Journals / Acta Medica Alanya / 2025 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Two-Year Functional Outcomes of Peripheral Nerve Injuries Following the Earthquake

Deprem Sonrası Gelişen Periferik Sinir Yaralanmalarının İki Yıllık Fonksiyonel Sonuçları

Serkan Aydın(ankara etlik şehir hastanesi)0000-0002-3620-7041
Ahmet Acar(Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0001-8378-4346
Ömer Torun(Etlik Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-5787-3908
Günbay Noyan Dirlik(ALANYA ALAADDIN KEYKUBAT UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF MEDICINE)0000-0003-0738-6455
Pages
236–242
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Disruption of rehabilitation services in disaster settings significantly limits functional improvement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the types of peripheral nerve injuries that developed after the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes of February 6, 2023, the accompanying complications, the treatments applied and the functional outcomes obtained at the end of a two-year follow-up period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 19 patients diagnosed with peripheral nerve injury after the earthquake, who completed a 24-month follow-up.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Disruption of rehabilitation services in disaster settings significantly limits functional improvement.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Periferik sinir yaralanması · Deprem sonrası rehabilitasyon · Crush yaralanması

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the types of peripheral nerve injuries that developed after the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes of February 6, 2023, the accompanying complications, the treatments applied and the functional outcomes obtained at the end of a two-year follow-up period. The study also sought to reveal the long-term functional impact of nerve damage caused by crush injuries and compartment pressure following earthquakes. Methods: This retrospective study included 19 patients diagnosed with peripheral nerve injury after the earthquake, who completed a 24-month follow-up. Diagnoses were confirmed through physical examination, electromyography (EMG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when necessary. Data regarding the affected nerve, surgical interventions, systemic complications, orthosis use and rehabilitation processes were recorded. Functional outcomes were assessed with nerve-specific validated scales: peroneal (FAAM, AOFAS), radial (DASH), sciatic (LEFS) and brachial plexus (CSS). Results: The most frequently affected nerve was the peroneal nerve (42%), followed by sciatic, radial and brachial plexus injuries. Fasciotomy was performed in 62% of the patients and 74% underwent additional surgical procedures. Functional scores remained generally low at the end of the second year; however, patients who maintained regular rehabilitation follow-up demonstrated more notable improvement. Regression analysis showed that prolonged time under debris and undergoing fasciotomy independently predicted poorer functional outcomes. Conclusion: Peripheral nerve injuries following earthquakes may be overlooked in the acute period but can lead to long-term functional deficits. Regular follow-up, a multidisciplinary approach and uninterrupted rehabilitation are essential for optimal recovery. Disruption of rehabilitation services in disaster settings significantly limits functional improvement.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş depremleri sonrasında gelişen periferik sinir yaralanmalarının tiplerini, eşlik eden komplikasyonları, uygulanan tedavileri ve iki yıllık takip sonunda elde edilen fonksiyonel sonuçları değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Deprem sonrası crush ve kompartman basısına bağlı sinir hasarlarının uzun dönem fonksiyonel kayıp üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymak hedeflenmiştir. Yöntemler: Retrospektif olarak tasarlanan çalışmada, deprem sonrasında periferik sinir yaralanması tanısı alan ve 24 aylık takibi tamamlanan 19 hasta incelenmiştir. Tanılar fizik muayene, EMG ve gerektiğinde MRG ile doğrulanmıştır. Etkilenen sinir, uygulanan cerrahi işlemler, sistemik komplikasyonlar, ortez kullanımı ve rehabilitasyon süreci kaydedilmiştir. Fonksiyonel değerlendirme sinire özgü validasyonlu ölçeklerle yapılmıştır: peroneal (FAAM, AOFAS), radial (DASH), siyatik (LEFS) ve brakial pleksus (CSS). Bulgular: En sık peroneal sinir tutulumu (%42) saptanmıştır; ardından siyatik, radial ve brakial pleksus yaralanmaları gelmektedir. Hastaların %62’sine fasyotomi, %74’üne ek cerrahi girişimler yapılmıştır. İkinci yıl sonunda fonksiyonel skorlar genel olarak düşük seyretmiş; düzenli rehabilitasyon takibi sağlayabilen az sayıdaki hastada daha belirgin iyileşme izlenmiştir. Regresyon analizinde enkaz altında kalma süresinin artması ve fasyotomi uygulanması fonksiyonel sonuçları bağımsız olarak olumsuz etkilemiştir. Sonuç: Deprem sonrası periferik sinir yaralanmaları, erken dönemde sıklıkla gözden kaçsa da uzun süreli fonksiyonel kayıplara yol açabilmektedir. Düzenli takip, multidisipliner yaklaşım ve kesintisiz rehabilitasyon iyileşmede kritik öneme sahiptir. Afet koşullarında rehabilitasyonun sürdürülememesi fonksiyonel iyileşmeyi belirgin biçimde sınırlandırmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydın, S., Acar, A., Torun, Ö., Girgin, A. B., Dirlik, G. N. (2025). Two-Year Functional Outcomes of Peripheral Nerve Injuries Following the Earthquake. Acta Medica Alanya, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 236–242. https://doi.org/10.30565/medalanya.1829320

