Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 9

A COMPARISON OF TURKEY'S INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL AUDITING STANDARDS WITH USA GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS- EU 8TH DIRECTIVE AND INTENATIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS

Pages
52–78
Publication Date
2005-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of these comparements it is found that Capital Market Board regulations are more hormonious with USA Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, EU 8th Directive and International Auditing Standards than Law No. 3568.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to compare the statements about independent external auditing standards exist in Capital Market Board regulations and The Independent Accountancy, Certified Public Accountancy and Certified Public Accuntancy under Pledge Law No. 3568 with auditing standarts presented at USA Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, EU 8th Directive and International Auditing Standards and to determine the lack of harmony and deficiencies at the extent of this subject.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to compare the statements about independent external auditing standards exist in Capital Market Board regulations and The Independent Accountancy, Certified Public Accountancy and Certified Public Accuntancy under Pledge Law No. 3568 with auditing standarts presented at USA Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, EU 8th Directive and International Auditing Standards and to determine the lack of harmony and deficiencies at the extent of this subject.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of these comparements it is found that Capital Market Board regulations are more hormonious with USA Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, EU 8th Directive and International Auditing Standards than Law No. 3568.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:USA Generally Accepted Auditing Standards · EU Sth Directive · Intemational Auditing Standards and Turkey's Auditing Standards

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the statements about independent external auditing standards exist in Capital Market Board regulations and The Independent Accountancy, Certified Public Accountancy and Certified Public Accuntancy under Pledge Law No. 3568 with auditing standarts presented at USA Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, EU 8th Directive and International Auditing Standards and to determine the lack of harmony and deficiencies at the extent of this subject. As a result of these comparements it is found that Capital Market Board regulations are more hormonious with USA Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, EU 8th Directive and International Auditing Standards than Law No. 3568.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dönmez, A., Berberoğlu, B., Ersoy, A. (2005). A COMPARISON OF TURKEY'S INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL AUDITING STANDARDS WITH USA GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS- EU 8TH DIRECTIVE AND INTENATIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 9, 52–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/1358110

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...