SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Infologica / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Predicting Industry Maturity Index Using Machine Learning Methods

Ayhan Doğan(Hacettepe University, Başkent Organized Industrial Zone, Technical Sciences Vocational School)0000-0002-9872-8889
Cihan Ünal(Hacettepe University, Başkent Organized Industrial Zone, Technical Sciences Vocational School)0000-0002-5255-4078
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings demonstrate that the proposed model predicts MI with high accuracy and offers a practical and scalable alternative for enterprises seeking to assess their Industry 4.0 readiness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Industry 4.0 has become a widely adopted concept in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Maturity and readiness models are commonly used to assess the current state of industrial organizations in relation to Industry 4.0.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings demonstrate that the proposed model predicts MI with high accuracy and offers a practical and scalable alternative for enterprises seeking to assess their Industry 4.0 readiness.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Machine learning · Industry 4.0 · Maturity model

Abstract

Industry 4.0 has become a widely adopted concept in recent years. Maturity and readiness models are commonly used to assess the current state of industrial organizations in relation to Industry 4.0. Companies’ maturity levels and index scores are typically determined through structured surveys. However, due to their complexity, time consumption, and high cost, many enterprises lack formally assessed maturity index (MI) scores. To address this limitation, this study initially employed survey data to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed machine learning (ML) framework. A 58-question survey was conducted to calculate the MI scores of the companies. These scores were then used as reference values to be predicted based on five easily accessible enterprise-level variables: company age, industry type, ownership structure, number of employees, and annual turnover. This approach tested whether MI could be accurately predicted without relying on lengthy survey processes, using only a minimal set of key enterprise attributes. The results of this study demonstrate that MI can be estimated successfully using ML techniques without the need for answering long and complex surveys. To reduce the burdens associated with conventional survey-based methods, this study employed multiple ML algorithms, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Linear Regression (LR), Regression Trees (RT), and Ensemble Tree-based models, and advanced boosting-based methods, such as extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM). The findings demonstrate that the proposed model predicts MI with high accuracy and offers a practical and scalable alternative for enterprises seeking to assess their Industry 4.0 readiness.

🔖

Cite This Article

Doğan, A., Ünal, C. (2025). Predicting Industry Maturity Index Using Machine Learning Methods. Acta Infologica, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1626593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (91)

