Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

The Perspective and Integration of Turks in the Netherlands Towards Other Immigrants. (The Case of the City of Haarlem)

Hollanda’daki Türklerin Diğer Göçmenlere Bakış Açısı ve Sosyal Uyumu. (Haarlem Şehri Örneği)

Serpil Bardakçı Tosun(ALANYA ALAADDİN KEYKUBAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3393-5219
Pages
917–970
Publication Date
2026-08-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They feel uncomfortable with the increasing number of other immigrants and, at the same time, prefer to live and work with Dutch people rather than other immigrants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The first diplomatic relations between the Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, which began in 1612, were transformed into a direction that would continue migrant relations with the labour agreement signed on 19 August 1964.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There was a rapidly increasing labour migration from Turkey to the Netherlands until the end of the 1970s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They feel uncomfortable with the increasing number of other immigrants and, at the same time, prefer to live and work with Dutch people rather than other immigrants.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hollanda · Haarlem · Türkiye

Abstract

The first diplomatic relations between the Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, which began in 1612, were transformed into a direction that would continue migrant relations with the labour agreement signed on 19 August 1964. There was a rapidly increasing labour migration from Turkey to the Netherlands until the end of the 1970s. The Netherlands, one of the founding members of the European Union (EU), has continued to accept immigrants over time and remains one of the preferred countries due to its high standard of living. For the EU, immigration is a continuous issue due to labour shortages and a declining population, so they periodically increase immigration to fill this gap. However, migration is only attractive as long as it is manageable and regular, i.e. official. Otherwise, strict immigration laws can be enforced to prevent the entry of undesirable individuals. In this study, individuals in Haarlem, a city with a large Turkish population, were reached using the snowball method, and the data were interpreted using in-depth interviews and semi-structured interview techniques. The study found that Turks in the Netherlands have adapted to their host country and maintain a distance in their relationships with other immigrants. They feel uncomfortable with the increasing number of other immigrants and, at the same time, prefer to live and work with Dutch people rather than other immigrants.

Özet

Osmanlı Devleti ile Hollanda Krallığı arasında 1612 yılında başlayan ilk diplomatik ilişkiler, 19 Ağustos 1964’te imzalanan işgücü anlaşması ile göçmen ilişkilerinin devam edeceği bir yöne çevrilmiştir. Türkiye’den Hollanda’ya 1970’lerin sonuna kadar hızla artan bir işgücü göçü olmuştur. Avrupa Birliği (AB) kurucu ülkelerinden olan Hollanda zaman içerisinde göçmen almaya ve refah düzeyinin yüksek olması nedeniyle de tercih edilen ülkeler arasında olmaya devam etmektedir. AB için göç; işgücü açığı, azalan nüfusu nedeniyle süreklilik arz eden bir konu olduğu için bu açığı kapatmak adına dönem dönem göçmen alımını arttırmaktadırlar. Ancak göç konusu yönetilebilir ve düzenli yani resmi olduğu sürece çekicidir. Aksi takdirde seçemedikleri kişilerin ülkeye dahil olmaması için katı göç yasaları uygulayabilmektedirler. Bu çalışmada Türklerin yoğun yaşadığı şehirlerden Haarlem’de Kartopu Yöntemi ile kişilere ulaşılmış ve derinlemesine mülakat ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme tekniği ile veriler yorumlanmıştır. Çalışma neticesinde Hollanda’daki Türklerin yaşadıkları ülkeye uyum sağladığı ve diğer göçmenlerle ilişkilerinde mesafeli oldukları, diğer göçmenlerin sayısının artmasından rahatsızlık duydukları, aynı zamanda diğer göçmenlerden çok Hollandalılarla yaşamak ve çalışmak istedikleri tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tosun, S. B. (2026). The Perspective and Integration of Turks in the Netherlands Towards Other Immigrants. (The Case of the City of Haarlem). Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 917–970. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1851822

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (41)

