SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International / 2019 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Individuals with Moderate and Severe Intellectual Disabilities and Their Access to Education

Orta ve Ağır Düzeyde Zihin Yetersizliği Olan Bireyler ve Eğitime Erişimleri

Salih Nar(ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9801-4085
Atilla Cavkaytar(ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8067-1602
Pages
929–953
Publication Date
2019-07-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study also provides medium and their access to education for individuals with severe intellectual disability level in Turkey and what can be done for ensuring the normalization process were discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this article is to describe the characteristics of individuals with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities, to determine the needs of individuals based on these characteristics, to provide access to education and to make recommendations about what needs to be done in normalization process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Individuals with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities need more support than individuals with mild intellectual disabilities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study also provides medium and their access to education for individuals with severe intellectual disability level in Turkey and what can be done for ensuring the normalization process were discussed.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Orta ve ağır düzeyde zihin yetersizliği olan bireyler · normalleştirme süreci · kaynaştırma

Abstract

The aim of this article is to describe the characteristics of individuals with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities, to determine the needs of individuals based on these characteristics, to provide access to education and to make recommendations about what needs to be done in normalization process. Individuals with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities need more support than individuals with mild intellectual disabilities. Supports should be provided to identify the training needs of these individuals during the delivery of relevant supports and to provide access to education for individuals with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities. However, special education is an important subject of discussion as to how these requirements can be identified and provided with support for these needs and how the normalization process can be achieved through effective inclusion / integration practices. This study also provides medium and their access to education for individuals with severe intellectual disability level in Turkey and what can be done for ensuring the normalization process were discussed.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, orta ve ağır düzeyde zihin yetersizliği olan bireylerin özelliklerini betimlemek, bu özelliklere dayalı olarak bireylerin gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesi ve eğitime erişimlerinin sağlanması amacıyla normalleştirme sürecinde yapılması gerekenlere ilişkin önerilerde bulunmaktır. Orta ve ağır düzeyde zihin yetersizliği olan bireyler, hafif düzeyde zihin yetersizliği olan bireylere oranla daha fazla desteğe gereksinim duymaktadırlar. İlgili desteklerin sunulması sürecinde bu bireylerin eğitim gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesi ve orta ve ağır düzeyde zihin yetersizliği olan bireylerin eğitime erişimlerinin sağlanması için desteklerin sunulması gerekmektedir. Ancak bu gereksinimlerin belirlenmesi, söz konusu gereksinimlere yönelik desteklerin sunulması ve etkili kaynaştırma/bütünleştirme uygulamalarıyla normalleşme sürecinin nasıl sağlanabileceği özel eğitimin önemli tartışma konusudur. Bu çalışmada da Türkiye’de orta ve ağır düzeyde zihin yetersizliği olan bireylerin eğitime erişimlerini sağlamak ve normalleşme sürecinin sağlanmasına yönelik yapılabilecekler tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Nar, S., Cavkaytar, A. (2019). Individuals with Moderate and Severe Intellectual Disabilities and Their Access to Education. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 929–953. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.578185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. AAIDD (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th edition). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
  2. Akay, E. (2016). Kaynaştırma ortamında eğitim alan işitme engelli öğrencilere destek özel eğitim hizmeti sunan eğitimciye yönelik mentörlük sürecinin incelenmesi Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  3. Batu, S., & Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2011). Kaynaştırma. Ankara: Kök Yayıncılık.
  4. Batu, E. S., Cüre, G., Nar, S., Gövercin, D., & Keskin, M. (2018). Türkiye'de ilkokul ve ortaokullarda yapılan kaynaştırma araştırmalarının gözden geçirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 19(3), 577-614. doi: 10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.336925
  5. Beirne Smith, M., Ittenbach, R. F., & Patton, J. R. (1998). Mental Retardation (5. Baskı). Prentice Hall.
  6. Bouck, E. C. (2009). Functional curriculum models for secondary students with mild mental impairment. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 435-443.
  7. Browder, D., Flowers, C., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Karvonen M., Spooner, F. & Algozzine R. (2004). The alignment of alternate assesment content with academic and functional curricula. The journal of special education. 37(4), 211-223.
  8. Carter, E. W. (2018). Supporting the social lives of secondary students with severe disabilities: Considerations for effective intervention. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26(1), 52-61.
  9. Cavkaytar, A. (2000). Zihin engellilerin eğitim amaçları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (1), 115-121.
  10. Cavkaytar, A., Melekoğlu, M., & Yıldız, G. (2016). Geçmişten günümüze özel gereksinimli olma ve zihin yetersizliği: Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de kavramların evrimi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Eğitim Özel Sayısı, 111-22.
  11. Cordeiro, L., Ballinger, E., Hagerman, R., & Hessl, D. (2011). Clinical assessment of DSM-IV anxiety disorders in fragile X syndrome: prevalence and characterization. Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 3(1), 57
  12. Craig, E. M. (2013). At the Dawn of Civilization: Intellectual Disability in Prehistory and Ancient Times (9000 CE to 500 CE). In Wehmeyer, M. L. (Ed.), The Story of Intellectual Disability: An Evolution of Meaning, Understanding, & Public Perception. (s. 19-46). Brookes Publishing Company.
  13. Cushing, L. S., Clark, N. M., Carter, E. W., & Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Access to the general education curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(2), 6-13.
  14. Division for Early Childhood/National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Early childhood inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC).
  15. Dymond, S. K., Renzaglia, A., Rosenstein, A., Chun, E. J., Banks, R. A., Niswander, V., & Gilson, C. L. (2006). Using a participatory action research approach to create a universally designed inclusive high school science course: A case study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(4), 293-308.
  16. Elford, M.D. (2013). Using tele-coaching to increase behavior-specific praise delivered by secondary teachers in an augmented reality learning environment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, ABD: University of Kansas.
  17. Eripek, S. (2007). İlköğretimde Kaynaştırma (1. Baskı). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  18. Ferguson, P. (2013) The Development of Systems of Supports: Intellectual Disability in Middle Modern Times (1800 CE to 1899 CE). In Wehmeyer, M. L. (Ed.), The Story of Intellectual Disability: An Evolution of Meaning, Understanding, & Public Perception. (s. 79- 116). Brookes Publishing Company.
  19. Friend, M. (2011). Special Education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals. Pearson: Boston.
  20. Gargiulo, R. M. & Bouck, E. C. (2017). Special education in contemporary society: An introduction to exceptionality. (6th edition). Sage Publications.
  21. Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (2003). Exceptional Learners. Introduction to special education (9 th edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  22. Harris, J. C., & Greenspan, S. (2016). Definition and Nature of Intellectual Disability. Singh, N. N. (Ed.). In Handbook of evidence-based practices in intellectual and developmental disabilities. (pp. 11-39). Springer.
  23. Henley, M., Ramsey, R. S., & Algozzine, R. F. (2006). Characteristics of and strategies for teaching students with mild disabilities. Allyn & Bacon, 75 Arlington Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA 02116.
  24. Hew, K.F. & Knapczyk, D. (2007). Analysis of ill-structured problem solving, mentoring functions, and perceptions of practicum teachers and mentors toward online mentoring in a field-based practicum. Instructional science, 35 (1), 1-40.
  25. Heward, W. L. (2013). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. (10th edition). New Jersey, NY: Pearson.
  26. Houwen, S., van der Putten, A. & Vlaskamp, C. (2014). A systematic review of the effects of motor interventions to improve motor, cognitive, and/or social functioning in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmantal Disabilities, 35, 2093-2116.
  27. Hulbert‐Williams, L., & Hastings, R. P. (2008). Life events as a risk factor for psychological problems in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A critical review. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(11), 883-895.
  28. Kurth, J. A., Lyon, K. J., & Shogren, K. (2015). Supports provided to students with severe disabilities in inclusive schools: Lessons learned from schools implementing inclusive practices. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 261-274.
  29. Lee, S. H., Wehmeyer, M. L., Soukup, J. H., & Palmer, S. B. (2010). Impact of curriculum modifications on access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional children, 76(2), 213-233.
  30. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2004). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective differentiated instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  31. McLeskey, J., Landers, E., Williamson, P., & Hoppey, D. (2012). Are we moving toward educating students with disabilities in less restrictive settings? The Journal of Special Education, 46, 131-140.
  32. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). “Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği”. Ankara: Özel Eğitim Rehberlik ve Danışma Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
  33. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018) Milli Eğitim İstatistikleri Örgün Eğitim 2017/2018. Ankara.
  34. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2016). “Destek Eğitim Odası Kılavuz Kitapçığı”. Ankara. Erişim tarihi: 24 Aralık 2018.