  1. Akdil, K. Y., Ustundag, A., & Cevikcan, E. (2018). Maturity and readiness model for industry 4.0 strategy. Industry 40: Managing the digital transformation. Springer. pp 61-94 google scholar
  2. Angelopoulos, A., Michailidis, E. T., Nomikos, N., Trakadas, P., Hatziefremidis, A., Voliotis, S., & Zahariadis, T. (2019). Tackling faults in the industry 4.0 era—a survey of machine-learning solutions and key aspects. Sensors, 20, 109. google scholar
  3. Aslan, Y., Yavasca, S., & Yasar, C. (2011). Long-term electric peak load forecasting of Kutahya using different approaches. International Journal on Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering, 3, 87-91. google scholar
  4. Ateş, B. (2020). Gemi yapılarında gerilme yığılması öngörülerinin kaba ağ yapısı ve makine öğrenmesi ile gerçekleştirilmesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü google scholar
  5. Ayhan, S., & Erdoğmuş, Ş. (2014). Destek vektör makineleriyle sınıflandırma problemlerinin çözümü için çekirdek fonksiyonu seçimi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 9, 175-201. google scholar
  6. Basl, J., & Doucek, P. (2019). A metamodel for evaluating enterprise readiness in the context of Industry 4.0. Information, 10, 89. google scholar
  7. Bayazit, M., & Oğuz, B. (1994). Mühendisler için istatistik. Birsen Yayınevi, İstanbul, 197s. google scholar
  8. Becker, B. G., Klein, T., Wachinger, C., & Initiative AsDN (2018). Gaussian process uncertainty in age estimation as a measure of brain abnormality. NeuroImage, 175, 246-258. google scholar
  9. Bibby, L., & Dehe, B. (2018). Defining and assessing industry 4.0 maturity levels–case of the defense sector. Production Planning & Control, 29, 1030-1043. google scholar
  10. Boran, P. D. S. (2021). Makine öğrenmesi yöntemleri kullanılarak kısa dönem rüzgar gücü tahmini. Sakarya Üniversitesi google scholar
  11. Botha, A. P. (2018). Rapidly arriving futures: future readiness for Industry 4.0. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 29, 148-160. google scholar
  12. Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24, 123-140. google scholar
  13. Breiman, L. (2001). Using iterated bagging to debian regressions. Machine Learning, 45, 261-277. google scholar
  14. Brik, B., Bettayeb, B., Sahnoun, M. H., & Duval, F. (2019). Toward predicting system disruption in industry 4.0: Machine learning-based approach. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 667-674. google scholar
  15. Candanedo, I. S., Nieves, E. H., González, S. R., Martín, M. T. S., & Briones, A. G. (2018). Machine learning predictive model for industry 4.0. Knowledge Management in Organizations: 13th International Conference, KMO 2018, Žilina, Slovakia, August 6–10, 2018, Proceedings 13. Springer. pp 501-510 google scholar
  16. Canetta, L., Barni, A., & Montini, E. (2018). Development of a digitalization maturity model for the manufacturing sector. 2018 ieee international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC). IEEE. pp 1-7 google scholar
  17. Carvalho, N., Chaim, O., Cazarini, E., & Gerolamo, M. (2018). Manufacturing in the fourth industrial revolution: A positive prospect in sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 671-678. google scholar
  18. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 google scholar
  19. Chonsawat, N., & Sopadang, A. (2020). Defining SMEs’ 4.0 readiness indicators. Applied Sciences, 10, 8998. google scholar
  20. Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297. google scholar
  21. Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, google scholar
  22. Çınar, Z. M., Zeeshan, Q., & Korhan, O. (2021). A framework for industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of smart manufacturing enterprises: a case study. Sustainability, 13, 6659. google scholar
  23. Da Silva, V. L., Kovaleski, J. L., Pagani, R. N., Silva, J. D. M., & Corsi, A. (2020). Implementation of Industry 4.0 concept in companies: Empirical evidence. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 33, 325-342. google scholar
  24. Doğan, A. (2024). Prediction of major earthquakes that may affect İzmir using machine learning methods. Yerbilimleri, 45, 93-106. doi:10.17824/yerbilimleri.1402618 google scholar
  25. Doğan, A., Korkmaz, M., & Kirmaci, V. (2023). Estimation of Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube performance using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Refrigeration, 150, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2023.01.021 google scholar
  26. Erol, S., Schumacher, A., & Sihn, W. (2016). Strategic guidance toward Industry 4.0–a three-stage process model. International conference on competitive manufacturing. pp 495-501 google scholar
  27. Finance, A. (2015). Industry 4.0 Challenges and solutions for the digital transformation and use of exponential technologies. Finance, audit tax consulting corporate: Zurich, Swiss:1-12. google scholar
  28. Geissbauer, R., Vedso, J., & Schrauf, S. (2016). Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise. google scholar
  29. Gerlitz, L. (2016). Design management as a domain of smart and sustainable enterprise: Business modeling for innovation and smart growth in Industry 4.0. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 3, 244. google scholar
  30. Gökalp, E., Şener, U., & Eren, P. E. (2017). Development of an assessment model for industry 4.0: industry 4.0-MM. International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. Springer. pp 128-142 google scholar
  31. Haber, R. E., Juanes, C., del Toro, R., & Beruvides, G. (2015). Artificial cognitive control with self-x capabilities: A case study of a micromanufacturing process. Computers in Industry, 74, 135-150. google scholar
  32. Hamidi, S. R., Aziz, A. A., Shuhidan, S. M., Aziz, A. A., & Mokhsin, M. (2018). SMEs maturity model assessment of IR4. 0 digital transformation. google scholar
