SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 3

Eyes Don't Lie! Visual Preferences: Eye-Tracking Study on Unplanned Food Selections in Fine Dining Restaurants

Neslihan Serçeoğlu(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1549-0834
Mehmet Necati Erkem(AĞRI İBRAHİM ÇEÇEN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3633-3969
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-01-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal how consumers' eye movements guide their selection decisions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consumer food choices are often treated as conscious decisions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, recent evidence using eye-tracking methodology demonstrates that consumers' visual attention processes significantly influence their decision-making.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal how consumers' eye movements guide their selection decisions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:eye-tracking · food selection · consumer preferences

Abstract

Consumer food choices are often treated as conscious decisions. However, recent evidence using eye-tracking methodology demonstrates that consumers' visual attention processes significantly influence their decision-making. This method is crucial for understanding the factors that affect consumers' gaze behavior. This research employs eye-tracking technology to investigate how consumers make food selections in fine-dining restaurants, focusing on unplanned choices. The study monitors consumers' menu examination processes using an eye-tracking device, identifying focal points such as gaze duration and fixation count. The findings reveal how consumers' eye movements guide their selection decisions. In particular, the visual presentation of the dish and familiarity with it have been shown to be influential in consumer preferences. In an experiment conducted with 25 participants, it was found that the most fixated-upon dish was not necessarily the one ordered, indicating that the intensity of focus and gaze behavior do not directly determine decisions. However, prior experience with the dishes strongly influenced the decision-making process. In this respect, the research critically examines the “attention = choice” assumption in eye-tracking studies. From an industry perspective, it demonstrates that simply captivating visuals are not enough; menu design must be integrated with customer experience management and familiarity strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Serçeoğlu, N., Erkem, M. N. (2026). Eyes Don't Lie! Visual Preferences: Eye-Tracking Study on Unplanned Food Selections in Fine Dining Restaurants. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), Volume: 14 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30519/ahtr.1673497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (60)

