SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Infologica / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification

Muhammed Fatih Pekşen(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-2470-6409
Hüseyin Serdar Geçer(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES)0000-0003-0531-8539
Beytullah Eren(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6747-7004
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the results suggest that nonlinear, kernel-based classifiers outperform linear methods for forest fire severity classification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Forest fires are among the most destructive natural disasters, causing substantial ecological, economic, and human losses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accurate assessment of fire severity is crucial for preparedness, rapid response, and efficient resource management.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the results suggest that nonlinear, kernel-based classifiers outperform linear methods for forest fire severity classification.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010–2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Forest Fire Severity · Forest Fire Classification · Linear Discriminant Analysis

Abstract

Forest fires are among the most destructive natural disasters, causing substantial ecological, economic, and human losses. Accurate assessment of fire severity is crucial for preparedness, rapid response, and efficient resource management. This study evaluates three supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms—Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Kernel Naive Bayes (KNB), and Fine Gaussian Support Vector Machine (Fine Gaussian SVM)—to classify forest fire severity using a real-world dataset from Türkiye. The dataset includes over 15,000 fire incidents (2010–2024) and 36 initial features. To improve predictive performance and reduce dimensionality, feature selection was performed using the Chi-square test. Fire severity was reclassified into three levels (low, moderate, high) based on burned area (hectares). Models were trained and validated with 10-fold cross-validation. KNB achieved the highest accuracy (82%), followed by Fine Gaussian SVM (79%) and LDA (65%). The advantage of KNB likely stems from its ability to capture nonlinear class boundaries and probabilistic structures typical of complex environmental data. Overall, the results suggest that nonlinear, kernel-based classifiers outperform linear methods for forest fire severity classification. The proposed national-scale, interpretable framework can support policymakers and disaster-management authorities in developing intelligent early warning systems and optimizing suppression resource allocation in high-risk areas.

🔖

Cite This Article

Pekşen, M. F., Geçer, H. S., Eren, B. (2026). Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification. Acta Infologica, Volume: 10 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1756825

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (66)