  33. International Conference on Kansei Engineering & Emotion Research. Springer. pp 721-732 google scholar Haykin, S. (1999). Neural networks: A guided tour. Soft computing and intelligent systems: theory and applications 71. google scholar
  34. Hearst, M. A., Dumais, S. T., Osuna, E., Platt, J., & Scholkopf, B. (1998). Support vector machines. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 13, 18-28. google scholar
  35. Heo, Y., & Zavala, V. M. (2012). Gaussian process modeling for measurement and verification of building energy savings. Energy and Buildings, 53, 7-18. google scholar
  36. Hizam-Hanafiah, M., Soomro, M. A., & Abdullah, N. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 readiness models: a systematic literature review of model dimensions. Information, 11, 364. google scholar
  37. Horvat, D., Stahlecker, T., Zenker, A., Lerch, C., & Mladineo, M. (2018). A conceptual approach to analyzing manufacturing companies’ profiles concerning Industry 4.0 in emerging economies. Procedia Manufacturing, 17, 419-426. google scholar
  38. Horváth, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2019). Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small- and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 119-132. google scholar
  39. Huang, S., Cai, N., Pacheco, P. P., Narrandes, S., Wang, Y., & Xu, W. (2018). Applications of support vector machine (SVM) learning in cancer genomics. Cancer Genomics & Proteomics, 15, 41-51. google scholar
  40. Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 829-846. google scholar
  41. Jalil, N. A., Hwang, H. J., & Dawi, N. M. (2019). Machines learning trends, perspectives and prospects in education sector. Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology, 201-205. google scholar
  42. Jesus, C. D., & Lima, R. M. (2020). Literature search of key factors for developing generic and specific maturity models for Industry 4.0. Applied Sciences, 10, 5825. google scholar
  43. Kalayci, T. E. (2018) Kimlik hırsızı web sitelerinin sınıflandırılması için makine öğrenmesi yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 24, 870-878. google scholar
  44. Kannan, S. M., Suri, K., Cadavid, J., Barosan, I., Van Den Brand, M., Alferez, M., & Gerard, S. (2017). Toward industry 4.0: Gap analysis between current automotive MES and industry standards using model-based requirement engineering. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Workshops (ICSAW). IEEE. pp 29-35 google scholar
  45. Katuwal, G. J., Baum, S. A., & Michael, A. M. (2018). Early brain imaging can predict autism: Application of machine learning to a clinical imaging archive. BioRxiv:471169. google scholar
  46. Kavzoğlu, T., & Çölkesen, İ. (2010). Destek vektör makineleri ile uydu görüntülerinin sınıflandırılmasında kernel fonksiyonlarının etkilerinin incelenmesi. Harita Dergisi, 144, 73-82. google scholar
  47. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T. Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. google scholar
  48. Kuo, C. J., Ting, K. C., Chen, Y. C., Yang, D. L., & Chen, H. M. (2017). Automatic machine status prediction in the era of Industry 4.0: Case study of machines in a spring factory. Journal of Systems Architecture, 81, 44-53. google scholar
  49. Lee, C., & Lim, C. (2021). From technological development to social advance: A review of Industry 4.0 through machine learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120653. google scholar
  50. Leyh, C., Bley, K., Schäffer, T., & Forstenhäusler, S. (2016). SIMMI 4.0-a maturity model for classifying the enterprise-wide it and software landscape focusing on Industry 4.0. 2016 federated conference on computer science and information systems (fedcsis). IEEE. pp 1297-1302 google scholar
  51. Liu, K., Hu, X., Wei, Z., Li, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Modified Gaussian process regression models for cyclic capacity prediction of lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 5, 1225-1236. google scholar
  52. Luu, Q. H., Lau, M. F., Ng, S. P., & Chen, T. Y. (2021). Testing multiple linear regression systems with metamorphic testing. Journal of Systems and Software, 182, 111062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111062 google scholar
  53. Maimon, O., & Rokach, L. (2005). Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. google scholar
  54. Manavalan, E., & Jayakrishna, K. (2019). A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 127, 925-953. google scholar
  55. Mehmet, A., & Doğansoy, G. A. (2022). Makine öğrenmesi ve derin öğrenme yöntemleri kullanılarak e-perakende sektörüne yönelik talep tahmini. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 37, 1325-1340. google scholar
  56. Memnun, D., & Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım. İlköğretim Online 12. google scholar
  57. Mendeş, M., & Akkartal, E. (2009). Regression tree analysis for predicting slaughter weight in broilers. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8, 615-624. google scholar
  58. Methavitakul, B., & Santiteerakul, S. (2018). Analysis of key dimension and sub-dimension for Supply Chian of Industry to fourth Industry Performance Measurement. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI). IEEE. pp 191-195 google scholar
  59. Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2018). A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 49, 194-214. google scholar
  60. Muñoz, L. P., Hagemann, M., Palandella, L., & Cagliari, P. (2023). Maturity SCAN 4.0: An analysis and discussion of results from scanning of digital capabilities adopted by Argentinian CPG companies. ESSN: 2701-6277, 854-863. google scholar
  61. Müller, J. M., Voigt, K. I. (2018). The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chains in engineer-to-order industries-an exploratory case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51, 122-127. google scholar
