SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 6

Entelektüel Uyarımın Özyeterlilik Üzerindeki Etkisinde Kişi-İş Uyumunun İçsel Atıf Eksenli Aracılık Rolü

Metin Söylemez(İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-0291-2284
Metehan Tolon(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-0832-3632
Pages
45–52
Publication Date
2019-12-13
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bu çalışma, dönüşümsel liderlik davranışının özyeterlilik algısı üzerindeki etkisinin, işten kişiye doğru kişi-iş uyumu çerçevesinde bilişsel ve içsel atıf eksenli bir sürecin sonucu olduğunu ortaya koymasıyla örgütsel davranış yazınına önemli katkılar sunmaktadır.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bu çalışmada, dönüşümsel liderlik davranışı olarak entelektüel uyarımın, özyeterliliğe etkisi ve bu etkide kişi-iş uyumunun içsel atıf teorisi bakış açısından aracılık rolünün ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ankara'da faaliyet gösteren bir hizmet işletmesinin 206 çalışanından elde edilen veriler analizlerde kullanılmıştır.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bu çalışma, dönüşümsel liderlik davranışının özyeterlilik algısı üzerindeki etkisinin, işten kişiye doğru kişi-iş uyumu çerçevesinde bilişsel ve içsel atıf eksenli bir sürecin sonucu olduğunu ortaya koymasıyla örgütsel davranış yazınına önemli katkılar sunmaktadır.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Entelektüel uyarım · Özyeterlilik · Kişi-iş uyumu

Özet

Bu çalışmada, dönüşümsel liderlik davranışı olarak entelektüel uyarımın, özyeterliliğe etkisi ve bu etkide kişi-iş uyumunun içsel atıf teorisi bakış açısından aracılık rolünün ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda regresyon testlerine dayanan nicel bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Ankara'da faaliyet gösteren bir hizmet işletmesinin 206 çalışanından elde edilen veriler analizlerde kullanılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda, elde edilen bulgularla, entelektüel uyarımın özyeterliliği etkilediği ve bu etkide, kişi-iş uyumunun aracı rolü oynadığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, dönüşümsel liderlik davranışının özyeterlilik algısı üzerindeki etkisinin, işten kişiye doğru kişi-iş uyumu çerçevesinde bilişsel ve içsel atıf eksenli bir sürecin sonucu olduğunu ortaya koymasıyla örgütsel davranış yazınına önemli katkılar sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Söylemez, M., Tolon, M. (2019). Entelektüel Uyarımın Özyeterlilik Üzerindeki Etkisinde Kişi-İş Uyumunun İçsel Atıf Eksenli Aracılık Rolü. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 6, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.532307

