ve Cross, D. S. (2019). Moral disengagement of pure bullies and bully/victims: Shared and distinct mechanisms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 1835–1848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01067-2
  66. Santoro, G., Costanzo, A., Schimmenti, A., ve Midolo, L. R. (2021). The vulnerability of insecure minds: The mediating role of mentalization in the relationship between attachment styles and psychopathology. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 85(4), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.2021.85.4.358
  67. Schieman, S., ve Van-Gundy, K. (2000). The personal and social links between age and self-reported empathy. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(2), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695889
  68. Sunstein, C. R., ve Vermeule, A. (2008). Conspiracy theories (University of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 387). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1084585
  69. Swami, V., Furnham, A., Smyth, N., Weis, L., Lay, A., ve Clow, A. (2016). Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.084
  70. Şenyurt, A. Y. (2024). Dijitalleşen dünyada komplo inançları: Pandemiye ilişkin komplo inançlarının twitter içerik analizi ile incelenmesi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(4), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1477071
  71. Şenyurt, A. Y. (2025). Religious beliefs as a mediator between conspiracy beliefs and health behaviors. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1585793
  72. Tam, M. S. (2023). Genel Komplo Teorilerine İnanma Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. İnönü Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 8(2), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.47107/inifedergi.1330907
  73. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.
  74. Turan, S. (2021). Geç ergenlik dönemi: Ahlaki uzaklaşma. Sportive, 4(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.53025/sportive.877254
  75. Uluç, S., Tüzün, Z., Haselden, M. ve Erbaş, S. P. (2015). Bell Nesne İlişkileri ve Gerçeği Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin (BORTTI) Türkçe'ye uyarlama çalışması. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, 18(4), 112–123.
  76. van Prooijen, J. W., ve Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
  77. Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41(6), 585–595.