Journals / AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 36

Classification of Conflicts Encountered in the Public Construction Projects

Kamu İnşaat Projelerinde Karşılaşılan İhtilafların Sınıflandırılması

Pages
95–107
Publication Date
2019-02-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also planned to develop a conflict resolution model based on artificial intelligence and be practically applicable in the real cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Conflicts in public construction projects usually comprise many complex and interrelated factors and mostly may lead to conflicts between contracting parties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Generally, resolution process through a court system is a costly, time-consuming activity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also planned to develop a conflict resolution model based on artificial intelligence and be practically applicable in the real cases.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Public Construction Projects · Conflict Classification · Flow Charts

Abstract

Conflicts in public construction projects usually comprise many complex and interrelated factors and mostly may lead to conflicts between contracting parties. Generally, resolution process through a court system is a costly, time-consuming activity. This issue could delay the completion of a construction project thereby, planned public services might be postponed, expected Project quality cannot be reached and project cost might be overpriced. The aim of this study is to bring this complex composition into view through conflict classification and establish a cause and effect relation according to both sides’ opinions. Thus, in case of similar situations, conflicting sides can find out their right and wrong thoughts. It is also planned to develop a conflict resolution model based on artificial intelligence and be practically applicable in the real cases.

Özet

Kamu inşaat projelerinde karşılaşılan ihtilaflar genellikle çok sayıda karmaşık ve birbirleriyle ilişkili faktörleri içermekte ve çoğu zaman bu durum taraflar arasında anlaşmazlıkların çıkmasını neden olabilmektedir. Genellikle yargı sistemindeki çözüm süreci maliyetli olmakta ve çok uzun zaman almaktadır. Bu durum inşaat projesinin tamamlanma süresinin dolayısıyla da planlanan kamu hizmetlerin gecikmesine, projeden beklenen kalitenin elde edilmemesine ve projenin maliyetinin artmasına neden olur. Çalışmamızın amacı, ihtilafları sınıflandırarak karmaşık yapıyı kolay görülebilir yapmak ve her iki tarafın görüşü doğrultusunda sebep ve sonuç ilişkisini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Böylece benzer durumlarda, ihtilafın tarafları haklı ve haksız oldukları yanlarını görebileceklerdir. Çalışmamızda ayrıca yapay zekâ temelinde bir ihtilaf çözüm modeli geliştirilerek gerçek durumlarda pratik olarak uygulanabilmesini sağlamak amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZ, B., MANİSALI, E. (2019). Classification of Conflicts Encountered in the Public Construction Projects. AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 36, 95–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/137079

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Arditi, D., Oksay, F.E. and Behzat T., O. 1998. Predicting the Outcome of Construction Litigation Using Neural Networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Cilt. 13, s. 75-81.
  2. Arditi, D. and Behzat T., O. 1999. Using Case-Based Reasoning to Predict the Outcome of Construction Litigation. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Cilt 14, s. 385-393.
  3. Chau, K.W. 2007. Application of a PSO-Based Neural Network in Analysis of Outcomes of Construction Claims. Automation in Construction, Cilt 16, s. 642-646.
  4. Adrian, J.J. 1993. Construction Claims: A Quantitative Approach. 2nd, new edition. Stipes Publishing L.L.C., Champaing, IL, ABD, 320s. Jergeas, G.F., and Hartman, F.T. 1994. Contractor’s Construction Claims Avoidance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Cilt 120 (3), s. 553-560.
  5. Kumaraswamy, M.M. and Yogeswaran, K. 1998. Significant Sources of Construction Claims. International Construction Law Review, Cilt 15 (1), s. 144-160.
  6. Kassab, M., Hipel, K. and Hegazy, T. 2006. Conflict Resolution in Construction Disputes Using the Graph Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Cilt 10, s. 1043-1052.
  7. Pulket, T. and Arditi, D. 2009. Construction Litigation Prediction System Using Ant Colony Optimization. Construction Management and Economics, Cilt 27, s.241-251.
  8. Oz, B., Anbarcı, M. ve Manisali E. 2017. A Conflict Resolution Model Identifying Cause and Effect Relations by Using Fuzzy Expert System. Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation, Cilt: 4(4), s. 67-83.
  9. Cheung, S., Suen, H. C. H. and Lam, T. 2002. Fundamentals of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Cilt 128 (5), s. 409-417.
  10. Cheng, M.Y., Tsai, H.C. and Chiu, Y.H. 2009. Fuzzy Case-Based Reasoning for Coping with Construction Disputes. Expert Systems with Applications, Cilt 36, s. 4106-4113.
  11. Gök, Y. 2013. Yapım Sözleşmeleri Uygulama Esasları. 2nd baskı. İlksan Matbaası, Ankara, 1028s. TBK, 2011.
  12. T.C. Resmi Gazete, Sayı 27836, Ankara.
  13. Duman, İ.H. 2010. Açıklamalı-İçtihatlı İnşaat Hukuku. 3nd baskı. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 1448s. YİGŞ, 2011. T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı: Yüksek Fen Kurulu Başkanlığı, Ankara. KİSK, 2002.
  14. T.C. Resmi Gazete, Sayı 24648, Ankara.
  15. Gök, Y. 2007. Yapım Sözleşmeleri Uygulama Esasları. İlksan Matbaası, Ankara, 927s. Sayın, İ.H. 2000. Kamu Personelinin Mali Sorumluluğu. http:www.ekitapyayin.com/id/043/ (Erişim Tarihi: 01 Haziran 2011).