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., ve Jung, D. I. (1999). Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of occupational organizational psychology, 72(4), 441-462.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
  3. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122.
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social-cognitive view: Englewood Cliffs.
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
  6. Bandura, A., ve Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of personality social psychology, 60(6), 941.
  7. Bandura, A., ve Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 87.
  8. Baron, R. M., ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  9. Bass, B. M., ve Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in organizational change development, 4(1), 231-272.
  10. Bass, B. M., ve Avolio, B. J. (1991). The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Form 5x. Center for Leadership Studies, State University of New York, Binhampton, NY.
  11. Bass, B. M., ve Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  12. Bong, M. (2001). Between-and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of educational psychology, 93(1), 23.
  13. Carless, S.A. (2005), ‘Person–Job Fit Versus Person–Organization Fit as Predictors of Organizational Attraction and Job Acceptance Intentions: A Longitudinal Study,’ Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 411–429.
  14. Clifford, S. A. (1989). Cause of termination and self-efficacy expectations as related to reemployment status.
  15. Conger, J. A., ve Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of management review, 12(4), 637-647.
  16. Edwards, J.R. (1991), ‘Person-Job Fit: A Conceptual Integration, Literature Review, and Methodological Critique,’ International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, 283–357.
  17. Field, A.(2013).Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, Sage, Londra
  18. French, J. R. P., Caplan, R. D., & Van Harrison, R. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
  19. Groeneveld, R. A. and Meeden, G. (1984), “Measuring Skewness and Kurtosis,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician), 33, 391-399
  20. Hackett, G. (1995). Self-efficacy in career choice and development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Changing Societies (pp. 232-258): Cambridge University Press.
  21. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press
  22. Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological review, 51(6), 358-374.
  23. Kanfer, R., ve Hulin, C. L. (1985). Individual differences in successful job searches following lay‐off. Personnel psychology, 38(4), 835-847.
  24. Kristof-Brown, A.L. (2000), ‘Perceived Applicant Fit: Distinguishing between Recruiters’ Perceptions of Person-Job and Person-Organization Fit,’ Personnel Psychology, 53, 643–671
  25. Kristof-Brown, A.L., Zimmerman, R.D., and Johnson, E.C. (2005), ‘Consequences of Individuals’ Fit at Work: A Meta-Analysis of Person-Job, Person-Organization, Person-Group, and PersonSupervisor Fit,’ Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
  26. Kristof, A.L. (1996), ‘Person-Organization Fit: An Integrative Review of its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications,’ Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
  27. Kristof-Brown, A. L., K. J. Jansen, and A. E. Colbert. 2002. A policy-capturing study of the simultaneous effects of fit with jobs, groups, and organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 87:985–93
  28. Krueger Jr, N. F., ve Dickson, P. R. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy and perceptions of opportunity and threat. Psychological reports, 72(3_suppl), 1235-1240.
  29. Kulviwat, S., C. Bruner II, G., ve P. Neelankavil, J. (2014). Self-efficacy as an antecedent of cognition and affect in technology acceptance. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(3), 190-199.
  30. Lent, R. W., ve Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of vocational Behavior, 30(3), 347-382.
  31. Liao, H., ve Chuang, A. (2007). Transforming service employees and climate: a multilevel, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships. Journal of applied psychology, 92(4), 1006.
  32. Manstead, Antony ve Hewstone Miles (1999), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, Blacwell Publishing.
  33. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 498 –512.
  34. Meindl, J. R. (1990). On leadership-an alternative to the conventional wisdom. Research in organizational behavior, 12, 159-203.
  35. Oude Groote Beverborg, A., Sleegers, P. J., Endedijk, M. D., ve van Veen, K. (2015). Towards sustaining levels of reflective learning: how do transformational leadership, task interdependence, and self-efficacy shape teacher learning in schools? Societies, 5(1), 187-219.
  36. Pirola-Merlo, A., Hartel, C. E. J., Mann, L., & Hirst, G. (2002). How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 561-581.
  37. Rafferty, A. E., ve Griffin, M. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The leadership quarterly, 15(3), 329-354. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology.
  38. Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. 1997. A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395–426.
  39. Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., & Martínez, I. M. (2012). We need a Hero! Toward a validation of the Healthy and Resilient Organization (HERO) Model. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 785-822.
  40. Schwarzer, R., ve Jerusalem, M. (1995). Optimistic self-beliefs as a resource factor in coping with stress. In Extreme stress and communities: Impact and intervention (pp. 159-177): Springer.
  41. Shamir, B. (1992). Attribution of Influence and Charisma to the Leader: The Romance of Leadership Revisited 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(5), 386-407.
  42. Shamir, B., House, R. J., ve Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization science, 4(4), 577-594.
  43. Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., ve Popper, M. (1998). Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates' attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors' appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 387-409.
  44. Skaalvik, E. M., ve Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching teacher education, 26(4), 1059-1069.
  45. Stajkovic, A. D., ve Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240.
  46. Stipek, D. J. (1983). A developmental analysis of pride and shame, Human Development, 26, 42-54.
  47. Talley, D., Goodwin, L., Ruzic, R., ve Fisler, S. (2011). Marine ecology as a framework for preparing the next generation of scientific leaders. Marine Ecology, 32(3), 268-277.
  48. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., ve Zhu, W. (2008). How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel psychology, 61(4), 793-825.
  49. Wood, R., ve Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of personality social psychology, 56(3), 407.
  50. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology.