SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 6

Selection of Logistics Center Location Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ile Lojistik Merkezi Yeri Seçimi

Hamit Erdal(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0001-8352-6427
Hacer Yumurtacı Aydoğmuş0000-0002-2307-0840
Pages
129–136
Publication Date
2019-12-13
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most suitable location among alternatives was recommended by using pairwise comparison with expert opinions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Location problems with a complex structure have been studied for many years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it is aimed to determine the most suitable LC location that will be managed by Istanbul Textile and Apparel Exporters' Association (ITKIB) and will serve the textile sector by using AHP method in order to manage export processes more successfully and to increase the export potential.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most suitable location among alternatives was recommended by using pairwise comparison with expert opinions.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci · Lojistik Merkezi · Yer Seçimi

Abstract

Location problems with a complex structure have been studied for many years. Choosing right location for public or private organizations has great importance. The most suitable location for warehouses, airports, factories, logistic centers (LC) etc. are tried to be determined by location problems. Traditional and heuristic methods have been developed to solve location problems. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is used in Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Problems, is one of the commonly used methods. In this study, it is aimed to determine the most suitable LC location that will be managed by Istanbul Textile and Apparel Exporters' Association (ITKIB) and will serve the textile sector by using AHP method in order to manage export processes more successfully and to increase the export potential. The most suitable location among alternatives was recommended by using pairwise comparison with expert opinions.

Özet

Karmaşık bir yapıya sahip olan yer seçimi problemleri uzun yıllardır üzerinde çalışılan bir konu olmuştur. Kamu veya özel kuruluşlar açısından uygun yerin seçimi büyük önem taşımaktadır. Yer seçimi problemleriyle depo, havaalanı, üretim merkezi, lojistik merkezi gibi çeşitli yerlerin konumları en uygun şekilde belirlenmeye çalışılmaktadır. Bu tip problemlerin çözümü için geleneksel ve sezgisel yöntemler geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen yöntemler içinde, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Problemleri’nde (ÇKKV) başvurulan Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) sıklıkla kullanılan yöntemlerden birisidir. Bu çalışmada, ihracat süreçlerinin daha başarılı bir şekilde yönetilmesi ve ihracat potansiyelinin arttırılabilmesi açısından İstanbul Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon İhracatçı Birlikleri (İTKİB) tarafından yönetilecek ve tekstil sektörüne hizmet verecek bir lojistik merkezin kurulacağı uygun yerin AHP yaklaşımı ile belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Uzman görüşleriyle gerçekleştirilen ikili karşılaştırmalar kullanılarak alternatifler arasında en uygun yer sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erdal, H., Aydoğmuş, H. Y. (2019). Selection of Logistics Center Location Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 6, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.506321

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Atabay, İ. (2005). İhracatçı İşletmeler ile İhracatçı Olmayan İşletmeler Arasındaki Farklılıklar ve İhracat Performansının Analizi: Zeytinyağı Sektöründe Bir İnceleme. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Gebze.
  2. Aydın, G.T. ve Öğüt, K.S. (2008). Avrupa ve Türkiye'de Lojistik Köyleri. 2. Uluslararası Demiryolu Sempozyumu, İstanbul. 2. Cilt, 1471-1481.
  3. Bozorgi-Amiri, A., Asvadi, S. (2015). A prioritization model for locating relief logistic centers using analytic hierarchy process with interval comparison matrix. Knowledge-Based Systems, 86, 173-181.
  4. Chen, Y., Qu, L. (2006). Evaluating the selection of logistics centre location using fuzzy MCDM model based on entropy weight. In Intelligent Control and Automation, 2006. WCICA 2006. The Sixth World Congress on (Vol. 2, 7128-7132). IEEE.
  5. Farahani, R. Z., SteadieSeifi, M., Asgari, N. (2010). Multiple criteria facility location problems: A survey. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(7), 1689-1709.
  6. Huang, H., Zhu, Y. (2014). The location of logistics center by AHP-GP based on convenient idea. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 6(7):1098-1102.
  7. İstanbul Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon İhracatçı Birlikleri (İTKİB) resmi internet sayfası, (http://www.itkib.org.tr/itkib/UyeListeleri/data/itkib_uye_liste.xls), Erişim tarihi: 06.11.2018.
  8. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A. (2006). Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1383-1401.
  9. Li, Y., Liu, X., Chen, Y. (2011). Selection of logistics center location using Axiomatic Fuzzy Set and TOPSIS methodology in logistics management. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7901-7908.
  10. Li-li, Q., Yan, C. (2007). An interactive integrated MCDM based on FANN and application in the selection of logistic center location. In Management Science and Engineering, 2007. ICMSE 2007. International Conference on (162-167). IEEE.
  11. Liu, X., Guo, X., Zhao, X. (2012). Study on Logistics Center Site Selection of Jilin Province. JSW, 7(8), 1799-1806.
  12. Önden, İ., Acar, A. Z., Eldemir, F. (2016). Evaluation of the logistics center locations using a multi-criteria spatial approach. Transport, 33(2), 1–13.
  13. Pramanik, S., Dalapati, S., Roy, T. K. (2016). Logistics center location selection approach based on neutrosophic multi-criteria decision making. New trends in neutrosophic theory and applications, Brussells, Pons Editions, 161-174.
  14. Regmi, M. B., Hanaoka, S. (2013). Location analysis of logistics centres in Laos. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 16(3), 227-242.
  15. Saaty, T., L. (1990). How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Prosess. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 15.
  16. Saygılı, M. S. (2014). Intermodal taşımacılığın maliyet avantajları: Karayolu-denizyolu entegrasyonu üzerine bir araştırma. Öneri Dergisi, 11(41), 203-214.
  17. Tang, X. L. (2016). Logistics Network Construction of Hazardous Goods Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 55, 463-468.
  18. Tanyaş, M. ve Arıkan, F., (2013). Bursa İli Lojistik Merkez Ön Fizibilite Raporu. Bursa Sanayici ve İş Adamları Derneği, Bursa.
  19. Tomić, V., Marinković, D., Marković, D. (2014). The selection of logistic centers location using multi-criteria comparison: case study of the Balkan Peninsula. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(10), 97-113.
  20. Tu, C. S., Chang, C. T., Chen, K. K., Lu, H. A. (2010). Applying an AHP-QFD conceptual model and zero-one goal programming to requirement-based site selection for an airport cargo logistics center. International Journal of İnformation and Management Sciences, 21(4), 407-30.
  21. Tuğba Turğut, B., Taş, G., Herekoğlu, A., Tozan, H., Vayvay, O. (2011). A fuzzy AHP based decision support system for disaster center location selection and a case study for Istanbul. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 20(5), 499-520.
  22. Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location. Transport, 25(4), 423-432.
  23. Wang, Y. J., Han, T. C., Chou, M. T. (2016). Applying fuzzy AHP in selection of transport modes for Kinmen military logistics. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 24(2), 222-232.
  24. Żak, J., Węgliński, S. (2014). The selection of the logistics center location based on MCDM/A methodology. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 555-564.
  25. Zhang, C., Pan, D. H. (2007). An Evaluation Model Based on Fuzzy Rule for Logistics Centers. Journal-Northeastern University Natural Science, 28(4), 596.