  35. Oliver, C., Petty, J., Ruddick, L., & Bacarese-Hamilton, M. (2012). The association between repetitive, self-injurious and aggressive behavior in children with severe intellectual disability. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 42(6), 910-919.
  36. Schalock, R. L., & Luckasson, R. (2015). A systematic approach to subgroup classification in intellectual disability. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 53(5), 358-366.
  37. Schalock R. L. & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2013). The Parent Movement: Late Modern Times (1950 CE to 1980 CE). In Wehmeyer, M. L. (Ed.), The Story of Intellectual Disability: An Evolution of Meaning, Understanding, & Public Perception. (s. 187-232). Brookes Publishing Company.
  38. Shepley, C., Lane, J. D., Grisham-Brown, J., Spriggs, A. D., & Winstead, O. (2017). Effects of a Training Package to Increase Teachers’ Fidelity of Naturalistic Instructional Procedures in Inclusive Preschool Classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(4), 321-339.
  39. Smith, J. D., Noll, S., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2013). In Search of a Science: Intellectual Disability in Late Modern Times (1900 to 1930). In Wehmeyer, M. L. (Ed.), The Story of Intellectual Disability: An Evolution of Meaning, Understanding, & Public Perception. (s. 117-156). Brookes Publishing Company.
  40. Smith, S. J. (2007). Cognitive and Developmental Disabilities. Meyen, E. L. and Bui Y. N. (Eds.) In Exceptional Children in Today's Schools: What Teachers Need to Know. Denver, CO: Love.
  41. Spooner, F., Dymond, S. K., Smith, A., & Kennedy, C. H. (2006). What we know and need to know about accessing the general curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(4), 277-283.
  42. Sucuoğlu, B. (2017). Zihin engelliler ve eğitimleri (9. Baskı). Ankara: Kök Yayıncılık.
  43. The Association for Person with Severe Disabilities [TASH] (2000). TASH resolution on the people for whom TASH advocates. www.tash.org
  44. Thompson, J. R., Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., & Seo, H. (2017). The Support Paradigm and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Singh, N. N. (Eds.). In Handbook of Positive Psychology in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities:Translating Research into Practice (pp. 23-36). Springer International Publishing.
  45. Thompson, J. R., Walker, V. L., Shogren, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2018). Expanding Inclusive Educational Opportunities for Students With the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities Through Personalized Supports. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(6), 396-411.
  46. Thompson, J. R., Wehmeyer, M. L., Hughes, C., Shogren, K. A., Palmer, S. B., & Seo, H. (2014). The Supports Intensity Scale–Children's Version: Preliminary Reliability and Validity. Inclusion, 2(2), 140-149.
  47. Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2013). Exceptional lives: special education in today’s schools. (7th edition). New Jersey, NY: Pearson.
  48. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2002). Türkiye Özürlüler Araştırması. T. C. Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Kurumu Başkanlığı. Ankara: Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü Matbaası.
  49. U.S. Department of Education. (2011). 33th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
  50. Wehmeyer, M., Chapman, T. E., Little, T. D., Thompson, J. R., Schalock, R., & Tasse, M. J. (2009). Efficacy of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) to predict extraordinary support needs. American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 114(1), 3-14.
  51. Wehmeyer, M. L. (2007). Promoting self-determination in students with developmental disabilities. Guilford Press.
  52. Westling, D. L., & Fox, L. (2004). Teaching students with severe disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  53. Wickham, P. (2013). Poverty and The Emergence of Charity: Intellectual Disability in the Middle Ages (500 CE to !500 CE). In Wehmeyer, M. L. (Ed.), The Story of Intellectual Disability: An Evolution of Meaning, Understanding, & Public Perception. (s. 47- 62). Brookes Publishing Company.
  54. World Health Organization [WHO] (2011). World report on disability. Erişim tarihi: 27.12.2018. www.aaidd.org/sis/product-information/benefits
  55. Thompson, J. R., Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., & Seo, H. (2017). The Support Paradigm and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Singh, N. N. (Eds.). In Handbook of Positive Psychology in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities:Translating Research into Practice (pp. 23-36). Springer International Publishing.
  56. World Health Organization [WHO] (2011). World report on disability. Erişim tarihi: 27.12.2018. www.aaidd.org/sis/product-information/benefits