  62. Opitz, D., & Maclin, R. (1999). Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11, 169-198. google scholar
  63. Özen, N. S., Saraç, S., & Koyuncu, M. (2021). COVID-19 Vakalarının Makine Öğrenmesi Algoritmaları ile Tahmini: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Örneği. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 134-139. google scholar
  64. Pessl, E., Sorko, S. R., & Mayer, B. (2017). Roadmap Industry 4.0–implementation guideline for enterprises. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 5, 193-202. google scholar
  65. Rahamaddulla, S. R. B., Leman, Z., Baharudin, B. H. T. B., & Ahmad, S. A. (2021). Conceptualizing smart manufacturing readiness-maturity model for small and medium enterprise (sme) in malaysia. Sustainability, 13, 9793. google scholar
  66. Rai, R., Tiwari, M. K., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). Machine learning in manufacturing and industry 4.0 applications. Taylor and Francis. pp 4773-4778. google scholar
  67. Rais, R. B. (2021). Sharing the Pie The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sharing/Platform Economy: Distributive justice implications. Beyond Free Market. Routledge. pp 125-140 google scholar
  68. Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning, vol. 1. MIT press Cambridge MA. google scholar
  69. Rauch, E., Dallasega, P., & Unterhofer, M. (2019). Requirements and barriers for introducing smart manufacturing in small- and mediumsized enterprises. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47, 87-94. google scholar
  70. Rong, S., & Bao-Wen, Z. (2018). The research of regression model in machine learning field. MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. 01033, 2019. google scholar
  71. Saad, S. M., Bahadori, R., & Jafarnejad, H. (2021). The smart SME technology readiness assessment methodology in the context of industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. google scholar
  72. Sajjad, A., Ahmad, W., Hussain, S., Chuddher, B. A., Sajid, M., Jahanjaib, M., Ali, M. K., & Jawad, M. (2024). Assessment by Lean Modified Manufacturing Maturity Model for Industry 4.0: A Case Study of Pakistan's Manufacturing Sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 6420-6434. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3259005 google scholar
  73. Schaupp, E., Abele, E., & Metternich, J. (2017). Potentials of digitalization in tool management. Procedia CIRP, 63, 144-149. google scholar
  74. Schiltz, F., Masci, C., Agasisti, T., & Horn, D. (2018). Using regression tree ensembles to model interaction effects: a graphical approach. Applied Economics, 50, 6341-6354. google scholar
  75. Schölkopf, B., Williamson, R. C., Smola, A., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Platt, J. (1999). Support vector method for novelty detection. Advances in neural information processing systems 12. google scholar
  76. Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 52, 161-166. google scholar
  77. Shoaran, M., Haghi, B. A., Taghavi, M., Farivar, M., & Emami-Neyestanak, A. (2018). Energy-efficient classification for resource-constrained biomedical applications. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, 8, 693-707. google scholar
  78. Skalli, D., Charkaoui, A., & Cherrafi, A. (2023). Design of Industry 4.0 Maturity Model and Readiness Assessment Under the Digital Transformation Toward the Implementation of LSS4.0. In T. Masrour, I. El Hassani, and N. Barka, Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Applications Cham. google scholar
  79. Soman, K., Loganathan, R., & Ajay, V. (2009). Machine learning with SVM and other kernel methods. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. google scholar
  80. Stentoft, J., Adsbøll Wickstrøm, K., Philipsen, K., & Haug, A. (2021). Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Production Planning & Control, 32, 811-828. google scholar
  81. Temel, G. O. (2004). Sınıflama ve Regresyon Ağaçları. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bioistatistik Anabilim Dalı, Mersin 11:23-24. google scholar
  82. Tolun, S. (2008). Destek vektör makineleri: Banka başarısızlığının tahmini üzerine bir uygulama. İktisadî Araştırmalar Vakfı google scholar
  83. Ünal, C., Sungur, C., & Yildirim, H. (2022). Application of the maturity model in industrial corporations. Sustainability, 14, 9478. google scholar
  84. Valentin, B. A. (2017). Methods Of Assessment And Training Of A Company Toward The Enterprise 4.0. Annals of DAAAM & Proceedings 28. google scholar
  85. Városiné Demeter, K., Losonci, D., Szász, L., & Rácz, B. G. (2018). Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness: a multi-country industry level analysis. google scholar
  86. Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 411-417. google scholar
  87. Wank, A., Adolph, S., Anokhin, O., Arndt, A., Anderl, R., & Metternich, J. (2016). Using a learning factory approach to transfer Industrie 4.0 approaches to small-and medium-sized enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 54, 89-94. google scholar
  88. Wei, J., Chu, X., Sun, X. Y., Xu, K., Deng, H. X., Chen, J., Wei, Z., & Lei, M. (2019). Machine learning in materials science. InfoMat, 1, 338-358. google scholar
  89. Yesiloglu-Gultekin, N., & Dogan, A. (2024). Estimation of the elastic modulus of basaltic rocks using machine learning methods. Earth Science Informatics, doi:10.1007/s12145-024-01472-7 google scholar
  90. Yücel, Y. B. (2017). Yaşam memnuniyetini etkileyen faktörlerin sınıflama ve regresyon ağacı ile belirlenmesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. google scholar
  91. Zhou, G., Zhang, J., Su, J., Shen, D., & Tan, C. (2004). Recognizing names in biomedical texts: a machine learning approach. Bioinformatics, 20, 1178-1190. google scholar