  1. Ağca-Varoğlu, F. G. (2020). The everyday life experiences and coping processes of highly skilled immigrants in Germany. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS.2019-0124
  2. Alan, M. M., & Çelikkaya, S. (2024). A causality analysis between GDP and refugees: A comparative study of Türkiye and Jordan. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University, 12(2), 355–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1320493
  3. Altan, H. N., & Budak, M. M. (2023). The transformation of Germany’s immigration policies following the Second World War. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 22(4), 1409–1423.
  4. Baltacı, A. (2018). A conceptual review of sampling methods and the issue of sample size in qualitative research. BEÜ SBE Journal, 7(1), 231–274.
  5. Bozkoyun, M. (2024). A spatial analysis of Syrian refugees: The case of Elazığ Province. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University, 12(3), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1417249
  6. Carillo, M. R., et al. (2022). Immigrant integration and dual identity in labour market participation. Journal of Population Economics, 36(3), 69–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-022-00920-2
  7. Ceceli Köse, S. (2015). The Dilemma of integration: Expectations of second-generation immigrants from Türkiye in the Netherlands. İdealkent, (15), 100–118.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
  9. Crul, M., & Doomernik, J. (2003). The Turkish and Moroccan second generation in the Netherlands: Divergent trends between and polarisation within the two groups. International Migration Review, 37(4), 1039–1064.
  10. Crul, M., & Vermeulen, H. (2003). The second generation in Europe. International Migration Review, 37(4), 965–986.
  11. Ersanilli, E., & Koopmans, R. (2009). Ethnic retention and host culture adoption among Turkish immigrants in Germany, France and the Netherlands: A controlled comparison. Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB), 1–40.
  12. Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148
  13. Grix, J. (2010). The foundations of research. Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Ip, D., Inglis, C., & Wu, C. T. (1997). Concepts of citizenship and identity among recent Asian immigrants in Australia, Asian and Pacific. Migration Journal, 6(3–4), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719689700600306
  15. Indelicato, A., & Martín, J. C. (2024). The effects of three facets of national identity and other socioeconomic traits on attitudes towards immigrants. International Migration & Integration, 25, 645–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-023-01100-1
  16. Karaçay, İ. (2022). Turks we are proud of in the Netherlands…! ilhankaracay.com. https://www.ilhankaracay.com/hollandada-gurur-duydugumuz-turkler/ (Accessed 3 November 2022)
  17. Kolbaşı Muyan, G. (2019). Dutch migration integration policies: From liberalism to neoliberalism. Journal of Social Security, 9(1), 177–192.
  18. Kolbaşı Muyan, G. (2021). Transnational lives: Social security of Turkish citizens living in the Netherlands. Journal of the Institute of Turkish Studies, 72, 523–539.
  19. Lauglo, J. (2017). Does ethnic identification promote integration into the larger society? A study of youth in Oslo. Ethnicities, 17(3), 392–417.
  20. Marpsat, M., & Razafindratsima, N. (2010). Survey methods for hard-to-reach populations: Introduction to the special issue. Methodological Innovations Online, 5, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0014
  21. Nohlen, D., & Stöver, P. (2010). Elections in Europe: A data handbook (pp. 1–2102). Nomos Publishers.
  22. Özkan, Y. (2020). Research in the Netherlands: Turks and Moroccans are the groups most affected by discrimination. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-52930216 (Accessed 4 June 2020)
  23. Özkul, D. (2019). Transnationalism. In C. Inglis et al. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of international migration (pp. 433–449). Sage Publications.
  24. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications. https://aulasvirtuales.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods-by-michael-patton.pdf
  25. Pedraza, S., & Rumbaut, R. G. (1996). Origins and destinies: Immigration, race, and ethnicity in America. Wadsworth. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/3130714
  26. Portes, A., (1999). Conclusion: Towards a New World-the Origins and Effects of Transnational Activities, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 463-477.
  27. Simon, P. (2007). Ethnic statistics and data protection in the Council of Europe countries: Study report. Institut national d'études démographiques (Ined), 122–. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12204/rS86KZIBO4xB9gQobefr
  28. Sucu, N. (2024). Religion and belief in the Netherlands: Rapid change and diversity. Platform Magazine. https://www.platformdergisi.com/yazi/yazarlar/38024/hollandada-din-ve-inanc-hizli-degisim-ve-cesitlilik (Accessed 06 April 2024)
  29. Şahin, B. (2010). Turks in Germany (p. 271). Phoenix Publishing House.
  30. Turkınfo.nl. (2025, January 10). The Turkish population in the Netherlands: Official and unofficial data. Turkinfo. https://www.turkinfo.nl/hollanda-daki-turk-nufusu-resmi-ve-gayriresmi-veriler/38402
  31. Turper-Alışık, S., Altıok, B., Ağalday, B., & Köseoğlu-Darılmaz, F. (2022). Survey research on ethnic and migrant minorities: A methodological evaluation of studies in Türkiye. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (50), 294–310.
  32. UNHCR. (2007). Advisory opinion on the extraterritorial application of non-refoulement obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. European Human Rights Law Review, (5), 483.
  33. Vedder, P. H. (2005). Language, ethnic identity, and the adaptation of immigrant youth in the Netherlands. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(3), 396–416. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16669 Other online sources
  34. Countrymeters. (2025). Netherlands population. https://countrymeters.info/en/Netherlands
  35. Government of the Netherlands. (2022a). Changes to the civic integration system. https://www.government.nl/themes/migration-and-travel/integration-in-the-netherlands/civic-integration-act
  36. Government of the Netherlands. (2025b). The purpose of political parties. https://www.government.nl/topics/democracy/the-purpose-of-political-parties University of California, Irvine Libraries. (n.d.). What is immigration? https://guides.lib.uci.edu/immigrants/whatis
  37. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Interior Directorate General of Migration Management. (n.d.). Göç terimleri sözlüğü. https://www.goc.gov.tr/Kurumlar/Goc.Gov.Tr/Files/Goc_Terimleri_Sozlugu1.pdf
  38. Insamer. (2025). Hollanda ülke profili. https://www.insamer.com/tr/ulke-profili-hollanda/
  39. MIPEX (Migrant Integration Policy Index). (2025). Netherlands. https://www.mipex.eu/netherlands Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (n.d.). Dutch political landscape. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/hollanda-siyasi-gorunumu.tr.mfa
  40. RefugeeHelp. (2023, November 24). These are the consequences of the Dutch elections. https://www.refugeehelp.nl/en/asylum-refused/news/100290-these-are-the-consequences-of-the-dutch-elections
  41. Turkish Language Association. (2025). Güncel Türkçe sözlük. https://sozluk.gov.tr/ Wikipedia. (n.d.). List of political parties in the Netherlands. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_the_Netherlands