  1. Abhilash, P. M., & Chakradhar, D. (2021). Sustainability improvement of WEDM process by analysing and classifying wire rupture using kernel-based Naive Bayes classifier. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 43(64), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02805-z google scholar
  2. Acar, Z., & Gonencgil, B. (2023). Forest fires in southern Turkey July-August 2021. Revista de Climatología, 23, 46-57. https://doi.org/10.59427/rcli/2023/v23.46-57 google scholar
  3. Afuwape, A. A., Xu, Y., Anajemba, J. H., & Srivastava, G. (2021). Performance evaluation of secured network traffic classification using a machine learning approach. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 78, 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2021.103545 google scholar
  4. Albaba, A., Simões-Capela, N., Wang, Y., Hendriks, R. C., De Raedt, W., & Van Hoof, C. (2021). Assessing the signal quality of electrocardiograms from varied acquisition sources: A generic machine learning pipeline for model generation. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 130, 104164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104164 google scholar
  5. Amatulli, G., Peréz-Cabello, F., & de la Riva, J. (2013). Mapping lightning/human-caused wildfires occurrence under ignition point location uncertainty. Ecological Modelling, 265, 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.08.001 google scholar
  6. Anand, A., Saxena, A., & Singh, K. (2024). Statistical features based content-based image retrieval using machine learning classifiers. In 2024 IEEE 3rd World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC) (pp. 1102-1109). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIC61668.2024.10731120 google scholar
  7. Barati Jozan, M. M., Khosravi, H., Lotfata, A., Cios, K. J., & Tabesh, H. (2025). Predicting firefighter injury and entrapment in urban firefighting operations: An investigation into the effectiveness of modified fire time stages and machine learning. Health Science Reports, 8(3), e70327. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70327 google scholar
  8. Bayat, G., & Yıldız, K. (2022). Comparison of the machine learning methods to predict wildfire areas. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, 17(2), 241-250. google scholar
  9. Benouareth, A. (2021). An efficient face recognition approach combining likelihood-based sufficient dimension reduction and LDA. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(1), 1457-1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09527-9 google scholar
  10. Bertolini, R., Finch, S. J., & Nehm, R. H. (2021). Enhancing data pipelines for forecasting student performance: Integrating feature selection with cross-validation. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00279-6 google scholar
  11. Bhati, B. S., & Rai, C. S. (2020). Analysis of support vector machine-based intrusion detection techniques. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(4), 2371-2383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03970-z google scholar
  12. Chung, J., & Lee, K. (2023). Credit card fraud detection: An improved strategy for high recall using KNN, LDA, and linear regression. Sensors, 23(18), 7788. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23187788 google scholar
  13. Da Silva, F. P., Matos, R. S., da Fonseca Filho, H. D., da Silva, M. R., Ţălu, Ş., dos Santos, Y. T., … & Martins, C. O. (2023). Non-destructive ultrasonic testing and machine learning-assisted early detection of carburizing damage in HP steel pyrolysis furnace tubes. Measurement, 218, 113221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113221 google scholar
  14. Eberle, C., & Higuera Boa, O. (2022). Mediterranean wildfires (Technical Report). United Nations University, UNU-ENS. https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/interconnectedrisks/reports/2022/Case-studies/TR_220808_MediterraneanWildfires.pdf google scholar
  15. Egwom, O. J., Hassan, M., Tanimu, J. J., Hamada, M., & Ogar, O. M. (2022). An LDA-SVM machine learning model for breast cancer classification. BioMedInformatics, 2(3), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics2030022 google scholar
  16. Elkari, B., Chaibi, Y., & Kousksou, T. (2024). Random forest with feature selection and K-Fold cross validation for predicting the electrical and thermal efficiencies of air based photovoltaic-thermal systems. Energy Reports, 12, 988-999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.07.002 google scholar
  17. Farhaoui, Y., Herawan, T., Imoize, A. L., & El Allaoui, A. (2025). Intersection of artificial intelligence, data science, and cutting-edge technologies: From concepts to applications in smart environment (ICAISE'2024 proceedings). Springer. https://books.google.com/books?id=WdxhEQAAQBAJ google scholar
  18. Ganteaume, A., & Jappiot, M. (2022). Fire regimes in Mediterranean landscapes of southern Europe. Ambio, 51(3), 635-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01650-2 google scholar
  19. Gan, J., & Qi, Y. (2021). Selection of the optimal number of topics for LDA topic model-Taking patent policy analysis as an example. Entropy, 23(10), 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23101301 google scholar
  20. Haji Zahari, M. I. H. B. P., Karri, R. R., Isa, M. H., Zahran, E. S. M. M., & Nagendra, S. S. (2023). Soft computing techniques for prediction of forest fire occurrence in Brunei Darussalam. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2643(1), 030023. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0110349 google scholar
  21. He, Y., Ou, G., Fournier-Viger, P., & Huang, J. Z. (2025). Attribute grouping-based Naive Bayesian classifier. Science China Information Sciences, 68(3), 132106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-022-3728-2 google scholar
