Journals / Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

NATO’S BARRIERS: THE TRANSFORMATION IN FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND FACTORS THAT DECREASE ALLIANCE’S EFFICIENCY

NATO’NUN BARİYERLERİ: TERÖRİZMLE MÜCADELEDE YAŞANAN DÖNÜŞÜM VE İTTİFAKIN ETKİNLİĞİNİ AZALTAN FAKTÖRLER

Pages
75–108
Publication Date
2016-05-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The nature of terrorism, political and military differences between the USA and European allies, inadequacy of intelligence, the unwieldiness of NATO’s decision-making system, the problems of enlargement process and the legality and cogency problems of the operations, have been examined as serious problems in this study

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The matter of fight against terrorism that is the biggest threat to international community and global system, became primary agenda topic of NATO like other international organizations especially after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context NATO underwent a process of political and military two-way transformation for conducting the struggle in a more efficient way.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The nature of terrorism, political and military differences between the USA and European allies, inadequacy of intelligence, the unwieldiness of NATO’s decision-making system, the problems of enlargement process and the legality and cogency problems of the operations, have been examined as serious problems in this study
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:NATO · Dönüşüm · Terörizmle MücadelE

Abstract

The matter of fight against terrorism that is the biggest threat to international community and global system, became primary agenda topic of NATO like other international organizations especially after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In this context NATO underwent a process of political and military two-way transformation for conducting the struggle in a more efficient way. In this way it has reached from a stable military structure to mobile and dynamic one and has formed political framework supporting this military organization. Despite the positive development process in combating terrorism, NATO encounters with some problems in practice. The nature of terrorism, political and military differences between the USA and European allies, inadequacy of intelligence, the unwieldiness of NATO’s decision-making system, the problems of enlargement process and the legality and cogency problems of the operations, have been examined as serious problems in this study

Özet

Uluslararası toplum ve küresel sisteme yönelik en büyük tehdit olarak algılanan terörizmle mücadele hususu, özellikle ABD’ye yönelik gerçekleştirilen 11 Eylül terörist saldırıları neticesinde, diğer uluslararası organizasyonlar gibi NATO’nun da birinci gündem maddesi haline gelmiştir. Bu kapsamda İttifak, mücadeleyi daha etkin yürütebilmek adına askeri ve politik olarak iki yönlü bir dönüşüm sürecine girmiştir. Böylelikle durağan askeri kuvvet yapısından dinamik ve mobil bir yapıya kavuşmuş ve bu askeri teşkilatlanmayı destekleyecek politik bir yapı oluşturmuştur. Gerçekleşen bu olumlu sürece rağmen, NATO’nun terörizmle mücadelesinde etkinliğini azaltan birtakım problemler bulunmaktadır. Terörizmin doğası, ABD ve Avrupalı müttefikler arasındaki politik ve askeri farklılıklar, istihbarat yetersizliği, karar alma sistemindeki hantallık, genişleme sürecinin yarattığı sıkıntılar ve yapılan operasyonların meşruluk ve inandırıcılık sorunları, bu kapsamda çalışmada önemli problemler olarak irdelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARAÇOĞLU, M. Y. (2016). NATO’S BARRIERS: THE TRANSFORMATION IN FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND FACTORS THAT DECREASE ALLIANCE’S EFFICIENCY. Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 75–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/13691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Aktürk, Ş.(2012). NATO Neden Genişledi? Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları Işığında NATO’nun Genişlemesi ve ABD-Rusya İç Siyaseti, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 9, Sayı 34, 73-97.
  2. Aldrich, R.(2004). Transatlantic Intelligence and Security Cooperation, International Affairs, Volume: 80, No: 3, 733-755.
  3. Alexander, Y.(2008). Contemporary Terrorism: From National to Regional and Global Threats, Defence Against Terrorism Review, Vol: 1, No: 2, 41-46.
  4. Appathurai, J.(2002),
  5. Closing the Capabilities Gap, NATO Review. http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2002/Capabilities/Closing-capabilities-gap/EN/index.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.2015).
  6. Arıboğan, D.Ü.(2006). Terörizme Karşı Kurumlar Arası Koordinasyon ve İşbirliği İmkânları, Küresel Terörizm ve Uluslararası İşbirliği Sempozyumu, Genelkurmay Başkanlığı Terörizmle Mücadele Mükemmeliyet Merkezi Yayını. Axelrod, R. ve Borzutzky,S.(2006). NATO and the War on Terror: The Organizational Challenges of the Post 9/11 World, Springer, 293-307.
  7. Ball, C.(1998). Nattering NATO Negativism? Reasons Why Expansion May Be a Good Thing, Review of International Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1, 43-67.
  8. Benecke, U.(2007). Reconsidering NATO’s Decision Making Process, US Army War College Strategy Research Project, 1-20.
  9. Bennett, C.(2003).
  10. Combating Terrorism, NATO Review, http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2003/issue1/english/art2.html,(Erişim Tarihi: 04.03.2015).
  11. Bensahel, N.(2006). A Coalition of Coalitions: International Coperation Against Terrorism, Studies in Conflict&Terrorism, RAND, 35-49.
  12. Bernasconi, C.(2011). NATO’ s Fight Against Terrorism Where Do We Stand?, NATO Defense College Research Paper,1-8.
  13. Braun, D.(2007), NATO Enlargement and the Politics of Identity, Queen’s University Centre for International Relations,1-91.
  14. Brown, C. Self-Defense in an Imperfect World, Ethics&International Affairs, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Mart 2003, 2-8.
  15. Caşın, M.H.(2008)
  16. Uluslararası Terörizm, İstanbul Nobel Yayıncılık. Chaudhuri, R. ve Farrell,T. (2011). Campaign Disconnect: Operational Progress and Strategic Obstacles in Afghanistan 2009–2011,
  17. International Affairs, Volume: 87, Issue: 2, 271-296.
  18. Clarke, R. ve Mccaffrey,B.(2004). NATO’s Role in Confronting International Terorism, Atlantic Council Policy Paper,1-47.
  19. Croft, S. (2002). Guaranteeing Europe’s Security? Enlarging NATO Again, International Affairs, Vol: 78, No: 1, 97-114.
  20. Cuccia, P.R.(2010).
  21. Implications of a Changing NATO, US Army War College Strategic Studies Institute,1-51.
  22. Denevers, R.(2007). NATO’s I