SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 16 Issue: 2

Comparison of Conventional Bone Scintigraphy and Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Musculoskeletal System Metastases

KAS İSKELET SİSTEMİNDE METASTAZ TARAMASINDA KEMİK SİNTİGRAFİSİ İLE TÜM VÜCUT MANYETİK REZONANS GÖRÜNTÜLEMENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Meral Topaloğlu(Düzce Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Düzce)
Melih Engin Erkan(Düzce Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Nükleer Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Düzce)
Ramazan Büyükkaya(Düzce Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Düzce)
Halit Beşir(Düzce Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Düzce)
Burhan Yazıcı(Düzce Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Düzce)
Mustafa Özşahin(Düzce Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, Düzce)
Beşir Erdoğmuş(Düzce Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, Düzce)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2014-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The detectionsensitivity, specificity and adaptation of bone metastases were examined whit whole-bodymagnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy.Results: Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging has a higher sensitivity than bonescintigraphy for the detection of metastases.Conclusion: Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging can be used for bone metastases forscreening as an alternative imaging modality

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: In this study, the aim is to compare the findings of conventional bone scintigraphyand whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for the known primary malignancy in patientswith bone metastases.Methods: 34 patients were studied with retrospectively and prospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Purpose: In this study, the aim is to compare the findings of conventional bone scintigraphyand whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for the known primary malignancy in patientswith bone metastases.Methods: 34 patients were studied with retrospectively and prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The detectionsensitivity, specificity and adaptation of bone metastases were examined whit whole-bodymagnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy.Results: Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging has a higher sensitivity than bonescintigraphy for the detection of metastases.Conclusion: Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging can be used for bone metastases forscreening as an alternative imaging modality
🔬Design:Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Whole body MRI · metastasis · malign tumors

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the aim is to compare the findings of conventional bone scintigraphyand whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for the known primary malignancy in patientswith bone metastases.Methods: 34 patients were studied with retrospectively and prospectively. The detectionsensitivity, specificity and adaptation of bone metastases were examined whit whole-bodymagnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy.Results: Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging has a higher sensitivity than bonescintigraphy for the detection of metastases.Conclusion: Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging can be used for bone metastases forscreening as an alternative imaging modality

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda, bilinen primer malignitesi olup, kemik metastazı bulunan olgularda tümvücut magnetik rezonans görüntüleme ile konvansiyonel kemik sintigrafi bulgularınınkarşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Materyal ve Metod: 34 olgu retrospektif ve prospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Tüm vücutmagnetik rezonans görüntüleme ile kemik sintigrafisinin, kemik metastazlarını saptamadakiduyarlılık, özgüllük ve uyumları incelenmiştir.Bulguar: Tüm vücut magnetik rezonans görüntüleme, kemik sintigrafisine oranla metastazsaptamada daha yüksek bir duyarlılığa sahiptir.Sonuç: Kemik metastazının taranmasında tüm vücut magnetik rezonans görüntüleme yöntemi,kemik sintigrafisine alternatif bir görüntüleme yöntemi olarak kullanılabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

Topaloğlu, M., Erkan, M. E., Büyükkaya, R., Beşir, H., Yazıcı, B., Özşahin, M., Erdoğmuş, B. (2014). Comparison of Conventional Bone Scintigraphy and Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Musculoskeletal System Metastases. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 16 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1346818

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abrams HL, Spiro R, Goldestein A. Metastases in carcinomas. Analysis of 100 autopsied cases. Cancer. 1950;23:74-85.
  2. Edelstyn GA, Gillespie PJ, Grebbel FS. The radiological demostration of osseus metastases: experimental observations. Clin Radiol. 1967;18:158-162.
  3. Olson PN, Everson LI, Griffiths HJ. Staging of musculoskeletal tumors. Radiol Clin North Am. 1994;32:151-162.
  4. Lauenstein TC, Freudenberg LS, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Bosk S, Debatin JF, Barkhausen J. Whole-body RIM using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases. Eur Radiol. 2002;12 (8):2091-9.
  5. Hargaden G, O’Connell M, Kavanagh E, Powell T, Ward R, Eustace S. Current concepts in whole-body imaging using turbo short tau invertion recovery MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:247-252.
  6. Daldrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM, Laukamp D, Sciuk J, Jurgens H, Schober O, Rummeny EJ. Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(1):229-3,6.
  7. Ravaioli A, Tassinari D. Staging of breast cancer: recommended standards. Ann Oncol. 2000;11:3-6.
  8. Foster RS, Nichols CR. Testiculer cancer: what’s new in staging, prognosis and therapy. Oncology. 1999;13:1689-1694.
  9. Walker R, Kessar P, Blanchard R, Dimasi M, Harper K, DeCarvalho V, Yucel EK, Patriquin L, Eustace S. Turbo STIR magnetic resonance imaging as a whole-body screening tool for metastases in patients with breast carcinoma: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11(4):343- 50.
  10. Thomas L, Susanne G, Chiristoph H, Matthias G. Whole- Body MR Imaging: Evaluation of Patients for Metastases. RSNA. 2004; 139-147.
  11. Mazumdar A, Siegel MJ, Nara V, Luchtman-Jones L. Whole body fast inversion recovery MR imaging of small cell neoplasms in pediatric patients: A pilot study. Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179:1261-1266.