  22. Heinselman, M. L. (1981). Fire intensity and frequency as factors in the distribution and structure of northern ecosystems. In H. A. Mooney, T. M. Bonnicksen, N. L. Christensen, J. E. Lotan, & W. A. Reiners (Eds.), Fire regimes and ecosystem properties (pp. 7-57). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. (General Technical Report WO-26). https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/22826 google scholar
  23. Iban, M. C., & Sekertekin, A. (2022). Machine learning-based wildfire susceptibility mapping using remotely sensed fire data and GIS: A case study of Adana and Mersin provinces, Turkey. Ecological Informatics, 69, 101647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101647 google scholar
  24. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ google scholar
  25. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf google scholar
  26. Jana, D. K., Bhunia, P., Adhikary, S. D., & Mishra, A. (2023). Analyzing of salient features and classification of wine type based on quality through various neural network and support vector machine classifiers. Results in Control and Optimization, 11, 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2023.100219 google scholar
  27. Komadina, A., Kovačević, I., Štengl, B., & Groš, S. (2023). Detecting anomalies in firewall logs using artificially generated attacks. In 2023 17th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ConTEL58387.2023.10198912 google scholar
  28. Lai, C., Zeng, S., Guo, W., Liu, X., Li, Y., & Liao, B. (2022). Forest fire prediction with imbalanced data using a deep neural network method. Forests, 13(7), 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071129 google scholar
  29. Lin, S. L. (2021). Application of machine learning to a medium Gaussian support vector machine in the diagnosis of motor bearing faults. Electronics, 10(18), 2266. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10182266 google scholar
  30. Lopez-Bernal, D., Balderas, D., Ponce, P., & Molina, A. (2021). Education 4.0: Teaching the basics of KNN, LDA and simple perceptron algorithms for binary classification problems. Future Internet, 13(8), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13080193 google scholar
  31. Madadikhaljan, M., & Schmitt, M. (2024). Thermal infrared image georeferencing using an ensemble of land cover predictions. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, X-3-2024, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-3-2024-223-2024 google scholar
  32. Malik, M. M., Fayyaz, A. M., Yasmin, M., Abdulkadir, S. J., Al-Selwi, S. M., Raza, M., & Waheed, S. (2024). A novel deep CNN model with entropy coded sine cosine for corn disease classification. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 36(7), 102126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102126 google scholar
  33. Martínez, A., Chuvieco, E., & Riaño, D. (2019). Evaluation of seasonal and long-term trends in fire danger conditions in Spain using the Canadian Fire Weather Index. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 279, 107769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107769 google scholar
  34. Miao, J., & Zhu, W. (2022). Precision-Recall Curve (PRC) classification trees. Evolutionary Intelligence, 15(3), 1545-1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00565-2 google scholar
  35. Mousavi, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021). Wood hole-damage detection and classification via contact ultrasonic testing. Construction and Building Materials, 307, 124999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124999 google scholar
  36. Mousavi, M., Taskhiri, M. S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023). Standing tree health assessment using contact-ultrasonic testing and machine learning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 209, 107816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107816 google scholar
  37. Montesinos López, O. A., Montesinos López, A., & Crossa, J. (2022). Overfitting, model tuning, and evaluation of prediction performance. In Multivariate statistical machine learning methods for genomic prediction (pp. 109-139). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89010-0 google scholar
  38. Moreira, F., Leal, M., Bergonse, R., Canadas, M. J., Novais, A., Oliveira, S., Ribeiro, P. F., Zêzere, J. L., & Santos, J. L. (2023). Recent trends in fire regimes and associated territorial features in a fire-prone Mediterranean region. Fire, 6(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6020060 google scholar
  39. Nagy, A., Szabó, A., Elbeltagi, A., Nxumalo, G. S., Bódi, E. B., & Tamás, J. (2024). Hyperspectral indices data fusion-based machine learning enhanced by MRMR algorithm for estimating maize chlorophyll content. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1419316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1419316 google scholar
  40. Naidu, G., Zuva, T., & Sibanda, E. M. (2023). A review of evaluation metrics in machine learning algorithms. In R. Silhavy & P. Silhavy (Eds.), Artificial intelligence application in networks and systems (Vol. 724, pp. 17-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35314-7_2 google scholar
  41. Najib, M. K., & Nurdiati, S. (2025). Systematic literature review on the application of mathematics, statistics, and computer science in wildfire analysis. Euler: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi, 13(1), 34-49. https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/Euler/article/view/31000 google scholar
  42. OGM (Orman Genel Müdürlüğü). (2025). Resmi istatistikler: Ormancılık istatistikleri [Veri setleri ve raporlar]. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/tr/e-kutuphane/resmi-istatistikler google scholar
  43. Park, M., Jeon, Y., Bak, J., & Park, S. (2022). Forest-fire response system using deep-learning-based approaches with CCTV images and weather data. IEEE Access, 10, 66061-66071. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3184707 google scholar
  44. Peker, N., & Kubat, C. (2021). Application of Chi-square discretization algorithms to ensemble classification methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 185, 115540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115540 google scholar
