Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts

References (13)

1. Verma AK, Kumar S, Bhattacharya S. Identification of a person with the help of bitemark analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013;3:88-91
2. Hinchliffe J. Forensic odontology, part 4. human bite marks. Br Dent J. 2011;210:363-8
3. Clement JG, Blackwell SA. Is current bite mark analysis a misnomer? Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201:33-7
4. Lewis C, Marroquin LA. Effects of skin elasticity on bite mark distortion. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;257;293- 6
5. Verma AK, Kumar S, Bhattacharya S. Identification of a person with the help of bite mark analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013;3:88-91
6. Daniel MJ, Pazhani A. Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: a comparative study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7:222-6
7. Avon SL, Victor C, Mayhall JT, Wood RE. Error rates in bite mark analysis in an in vivo animal model. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201:45-55
8. Bush MA. Forensic dentistry and bitemark analysis: sound science or junk science? J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:997-9
9. Balko R. How the flawed ‘science’ of bite mark analysis has sent innocent people to prison. The Washington Post. 13th February 2015
10. Stroud M. Biting controversy: forensic dentistry battles to prove it's not 'junk science' Should the practice that landed serial killer Ted Bundy on death row be banned?. The Verge. 25th September 2013
11. Reesu GV, Brown NL. Inconsistency in opinions of forensic odontologists when considering bite mark evidence. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:263-70
12. Page M, Taylor J, Blenkin M. Reality bites--a ten-year retrospective analysis of bitemark casework in Australia. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;216:82-7
13. Bowers CM1, Pretty IA. Expert disagreement in bitemark casework. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:915-8.