SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Brand Architecture in Media Sector: The Case of Netflix

Medya Sektöründe Marka Mimarisi: Netflix Örneği

Onur TÜRKER
Parisa ALİZADEHFANAELOO
Hacer Handan DEMİR
Pages
1264–1280
Publication Date
2021-04-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of research, it is adjusted that in terms of brand architecture features how there is a difference between Netflix and its series, differences between gender groups and between professional groups as well.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was identified the strategic position of brand pertaining brand architecture focused on studies about retailer brands, consumer product brands, service brands, industrial product brands, country and city brands.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In related study, in Istanbul 300 people who follow Netflix and it’s publications completed the questionnaires.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of research, it is adjusted that in terms of brand architecture features how there is a difference between Netflix and its series, differences between gender groups and between professional groups as well.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marka Mimarisi · Cezbedicilik · Merkezilik

Abstract

In this study, it was identified the strategic position of brand pertaining brand architecture focused on studies about retailer brands, consumer product brands, service brands, industrial product brands, country and city brands. Furthermore, there are studies in sport brands, art brands, policy brands, educational brands, drug brands and brands actuate in international area context in brand architecture. The purpose of this study is to designate differences between Netflix as major brand and series as sub-brands published in Netflix, in terms of brand architecture characteristics. In related study, in Istanbul 300 people who follow Netflix and it’s publications completed the questionnaires. As a result of research, it is adjusted that in terms of brand architecture features how there is a difference between Netflix and its series, differences between gender groups and between professional groups as well.

Özet

Markanın stratejik olarak ne konumda olduğunu gösteren marka mimarisiyle ilgili yazında yapılmış çalışmalar perakendeci markalar, tüketici ürünü markaları, hizmet markaları, endüstriyel ürün markaları, ülke ve şehir markaları üzerine yoğunlaşmıştır. Ayrıca yazında spor markaları, sanat markaları, politika markaları, eğitim markaları, ilaç markası ve uluslararası alanda faaliyet gösteren markalara ilişkin de marka mimarisi çalışmaları bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Netflix ana markası ve Netflix’te yayınlanan diziler yani alt markaları arasında marka mimarisi özellikleri açısından farklılıkları ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmada İstanbul ilinde Netflix ve yayınlarını izleyen 300 kişiye anket uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda Netflix ve alt markaları arasında marka mimarisi özellikleri açısından ve ayrıca cinsiyet ve meslek grupları arasında farklılıkların nasıl bir şekilde olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKER, O., ALİZADEHFANAELOO, P., DEMİR, H. H. (2021). Brand Architecture in Media Sector: The Case of Netflix. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 1264–1280. https://ajindex.com/articles/135997

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. About Netflix. Netflix Media Center, 17 Şubat 2021 tarihinde http://www.netflix.com/en/about-netflix. adresinden erişildi. Aaker, D. A. ve Joachimsthaler, E. (2000). Brand leadership second edition. The Free Press.
  2. Aaker, D.A. ve Joachimsthaler, E. (2000). The brand relationship spectrum: the key to the brand archıtecture challenge. Calıfornıa Management Revıew, 42 (4), 8-23.
  3. Beaton, A. A., Funk, D. C., Ridinger, L. ve Jordan, J. (2011). Sport involvement: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Sport management review, 14(2), 126-140.
  4. Blair, T., Burrer, T., Garcia, J., Hernandez, A., Li-Southwick, Q. Y., Logar, K. ve Porter, L. (2019) Netflıx Company Analysıs (PDF Belgesi). 17 Şubat 2021 tarihinde http://tessacreates.com/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Netflix-CompanyAnalysis.pdf adresinden erişildi. Dauglas, S., Craig, S. ve Edwin, N. (2001). Integrating branding strategy across markets: building ınternational brand architecture. Journal of İnternational Marketing, 9(2), 97-111.
  5. Dewhirst, T. (2018). Into the black: Marlboro Brand Architecture, Packaging And Marketing Communication Of Relative Harm. Tobacca Control, 27(2), 240-242.
  6. Dinnie, K. (2018) Contingent self-definition and amorphous regions: A dynamic approach to place brand architecture. Marketing Theory, 18(1), 31-53
  7. Esbjberg, L. ve Larsen, T. B. (2009). The brand architecture of grocery retailers: Setting material and symbolic boundaries for consumer choice. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(5), 414-423.
  8. Freire J. (2016). Managing destination brand architecture – The case of Cascais Municipality. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 12(1), 78-90.
  9. Friedmann, E. ve Lowengart, O. (2019). Gender segmentation to increase brand preference? The role of product involvement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(3), 408-420. González-Chans, C., Membiela-Pollán, M. ve Cortés-Cuns, M. (2020). Relationship marketing and brand community: the case of Netflix. Revista de Marketing Aplicado, 24(2), 251-274.
  10. Harish, R. (2008). Brand architecture and its application in strategic marketing: The example of L’Oréal. The Icfai University Journal of Brand Management, 6(2), 40-51.
  11. Hasanbegovic, D. (2011). Corporate reputation and brand architecture: The debate. See Journal, 6(2), 37.43. Horng, J. S., Liu, C. H., Chou, H. Y. ve Tsai, C. Y. (2012). Understanding the impact of culinary brand equity and destination familiarity on travel intentions. Tourism management, 33(4), 815-824.
  12. Jyrama, A. S. Kajalo, Johannson,