Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE

Pages
68–79
Publication Date
2017-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They can be used as a guideline of how mobile phone can be fully incorporated into the instructional process in order to enhance learner engagement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mobile phone technology that has a huge impact on students’ lives in the digital age may offer a new type of learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The current research compared how male and female students perceived mobile phones as a language learning tool, used mobile phones to learn English and developed their learning performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They can be used as a guideline of how mobile phone can be fully incorporated into the instructional process in order to enhance learner engagement.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:M-learning · mobile phone use · classroom teaching

Abstract

Mobile phone technology that has a huge impact on students’ lives in the digital age may offer a new type of learning. The use of effective tool to support learning can be affected by the factor of gender. The current research compared how male and female students perceived mobile phones as a language learning tool, used mobile phones to learn English and developed their learning performance. A five-point rating scale questionnaire was used to collect data from 122 students, comprising 65 females and 57 males. They were enrolled in a fundamental English course where mobile phone usage was integrated in certain language learning tasks with an aim to facilitate learning. The findings demonstrated that male and female students did not differ in their usage, attitudes toward mobile phone uses for language learning as well as their learning performance at a significance level. In addition, the constraints of using mobile phone for learning that students identified in an open-ended question included the small screen and keyboard the most, followed by intrusiveness of SMS background knowledge, and limited memory of mobile phone. The implication for classroom practice was proposed in how mobile phone can be fully incorporated into the instructional process in order to enhance learner engagement. The results of this study are important for teachers when implementing the mobile phone technology in language teaching. They can be used as a guideline of how mobile phone can be fully incorporated into the instructional process in order to enhance learner engagement.

🔖

Cite This Article

HILAO, M. P., WICHADEE, S. (2017). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 68–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/136850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 111-119.
  2. Beranuy, M., Oberst, U. Carbonell, X., & Chamarro, A. (2009). Problematic Internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: the role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1182–1187.
  3. Bianchi A., Phillips J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyber Psychology Behavior, 8(1):39–51.
  4. Billieux, J., Van Der Linden, M., & Rochat, L. (2008). The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(9), 1195– 1210. Brown, L. (2008). Using Mobile Learning to Teach Reading to Ninth-Grade Students. Ph.D dissertation Capella University, USA. Available Online at http://gradworks.umi.com/ 3330949.pdf Cavus, N. (2011). Investigating mobile devices and LMS integration in higher education: student perspectives. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1469-1474.
  5. Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Going to the MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9–16.
  6. Cuing, G., & Wang, S. (2008). Adoption cell phones in EFL Teaching and Learning. Retrieved October 31, 2012 from www.notworthprinting.wordpress.com/ category/mobile-learning. Craig, T., & Van Lorn, M. (2009). Impact Constructivist Learning Theory and MobileTechnology Integration. [Academic]. Theories of Educational Technology, 12, 1-12.
  7. Cobcroft, R. S., Towers, S. J., Smith, J. E., & Bruns, A. (2006). Mobile learning in review: Opportunities and challenges for learners, teachers and institutions. In Proceedings Online Learning and Teaching (OLT) Conference 2006, (pp.21-30). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology. Donaldson, R.L. (2011). Student acceptance of mobile learning. Dissertation. The Florida State University College of Communication & Information. Retrieved April 26, 2012 from http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-05312011074842/ unrestricted/Donaldson_ R_dissertation_2011.pdf. Grellhesl, M., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2012). Using the uses and gratifications theory to understand gratifications sought through text messaging practices of male and female undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2175–2181.
  8. Hong, F. Y., Chiu, S. I., & Lin, H. Y. (2012). The development and current states of private college student mobile phone addiction