SavedAdd your journal

Journals / AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34

Social Network Analysis: Literature Review

Sosyal Ağ Analizi: Literatür İncelemesi

Nursen AYDIN
Pages
73–80
Publication Date
2018-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Evaluating strategically important networks within an organization, make "invisible" groups visible in the interaction and allows them to work with key groups to facilitate effective collaboration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, social network analysis SNA is defined and historical development process is explained.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A comprehensive literature search has been conducted for this purpose.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Evaluating strategically important networks within an organization, make "invisible" groups visible in the interaction and allows them to work with key groups to facilitate effective collaboration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social Network Analysis · Health · Research Methods.

Abstract

In this article, social network analysis SNA is defined and historical development process is explained. A comprehensive literature search has been conducted for this purpose. SAA is a powerful method that centralizes individuals and their relations, in that the effect of the individual on the social network can be uncovered and the network of individual groups can be evaluated holistically. SNA shows the structural gaps and social capital in institutions, and focuses managers' attention on critical informal networks. Evaluating strategically important networks within an organization, make "invisible" groups visible in the interaction and allows them to work with key groups to facilitate effective collaboration.

Özet

Bu makalede sosyal ağ analizi tanımı yapılarak sosyal ağ analizinin SNA tarihsel gelişim süreci açıklanması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla kapsamlı literatür taraması yapılmıştır. SAA, bireylerin sosyal ağdaki etkisinin ortaya çıkarılması ve birey gruplarının oluşturduğu ağın bütünsel olarak değerlendirilebilmesinde, kişileri ve ilişkilerini merkeze alan güçlü bir yöntemdir. Sosyal ağ analizi kurumlardaki yapısal boşluklar ve sosyal sermayeyi göstermekte, yöneticilerin dikkatini kritik informal ağlara odaklamaktadır. Bir organizasyon içindeki stratejik olarak önemli ağları değerlendirmek, etkileşim halindeki "görünmez" grupları görünür hale getirmek ve etkili işbirliğini kolaylaştırmak için önemli gruplarla çalışma imkânı sağlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, N. (2018). Social Network Analysis: Literature Review. AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34, 73–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/137084

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Amabile, T., Fisher, C. M., & Pillemer, J. (2014). IDEO’s culture of helping. Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. January-February, 1-9.
  2. Aydin, N, & Bekâroglu, Ş. B. (2017). A social network analysis on the culture of helping in health institutions. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 11 (2), 033-050.
  3. Barabasi, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509-512.
  4. Behrendt, S., Richter, A., & Trier, M. (2014). Mixed methods analysis of enterprise social networks. Computer Networks, 75, 560–577.
  5. Billig, M. (2015). Kurt Lewin's leadership studies and his legacy to social psychology, is there nothing as practical as a good theory? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45 (4), 440-460.
  6. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Transaction Books. Carrington, P. J. (2014). Early research in social networks. In: S. Dominguez, & B. Hollstein (eds.), Mixed Methods Social Networks Research, Design and Applications (pp. 38- 39). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2002).
  8. Making invisible work visible, Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44 (2), 25-46.
  9. Daly, E., & Haahr, M. (2007). Social network analysis for routing in disconnected delaytolerant MANETs. MobiHoc, 9 (1), 32-40.
  10. Davis, A., Gardner, B. B., & Gardner, M. R. (2009). Deep South. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  11. Demir, H., & Taktak, F. (2011). Social network analysis on spatial data (SNA), Afyonkarahisar example. Electronic Journal of Map Technologies, 3 (1), 7-16.
  12. Ehrlich, K., & Carboni, I. (2005). Inside social network analysis. Boston College, 1-13.
  13. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2 (1), 335-362.
  14. Emma, C. (2013). Sociological theory in the contemporary era: Exchange and rational choice theories: Peter M. Blau (1918–2002): A biographical sketch. 136-153.
  15. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Harper and Bros. Freeman, L. C. (1996). Some antecedents of social network analysis. Connections. 19 (1), 39-42.
  16. Freeman, L. C. (2011). The development of social network analysis, With an emphasis on recent events. http,//moreno.ss.uci.edu/91.pdf Gulpinar, V. (2013). Customer loss analysis in Turkish telecommunication market with artificial neural networks and social network analysi