SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Infologica / 2025 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Meteorological and Temporal Dynamics in Urban Traffic Density: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Neural Network Models

Busra Ozdenizci Kose(GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8414-5252
Farid Huseynov(GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9936-0596
Vildan Gülpınar Demirci(AKSARAY UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8824-5154
Nurullah Taş(GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6221-0204
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future research can build on these findings by expanding the scope of the dataset and incorporating dynamic interactions to further improve prediction accuracy and applicability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Understanding the interplay between meteorological and temporal factors and urban traffic density is vital for effective traffic management and sustainable urban planning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Performance evaluation based on MSE, MAE, RMSE, and R² Scores highlighted the superiority of LightGBM and Random Forest, which achieved the highest accuracy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future research can build on these findings by expanding the scope of the dataset and incorporating dynamic interactions to further improve prediction accuracy and applicability.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Urban Traffic Density · Meteorological Factors · Temporal Patterns

Abstract

Understanding the interplay between meteorological and temporal factors and urban traffic density is vital for effective traffic management and sustainable urban planning. This study explores these dynamics using a dataset from Istanbul, integrating traffic metrics with weather variables as temperature, dew point, wind speed, and precipitation, alongside temporal indicators, such as time of day and weekday/weekend distinctions. A multi-model approach that combines traditional regression techniques, advanced ensemble models, and neural networks was applied. Ridge and Lasso Regression provided baseline comparisons, whereas Decision Tree, KNN Regression, and Random Forest captured nonlinear relationships. Advanced ensemble models, such as LightGBM and XGBoost, employ boosting techniques to enhance accuracy. A feedforward neural network complementing ensemble methods further analyzed intricate data patterns. Performance evaluation based on MSE, MAE, RMSE, and R² Scores highlighted the superiority of LightGBM and Random Forest, which achieved the highest accuracy. Feature importance analysis revealed traffic-specific metrics, such as average speed, as the most significant predictors, followed by meteorological variables, such as temperature and pressure. Temporal factors, including morning and working hours, also played a crucial role in shaping traffic density. The results confirm the significant influence of weather and temporal variables on traffic density and validate the effectiveness of advanced ensemble models and neural networks in predictive traffic modeling. By focusing on Istanbul, this study highlights the value of region-specific approaches and provides a foundation for developing data-driven traffic management strategies. Future research can build on these findings by expanding the scope of the dataset and incorporating dynamic interactions to further improve prediction accuracy and applicability.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kose, B. O., Huseynov, F., Demirci, V. G., Taş, N. (2025). Meteorological and Temporal Dynamics in Urban Traffic Density: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Neural Network Models. Acta Infologica, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1627153