  1. Bell, D. R., Corsten, D., & Knox, G. (2011). From point of purchase to path to purchase: how preshopping factors drive unplanned buying. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.75.1.31
  2. Bhandari, U., Chang, K., & Nebem, T. (2019). Understanding the impact of perceived visual aesthetics on user evaluations: An emotional perspective. Information & Management, 56, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.07.003
  3. Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16–29.
  4. Bowen, J. T., & Morris, A. J. (1995). Menu design: Can menus sell?. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 7(4), 4-9.
  5. Cameron A. J., Charlton E., Ngan W. W., & Sacks G. A. (2016). Systematic review of the effectiveness of supermarket-based interventions involving product, promotion, or place on the healthiness of consumer purchases. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 5, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-016-0172-8
  6. Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000), A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81.
  7. Chocarro, R., Cortinas, M. & Villanueva, A. (2022). Attention to product images in an online retailing store: an eye-tracking study considering consumer goals and type of product. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 23(4), 257-281.
  8. Chon, A. (1990). Study of customer loyalty and ımage of fine-dining restaurant. Tourism Review, 45(2), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb058040
  9. Dai, J., Cone, J. & Moher, J. (2020). Perceptual salience influences food choices independently of health and taste preferences. Cogn. Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0203-2
  10. Dong, Y., Huang, Y., Hu, P., Zhang, P & Wang, Y. (2023). The effect of picture attributes of online ordering pages on visual attention and user experience. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 96, 103477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103477
  11. Doolan, K. J., Breslin, G., Hanna, D., Murphy, K., & Gallagher, A. M. (2014). Visual attention to food cues in obesity: an eye-tracking study. Obesity, 22, 2501-2507. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20884
  12. Duong, X. L., & Liaw, S. Y. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of Online Shopping Addiction Scale (OSAS). Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 32(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2021.1938330
  13. Feng, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., Wu, M., & Yang, Q. (2024). Impulse buying behavior during livestreaming: Moderating effects of scarcity persuasion and price perception. Heliyon, 10, e28347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28347
  14. Fikri, M. K. R., & Ramadhan, A. S. (2011). The effect of menu design on customer purchase ıntention: a case study of ‘waroeng mas kemal’ restaurant. Journal of Business Strategy and Execution, 3(2), 137-153.
  15. Garcia-Burgos, D., Lao, J., Munsch, S., & Caldara, R. (2017). Visual attention to food cues is differentially modulated by gustatoryhedonic and post-ingestive attributes. Food Research International, 97, 199-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.04.011
  16. Garcia-Segovia, P., Harrington, R. J., & Seo, H. S. (2015). Influences of table setting and eating location on food acceptance and intake. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 1-7.
  17. Gölemezli, M. (2022). Duyusal pazarlamada görsel unsurların tüketicilerin organik ürün algısı ve tercihindeki rolü: zeytinyağı ambalajı üzerine bir araştırma. Doctoral Dissertation, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Türkiye.
  18. Huddleston, P. T., Behe, B. K., Driesener, C., & Minahan, S. (2018). Inside-outside: Using eye-tracking to investigate search-choice processes in the retail environment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 85-93.
  19. Hummel, G., Ehret, J., Zerweck, I., Winter, S. S., & Stroebele-Benschop, N. (2018). How eating behavior, food stimuli and gender may affect visual attention – An eye tracking study. Eating Behaviors, 31, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.08.002
  20. Jantathai, S., Danner, L., Joechl, M., & Dürrschmid, K. (2013). Gazing behavior, choice and color of food: Does gazing behavior predict choice?. Food Research International, 54(2), 1621-1626.
  21. Karl, M., Monica Chien, P., & Ong, F. (2021). Impulse buying behaviour in tourism: A new perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 90, 103136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103136
  22. Kimiagari, S., & Malafe, N. S. A. (2021). The role of cognitive and affective responses in the relationship between internal and external stimuli on online impulse buying behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102567
  23. Köster, E. P., & Mojet, J. (2018). Complexity of consumer perception: Thoughts on pre–product launch research. In Methods in Consumer Research, Volume 1 (pp. 23-45). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102089-0.00002-9
  24. Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332-351.
  25. Kuoppa P., Pulkkinen K., Tarvainen M. P., Lankinen M., Lapveteläinen A., Sinikallio S., & Närväinen J. (2016). Psychophysiological responses to positive and negative food and nonfood visual stimuli. J. Neurosc. Psychol. Econom., 9(2), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000053
  26. Lee, J. I., Ren, T., & Park, J. (2021). Investigating travelers’ multi-impulse buying behavior in airport duty-free shopping for Chinese traveler: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Journal of Air Transport Management, 92, 102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102023
  27. Lee, Y. M., & Wei. C. V. (2024). Consumer visual attention to food allergen information on restaurant menus: an eye-tracking study. British Food Journal, 126(6), 2454–2476. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2023-0156
  28. Lynch Jr, J. G., & Ariely, D. (2000). Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality, and distribution. Marketing science, 19(1), 83-103.
  29. McCall, M., & Lynn, A. (2008). The effects of restaurant menu item descriptions on perceptions of quality, price and purchase intention. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 11(4), 439-445.
  30. Melendrez-Ruiz, J., Dujourdy, L., Goisbault, I., Charrier, J. C., Pagnat, K., Nicklaus, S., Arvisenet, G., & Chambaron, S. (2022). “You look at it, but will you choose it”: Is there a link between the foods consumers look at and what they ultimately choose in a virtual supermarket?. Food Quality and Preference, 98, 104510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104510
