Journals / Ankara Bar Review / 2026 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Assessment of Proportional Litigation and Retainer Charges in Full Remedy Actions

Ali Volkan Özgüven(Attorney at Law, Member of Adana Bar)
Pages
101–107
Publication Date
2008-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Atype of administrative cases, Full Remedy actions are instituted on the grounds of the principle of administrative responsibility by those whose rights have been violated on account of the actions, operations or contracts issued by the administration, with the purpose to restore the violated rights and paying restitution for the resultant loss. 1 Under the Law of Administrative Procedure No. 2577, Full Remedy actions are defined as actions instituted by those whose personal rights have been prejudiced due to administrative actions or operations.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özgüven, A. V. (2008). Assessment of Proportional Litigation and Retainer Charges in Full Remedy Actions. Ankara Bar Review, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 101–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/1362915

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...