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Long B, Liang SY, Gottlieb M. Crush injury and syndrome: a review for emergency clinicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2023;69:180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.029.
  2. Gümüşoğlu E, Asfuroğlu ZM, Eskandari MM. Demographic and clinical features of extremity crush injuries resulting from entrapment under the rubble: an orthopedic perspective. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025;145(1):453. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06077-3.
  3. Noble J, Munro CA, Prasad VS, Midha R. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 1998;45(1):116-22. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00025.
  4. Campbell WW. Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(9):1951-65. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.018.
  5. Mackay MJ, Ayres JM, Harmon IP, Tarakemeh A, Brubacher J, Vopat BG. Traumatic peroneal nerve injuries: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2022;10(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00256.
  6. Shields RW Jr, Root KE Jr, Wilbourn AJ. Compartment syndromes and compression neuropathies in coma. Neurology. 1986;36(10):1370-4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.36.10.1370.
  7. Bilir EE, Eser F, Yurdakul FG, Yanık B, Bodur H, Alemdaroğlu E et al. Demographic and clinical profile of amputees aftermath of the 2023 Türkiye Kahramanmaraş earthquake: implications for prosthetic needs. J PMR Sci. 2025; 28(3):271-7. doi: 10.31609/jpmrs.2025-109086.
  8. Demirkiran O, Dikmen Y, Utku T, Urkmez S. Crush syndrome patients after the Marmara earthquake. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(3):247-50. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.3.247.
  9. Lu M, Wang Y, Yue L, Chiu J, He F, Wu X et al. Follow-up evaluation with ultrasonography of peripheral nerve injuries after an earthquake. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9(6):582-8. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.130095.
  10. Akbaş E, Bayramlar K. Analysis of medical rehabilitation needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake victims: Adıyaman example. Physiother Res Int. 2025;30(1):e70005. doi: 10.1002/pri.70005.
  11. Yamak T, Engez D, Gümüşyayla Ş, Vural G. Assessment of peripheral nerve injuries by electroneuromyography after Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (On February 6, 2023). Ankara Med J. 2024;24(1):72-83. doi: 10.5505/amj.2024.97957.
  12. Yalçınkaya B, Sağ BT, Aksakal MF, Analay P, Ocak H, Kara M et al. Optimal examination for traumatic nerve/muscle injuries in earthquake survivors: a retrospective observational study. J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2024;41(2):120-7. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2024.00087.
  13. Özdemir G, Karlıdağ T, Bingöl O, Sarıkaya B, Çağlar C, Bozkurt İ et al. Systematic triage and treatment of earthquake victims: our experience in a tertiary hospital after the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake. JJt Dis Relat Surg. 2023;34(2):480-7. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1102.
  14. Alaydin HC, Bozdogan GM, Paltaci R, Arlier Z, Fidanci H, Yildiz M. Neuropathic pain and mood disorders in earthquake survivors with peripheral nerve injuries. Ideggyogy Sz. 2024;77(3-4):97-102. doi: 10.18071/isz.77.0097.
  15. Taylor CA, Braza D, Rice JB, Dillingham T. The incidence of peripheral nerve injury in extremity trauma. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;87(5):381-5. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31815e6370.
  16. Varolgüneş S. A bibliometric analysis of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: trends, gaps, and policy implications. Nat Hazards. 2025;121(11):12461-85. doi: 10.1007/s11069-025-07305-0.
  17. Grinsell D, Keating CP. Peripheral nerve recontruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:698256. doi: 10.1155/2014/698256
  18. Aras Y, Aydoseli A, Sabancı PA, Akçakaya MO, Alkır G, Imer M. Functional outcomes after treatment of traumatic brachial plexus injuries: clinical study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19(6):521-8. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.48107.