SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: STEMES’18 Özel Sayı

Exhibiting a Workshop for Science Teachers on Cooperative Learning Model and Its Outcome

Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerine İşbirlikli Öğrenme Modeli Çalıştayı Yapılması ve Çalıştayın Değerlendirilmesi

Adem Akkuş(MUŞ ALPARSLAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9570-3582
Kemal Doymuş(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0578-5623
Pages
81–85
Publication Date
2018-12-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For that reason it is concluded that practical training is helpful to science teachers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of this study is to determine the effect of workshop on cooperative learning model exhibited to science teachers who participated in the workshop.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the aim of study a 36 hour workshop on cooperative learning model and its application exhibited to science teachers who are currently in-service training.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For that reason it is concluded that practical training is helpful to science teachers.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İşbirlikli Öğretmenler · Fen Bilimleri · Hizmet İçi Eğitim

Abstract

Aim of this study is to determine the effect of workshop on cooperative learning model exhibited to science teachers who participated in the workshop. For the aim of study a 36 hour workshop on cooperative learning model and its application exhibited to science teachers who are currently in-service training. After workshop different scales are applied to 51 science teachers. Purpose of the scales is to reveal the effectiveness of the workshop. Study results revealed that workshop is helpful to science teachers whose skills increased on the cooperative learning model by workshop. For that reason it is concluded that practical training is helpful to science teachers.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı hizmet içi eğitim alan fen bilimleri öğretmenlerine işbirlikli modeli üzerine bilgi verilip uygulama yapılması ve uygulamanın değerlendirilmesidir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda hizmet içi eğitim alan 51 fen bilimleri öğretmenine yönelik işbirlikli öğrenme modeli ve modelin uygulanması üzerine 36 saatlik çalıştay düzenlenmiştir. Çalıştay sonunda öğretmenlere çeşitli ölçekler uygulanmıştır. Uygulanan ölçeklerin amacı çalıştayın etkililiğini açığa çıkarmaktır. Araştırma sonucunda çalıştayın fen bilimleri öğretmenlerine faydalı olduğu ve öğretmenlerin işbirlikli modeli uygulama becerilerinin arttığı anlaşılmıştır. Bu nedenle öğretmenlere yöntemleri uygulamalı olarak yaptırmalarının faydalı olacağı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akkuş, A., Doymuş, K. (2018). Exhibiting a Workshop for Science Teachers on Cooperative Learning Model and Its Outcome. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: STEMES’18 Özel Sayı, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.468480

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Abdullah, S., & Shariff, A. (2008). The effects of inquiry-based computer simulation with cooperative learning on scientific thinking and conceptual understanding of gas laws. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4 (4), 387-398.
  2. Acat, M.B., Anılan, H., & Anagun, S.S. (2010). The problems encountered in designing constructivist learning environments in science education and practical suggestions. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9 (2), 212-220.
  3. Artut, P.D., & Tarim, K. (2007). The Effectiveness of Jigsaw II on prospective elementary school teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (2), 129-141.
  4. Bayrakçeken, S., Doymuş, K., Doğan, A., Akar, S., & Dikel, S. (2012). Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin İşbirlikli Öğrenme Modeli Uygulama Düzeyleri. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14 (1), 127-144.
  5. Bear, G.G., Gaskins, C., Blank, J., & Chen, F.F. (2011). Delaware School Climate Survey-Student: Its factor structure, concurrent validity, and reliability. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 157-174.
  6. Byrd, D. (2012). Social Studies Education as a Moral Activity: Teaching towards a just society. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44 (10), 1073-1079.
  7. Cho, H., Glewwe, P., & Whitler, M. (2012). Do reductions in class size raise students’ test scores? Evidence from population variation in Minnesota’s elementary schools. Economics of Education Review, 31, 77-95.
  8. Demirtaş, Z. (2010). Okul Kültürü ile Öğrenci Başarısı Arasındaki İlişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35 (158), 3-13.
  9. Dikel, S. (2012). Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin İşbirlikli Öğrenme Modeli Hakkında Bilgilendirilmesi, Bu Yöntemi Sınıfta Uygulamaları ve Elde Edilen Sonuçların Değerlendirilmesi: Erzurum İl Örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi.
  10. Doymuş, K. (2007). Effects of a cooperative learning strategy on teaching and learning phases of matter and one-component phase diagrams. Chemical Education Research, 84 (11), 1857-1860.
  11. Doymuş, K., & Koç, Y. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin işbirlikli öğrenme modelini sınıftaki uygulaması. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 174-183.
  12. Feldman, A., & Pirog, K. (2011). Authentic science research in elementary school after-school science clubs. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 494-507.
  13. Ferguson, R. (2011). Meaningful learning and creativity in virtual worlds. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6, 169-178.
  14. Garderen, D.V., Hanuscin, D., & Lee, E. (2012). Quest: a collaborative professional development model to meet the needs of diverse learners in k-5 science. Psychology in the Schools, 49 (5), 429-443.
  15. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım
  16. Kuusisaari, H. (2013). Teachers’ collaborative learning – development of teaching in group discussions. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19 (1), 50 - 62.
  17. McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in Education: Evidence Based Inquiry. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
  18. Thanh, P.T.H. (2011). An investigation of perceptions of Vietnamese teachers and students toward cooperative learning (CL). International Education Studies, 4 (1), 3-12.
  19. Uzun, N. (2012). A sample of active learning application in science education: the thema “cell” with educational games. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2932-2936.
  20. Wang, C-H., Ke, Y-T., Wu, J-T., & Hsu, W-H. (2012). Collaborative Action Research on Technology Integration for Science Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21 (1), 125-132.
  21. Yörük, A., Boyraz, A., Akkuş, H., & Akkuş, A. (2012). Effect of Families on Students’ Achievement and Success on Science Courses. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 5(1), 119-125.
  22. McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in Education: Evidence Based Inquiry. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.