  31. Mora, M., Romeo-Arroyo, E., Chaya, C., Gayoso, L., Larranaga-Ayastuy, E., & Vazquez-Araujo, L. (2023). Eating with the eyes? Tracking food choice in restaurant’s menu. Food Quality and Preference, 110, 104956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104956
  32. Mumcu, Y., & Kimzan, H. S. (2015). The effect of visual product aesthetics on consumers’ price sensitivity. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 528-534.
  33. Ninh Do, H., Shih, W., & An Ha, Q. (2020). Effects of mobile augmented reality apps on impulse buying behavior: An investigation in the tourism field. Heliyon, 6, e04667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04667
  34. Nyrhinen, J., Sirola, A, Koskelainen, T., Munnukka, J., & Wilska, T. A. (2024). Online antecedents for young consumers’ impulse buying behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, 108129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108129
  35. Okuyan, B. (2024). Zaman Kısıtının Mobil Perakendecilik Uygulamalarında Satın Alma Öncesi Bilgi Arama Davranışına Etkisi: Göz Takibi Yöntemiyle Bir İnceleme. Master Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  36. Olson, J. C., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Cue utilization in the quality perception process. The Association for Consumer Research, 2, 167-179.
  37. Ozdemir, B., & Caliskan, O. (2015). Menu design: a review of literature. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 18(3), 189-206.
  38. Papies E. K. (2017). Situating interventions to bridge the intention–behaviour gap: A framework for recruiting nonconscious processes for behaviour change. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Comp., 11, e12323. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12323
  39. Puurtinen, M., Hoppu, U., Puputti, S., Mattila, S., & Sandell, M. (2021). Investigating visual attention toward foods in a salad buffet with mobile eye tracking. Food Quality and Preference, 93, 104290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104290
  40. Raghubir P. (2012). Are visual perceptual biases hard-wired?. In M. Wedel, & R. Pieters (Ed.s), Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action (pp. 143-166). Erlbaum.
  41. Reale, S. & Flint, S. W. (2016). The Impact of Menu Label Design on Visual Attention, Food Choice and Recognition: An Eye Tracking Study. Journal of Sensory Studies, 31(4), 328-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12216
  42. Sample, K. L., Hagtvedt, H., & Brasel, S. A. (2020). Components of visual perception in marketing contexts: a conceptual framework and review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 405-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00684-4
  43. Sands, F. S. (2009). Sample size analysis for brain collection (EEG) methodologies. White Paper.
  44. Schmidt, R., Lüthold, P., Kittel, R., Tetzlaff, A., & Hilberg, A. (2016). Visual attentional bias for food in adolescents with binge-eating disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 80, 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.05-016
  45. Spence, C., (2016). Multisensory packaging design: color, shape, texture, sound, and smell. In P. Burgess (Ed.), Integrating the packaging and product experience in food and beverages: a road-map to consumer satisfaction (pp. 1-22). Woodhead Publishing.
  46. Spielvogel, I., Matthes, J., Naderer, B., & Karsay, K. (2018). A treat for the eyes. An eye-tracking study on children's attention to unhealthy and healthy food cues in media content. Appetite, 125, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.033
  47. Stasi A., Songa G., Mauri M., Ciceri A., Diotallevi F., Nardone G., & Russo V. (2018). Neuromarketing empirical approaches and food choice: A systematic review. Food Res. Int., 108, 650–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.049
  48. Sternquist, B., Sang- Eun, B., & Jin, B. (2004). The dimensionality of price perceptions: a cross cultural comparison of Asian consumers. International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research, 14(1), 83-100.
  49. Suher, J., & Hoyer, W. D. (2020). The moderating effect of buying impulsivity on the dynamics of unplanned purchasing motivations. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(3), 548-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720912284
  50. Suzuki, S., Cross, L., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2017). Elucidating the underlying components of food valuation in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 20(12), 1780-1786.
  51. Şengör, G. F. Ü., & Ceylan, Z. (2018). Türk mutfağında su ürünleri kültürü ve önemi. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 14(4), 386-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.22392/egirdir.414488
  52. Toepel, U., Knebel, J.-F., Hudry, J., le Coutre, J., & Murray, M. M. (2009). The brain tracks the energetic value in food images. NeuroImage, 44(3), 967–974.
  53. Vermeir, I., & Roose, G. (2020). Visual design cues impacting food choice: a review and future research agenda. Foods, 9(10), 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101495
  54. Vu, T. M. H., Tu, V. P., & Duerrschmid, K. (2016). Design factors influence consumers’ gazing behaviour and decision time in an eye-tracking test: A study on food images. Food Quality and Preference, 47, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.008
  55. Vu, T. M. H., Tu, V. P., & Duerrschmid, K. (2018). Eye-tracking test design influences the relationship between gazing behaviour and evaluation decision. Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment, 68(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1515/boku-2017-0021
  56. Wadhera, D., & Capaldi-Phillips, E. D. (2014). A review of visual cues associated with food on food acceptance and consumption. Eating Behaviors, 15(1), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.11.003.
  57. Wansink, B., Painter, J., & Van Ittersum, K. (2001). Descriptive menu labels’ effect on sales. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administrative Quarterly, 42, 68-72.
  58. Yalçın, I., & Mankan, E. (2024). Osmanlı saray mutfağındaki çorbaların günümüz beslenme alışkanlıklarındaki yeri. Toros University Journal of Food, Nutrition and Gastronomy, 1, 35-47.
  59. Yang, F., Tang, J., Men, J., & Zheng, X. (2021). Consumer perceived value and impulse buying behavior on mobile commerce: The moderating effect of social influence. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102683
  60. Youssef, J., Juravle, G., Youssef, L., Woods, A., & Spence, C. (2015). Aesthetic plating: A preference for oblique lines ascending to the right. Flavour, 4(27), 2-10.