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Abduljabbar, R., Dia, H., & Liyanage, S. (2024). Machine Learning Models for Traffic Prediction on Arterial Roads Using Traffic Features and Weather Information. Applied Sciences, 14(23), 11047. google scholar
  2. Akın, M., Sağıroğlu, Ş., & Değirmenci, A. (2019, November). Traffic flow forecasting model with density based clustering algorithm. In 2019 1st International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (UBMYK) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. google scholar
  3. Aydın, S., Taşyürek, M., & Öztürk, C. (2021). Traffic density estimation using machine learning methods. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, 1(2), 136–143. google scholar
  4. Bao, X., Jiang, D., Yang, X., & Wang, H. (2021). An improved deep belief network for traffic prediction considering weather factors. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60(1), 413-420. google scholar
  5. Bentéjac, C., Csörgő, A., & Martínez-Muñoz, G. (2021). A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54, 1937-1967. google scholar
  6. Bi, H., Ye, Z., & Zhu, H. (2022). Data-driven analysis of weather impacts on urban traffic conditions at the city level. Urban Climate, 41, 101065. google scholar
  7. Borchers, T., Wittowsky, D., & Fernandes, R. A. S. (2024). A Comprehensive Survey and Future Directions on Optimizing Sustainable Urban Mobility. IEEE Access. google scholar
  8. Braz, F. J., Ferreira, J., Gonçalves, F., Weege, K., Almeida, J., Baldo, F., & Gonçalves, P. (2022). Road traffic forecast based on meteorological information through deep learning methods. Sensors, 22(12), 4485. google scholar
  9. Ceder, A. (2021). Urban mobility and public transport: future perspectives and review. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 25(4), 455-479. google scholar
  10. Cetin Tas, I., & Mungen, A. A. (2021). Prediction of Regional Traffic Intensity with Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(15), 378-390. google scholar
  11. Cools, M., Moons, E., & Wets, G. (2010). Assessing the impact of weather on traffic intensity. Weather, Climate, and Society, 2(1), 60-68. google scholar
  12. Dong, X., Yu, Z., Cao, W., Shi, Y., & Ma, Q. (2020). A survey on ensemble learning. Frontiers of Computer Science, 14, 241-258. google scholar
  13. Gao, Y., & Zhu, J. (2022). Characteristics, Impacts and trends of urban transportation. Encyclopedia, 2(2), 1168-1182. google scholar
  14. Gerges, F., Llaguno-Munitxa, M., Zondlo, M. A., Boufadel, M. C., & Bou-Zeid, E. (2024). Weather and the City: Machine Learning for Predicting and Attributing Fine Scale Air Quality to Meteorological and Urban Determinants. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(14), 6313-6325. google scholar
  15. Keay, K., & Simmonds, I. (2005). The association of rainfall and other weather variables with road traffic volume in Melbourne, Australia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(1), 109-124. google scholar
  16. Kendre, H., Karmarkar, M., Karadbhajne, H., Kamtalwar, N., & Marathe, A. (2024, February). Traffic Volume Prediction Based on Weather Parameters. In 2024 IEEE International Conference for Women in Innovation, Technology & Entrepreneurship (ICWITE) (pp. 124-129). IEEE. google scholar
  17. Khan, A. F., & Ivan, P. (2023). Integrating Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Smart Cities for Enhanced Traffic Congestion Management: An Empirical Review. Journal of Urban Development and Management, 2(4), 211-221. google scholar
  18. Lin, P., He, Y., Pei, M., & Yang, R. (2022). Data-driven spatial-temporal analysis of highway traffic volume considering weather and festival impacts. Travel Behavior and Society, 29, 95-112. google scholar
  19. Lin, P., Hong, Y., He, Y., & Pei, M. (2024). Advancing and lagging effects of weather conditions on intercity traffic volume: A geographically weighted regression analysis in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 13, 58-76. google scholar
  20. Lin, Y. C., Lin, Y. T., Chen, C. R., & Lai, C. Y. (2025). Meteorological and traffic effects on air pollutants using Bayesian networks and deep learning. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 152, 54-70. google scholar
  21. Liu, Z. L. (2025). Ensemble learning. In Artificial Intelligence for Engineers: Basics and Implementations (pp. 221-242). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. google scholar
  22. Medina-Salgado, B., Sánchez-DelaCruz, E., Pozos-Parra, P., & Sierra, J. E. (2022). Urban traffic flow prediction techniques: A review. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 35, 100739. google scholar
  23. Mienye, I. D., & Sun, Y. (2022). A survey of ensemble learning: Concepts, algorithms, applications, and prospects. IEEE Access, 10, 99129-99149. google scholar
  24. Qi, X., Mei, G., Tu, J., Xi, N., & Piccialli, F. (2022). A deep learning approach for long-term traffic flow prediction with multifactor fusion using spatiotemporal graph convolutional network. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(8), 8687-8700. google scholar
  25. Shaygan, M., Meese, C., Li, W., Zhao, X. G., & Nejad, M. (2022). Traffic prediction using artificial intelligence: Review of recent advances and emerging opportunities. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 145, 103921. google scholar
  26. Tao, X., Cheng, L., Zhang, R., Chan, W. K., Chao, H., & Qin, J. (2023). Towards Green Innovation in Smart Cities: Leveraging Traffic Flow Prediction with Machine Learning Algorithms for Sustainable Transportation Systems. Sustainability, 16 (1), 251. google scholar
  27. Theofilatos, A., & Yannis, G. (2014). A review of the effect of traffic and weather characteristics on road safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 72, 244-256. google scholar
  28. Utku, A. (2023). Deep Learning Based an Efficient Hybrid Model for Urban Traffic Prediction. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 16(2), 107-117. google scholar
  29. Wang, S., Cao, J., & Philip, S. Y. (2020). Deep learning for spatio-temporal data mining: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34(8), 3681-3700. google scholar
  30. Wu, J., & Zhang, C. (2024). The role of temperature and rainfall in traffic congestion: Evidence from 98 Chinese cities. Weather, Climate, and Society. google scholar
  31. Xie, P., Li, T., Liu, J., Du, S., Yang, X., & Zhang, J. (2020). Urban flow prediction from spatiotemporal data using machine learning: A survey. Information Fusion, 59, 1-12. google scholar
  32. Yin, X., Wu, G., Wei, J., Shen, Y., Qi, H., & Yin, B. (2022). Deep learning on traffic prediction: Methods, analysis, and future directions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(6), 4927-4943. google scholar
  33. Zhang, W., Pan, W., Zhu, X., Yang, C., Du, J., & Yin, J. (2024). Identification of Traffic Flow Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Their Associated Weather Factors: A Case Study in the Terminal Airspace of Hong Kong. Aerospace, 11(7), 531. google scholar