  45. Pekşen, M. F., Yurtsever, U., & Uyaroğlu, Y. (2024). Enhancing electrical panel anomaly detection for predictive maintenance with machine learning and IoT. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 96, 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.03.106 google scholar
  46. Pillai, L. G., & Mubarak, D. M. N. (2023). Malayalam language vowel classification using support vector machine for children. Sādhanā, 48(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02109-z google scholar
  47. Porta, H., Kamoun, I., & Tuia, D. (2025, April). Interpretable by-design wildfire forecasting via prototypes. In European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2025 (EGU25). https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU25/EGU25-15783.html google scholar
  48. Radke, D., Hessler, A., & Ellsworth, D. (2019). Operational challenges in wildfire detection: Evaluating the viability of satellite-based monitoring systems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 231, 111238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111238 google scholar
  49. Risk, C., & James, P. M. A. (2022). Optimal cross-validation strategies for selection of spatial interpolation models for the Canadian forest fire weather index system. Earth and Space Science, 9(2), e2021EA002019. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002019 google scholar
  50. Rizzi, G. M. (2024). Deep learning for onboard real-time cloud segmentation in satellite images (Master's thesis, Politecnico di Torino). https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/33108/ google scholar
  51. Sharma, S., & Guleria, K. (2023). A deep learning based model for the detection of pneumonia from chest X-ray images using VGG-16 and neural networks. Procedia Computer Science, 218, 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.018 google scholar
  52. Singh, G., Pal, Y., & Dahiya, A. K. (2023). Classification of power quality disturbances using linear discriminant analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 138, 110181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110181 google scholar
  53. Singh, S., Vazirani, V., Singhania, S., & Suroth, V. S. (2024). Beyond boundaries: Unifying classification and segmentation in wildfire detection systems. Multimedia Tools and Applications. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19888-0 google scholar
  54. Sjöström, J., & Granström, A. (2023). Human activity and demographics drive the fire regime in a highly developed European boreal region. Fire Safety Journal, 136, 103743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.103743 google scholar
  55. Thodati, A., Zacharia, Z., Zhou, C., et al. (2024, December). Integrating machine learning and citizen science in CS-FLARE for real-time wildfire risk assessment. In AGU Fall Meeting 2024. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AGUFMED41C2539T/abstract google scholar
  56. TOD (Türkiye Ormancılar Derneği). (2025). Orman & yangın: İstatistikler, yayınlar ve raporlar. https://www.ormancilardernegi.org/Yangin google scholar
  57. TSMS (Turkish State Meteorological Service). (2021). Monthly climate bulletin – July and August 2021. Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. https://www.mgm.gov.tr google scholar
  58. Turco, M., Rosa-Cánovas, J. J., Bedia, J., Jerez, S., Montávez, J. P., Llasat, M. C., & Provenzale, A. (2018). Exacerbated fires in Mediterranean Europe due to anthropogenic warming projected with non-stationary climate-fire models. Nature Communications, 9, Article 3821. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06358-z google scholar
  59. Tymstra, C., Jain, P., Flannigan, M. D., & Wotton, B. M. (2020). Wildfire management in Canada: Review, challenges, and opportunities. Progress in Disaster Science, 5, 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100045 google scholar
  60. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. (2025). Wildfire classification standards [Policy memorandum]. USDA Forest Service. https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/fire/wildfire-classifications google scholar
  61. Urrea, C., & Domínguez, C. (2024). Fault diagnosis in a four-arm delta robot based on wavelet scattering networks and artificial intelligence techniques. Technologies, 12(11), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12110225 google scholar
  62. Varoquaux, G., & Colliot, O. (2023). Evaluating machine learning models and their diagnostic value. In Machine learning for brain disorders (pp. 601-630). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3195-9 google scholar
  63. Yadav, S. K., Tiwari, P. K., Tripathi, A., Sharma, U. K., Dixit, P., Dutt, A., … & Shukla, N. K. (2023). Comparative analysis of signal processing techniques for mental state recognition in brain-computer interfaces (BCI). Wireless Personal Communications, 131(3), 1569-1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10514-0 google scholar
  64. Yan, T., Wang, D., Xia, T., Liu, J., Peng, Z., & Xi, L. (2022). Investigation on optimal discriminant directions of linear discriminant analysis for locating informative frequency bands for machine health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 180, 109424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109424 google scholar
  65. Zaidi, S. A., Chouvatut, V., Phongnarisorn, C., & Praserttitipong, D. (2025). Deep learning based detection of endometriosis lesions in laparoscopic images with 5-Fold cross-validation. Intelligence-Based Medicine, 11, 100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100230 google scholar
  66. Zhai, Y., Song, W., Liu, X., Liu, L., & Zhao, X. (2018). A Chi-square statistics based feature selection method in text classification. In 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS) (pp. 149-152). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2018.8663882 google scholar