Journals / Abant Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Investigation of Epstein-Barr Virus Antibodies

Mustafa Behçet(BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-5676-6983
Ayça Çisem Harre(BOLU ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0009-0001-7708-8974
Fatma Avcıoğlu(BOLU ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0002-6011-7775
Elif Soysal(BOLU ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0009-0007-4752-680X
Sare Aybek(BOLU ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0009-0004-6205-1513
Hakan Burak Çelik(BOLU ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0009-0008-9145-7191
Yusuf Afşar(BOLU ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0003-3316-3618
Pages
38–44
Publication Date
2026-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In conclusion, the rate of exposure to EBV in this study was 92%, and the rate of atypical serological profiles was 7.5%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), also known as human herpesvirus 4 (HHV-4), causes mononucleosis in 30-50% of adolescents and adults.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to investigate the frequency of EBV-specific VCA-IgM, VCA-IgG, and EBNA-1 IgG antibodies and atypical antibody profiles in patients of different ages with suspected EBV infection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In conclusion, the rate of exposure to EBV in this study was 92%, and the rate of atypical serological profiles was 7.5%.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Epstein-Barr Virus · EBV Antibodies · Atypical Serological Profile

Abstract

Objective: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), also known as human herpesvirus 4 (HHV-4), causes mononucleosis in 30-50% of adolescents and adults. As EBV is an oncogenic virus and is responsible for the etiology of many idiopathic diseases, determining the seroprevalence of EBV antibodies in the community is important for identifying individuals at risk. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of EBV-specific VCA-IgM, VCA-IgG, and EBNA-1 IgG antibodies and atypical antibody profiles in patients of different ages with suspected EBV infection. Materials and Methods: Serological test results (VCA-IgM, VCA-IgG and EBNA-1 IgG) of serum samples of patients with suspected of having EBV between 2021 and 2023 EBV were retrospectively examined and evaluated. These tests were conducted using the chemilumin escence immunoassay (CLIA) method with an Architect i2000SR analyser (Architect, Abbott). Results: A total of 3,248 serum samples (49.6% male and 50.5% female) were evaluated. Seronegativity was found in 8% of patients, acute infection in 1.3%, past infection in 83.2%, and an atypical serological profile in 7.6%. Seronegativity and acute infections were more prevalent in the 1–18 age group, whereas past infections were more prevalent in the 41–70 age group. The prevalence of atypical serological profiles was found to be 7.5%. Conclusion: In conclusion, the rate of exposure to EBV in this study was 92%, and the rate of atypical serological profiles was 7.5%. These rates are consistent with those observed in previous studies conducted in our country. Given the proportion of patients with atypical profiles, it would be appropriate to minimise problems in clinical interpretation by conducting serological follow-up and additional testing.

🔖

Cite This Article

Behçet, M., Harre, A. Ç., Avcıoğlu, F., Soysal, E., Aybek, S., Çelik, H. B., Afşar, Y. (2026). Investigation of Epstein-Barr Virus Antibodies. Abant Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.47493/abantmedj.1787231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Damania B, Kenney SC, Raab-Traub N. Epstein-Barr virus: biology and clinical disease. Cell. 2022;185(20):3652-70.
  2. De Paschale M, Clerici P. Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: problems and solutions. World J Virol. 2012;1(1):31-43.
  3. Indari O, Ghosh S, Bal AS, et al. Awakening the sleeping giant: Epstein-Barr virus reactivation by biological agents. Pathog Dis. 2024;82:ftae002.
  4. Duran AÇ, Atik TK. Investigation of Epstein-Barr virus antibodies by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay method in patients of different age groups: evaluation of atypical serological profiles. Klimik Derg. 2021;34(2):103-8.
  5. Karadağ S, Sınırtaş M, Göral G. Epstein-Barr virus antikorlarının araştırılmasında kullanılan Paul-Bunnel testi ve immünblot yönteminin karşılaştırılması. Turk Mikrobiyol Cemiy Derg. 2010;40(2):117–24.
  6. Corrales I, Giménez E, Navarro D. Evaluation of the Architect Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG, VCA IgM, and EBV nuclear antigen 1 IgG chemiluminescent immunoassays for detection of EBV antibodies and categorization of EBV infection status using immunofluorescence assays as the reference method. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21(5):684-8.
  7. Yu H, Robertson ES. Epstein-Barr virus history and pathogenesis. Viruses. 2023;15(3):714.
  8. Fidan I, Yüksel S, Imir T. The investigation of Epstein-barr virus antibodies in different age groups. Turk J Infect. 2005;19(4):453-7.
  9. Winter JR, Jackson C, Lewis JE, Taylor GS, Thomas OG, Stagg HR. Predictors of Epstein-Barr virus serostatus and implications for vaccine policy: a systematic review of the literature. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1):010404. Available from: https://jogh.org/documents/issue202001/jogh-10-010404.pdf
  10. Solomay TV, Semenenko TA, Blokh AI. Prevalence of Epstein–Barr virus antibodies in different age groups in Europe and Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Care Russ Fed. 2021;65(3):276-86.
  11. Appak Ö, Gülmez A, Sayıner A. Architect® EBV antikor panel sonuçları ve EBV tanı algoritmalarının değerlendirilmesi. Turk Mikrobiyol Cemiy Derg. 2022;52(3):208-15.
  12. Yetkin G, Ay S, Tekerekoğlu MS, İşeri LA. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi hastanesine başvuran 1-18 yaş grubu çocuklarda Epstein-Barr virüs (EBV) seroprevalansı. Flora. 2008;13(2):79-82.
  13. Soylu M, Zeytinoğlu A, Altuğlu İ. Ege Üniversitesi hastanesi'ne başvuran hastalarda enzim işaretli floresan test ile elde edilen Epstein-Barr virüsü serolojik test sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. Ege Tip Derg. 2014;53(3):119-23.
  14. Varıcı Balcı FK, Özbek ÖA, Sayıner AA. Atypical profile problem in serological diagnosis of EBV. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2017;51(4):378-86.
  15. Abusalah MAH, Gan SH, Al-Hatamleh MA, Irekeola AA, Shueb RH, Yean Yean C. Recent advances in diagnostic approaches for Epstein–Barr virus. Pathogens. 2020;9(3):226.
  16. Hess RD. Routine Epstein-Barr virus diagnostics from the laboratory perspective: still challenging after 35 years. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(8):3381-7.
  17. De Paschale M, Cagnin D, Cerulli T, et al. Search for anti‐EA (D) antibodies in subjects with an “isolated VCA IgG” pattern. Int J Microbiol. 2010;2010:695104.
  18. Nystad TW, Myrmel H. Prevalence of primary versus reactivated Epstein-Barr virus infection in patients with VCA IgG-, VCA IgM- and EBNA-1-antibodies and suspected infectious mononucleosis. J Clin Virol. 2007;38(4):292-7.
  19. De Paschale M, Cagnin D, Manco MT, Clerici P. Significance of the “isolated EBNA-1 IgG” pattern in past EBV infection. Microbiol Med. 2009;24(1):50-2.