SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 28 Issue: 2

Mid- and Long-Term Outcomes of Tibiotalar, Triple, and Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis for Advanced Ankle Osteoarthritis

Raşit Emin Dalaslan(Düzce University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology)0000-0001-5068-8024
Mücahid Osman Yücel(Düzce University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology)0000-0002-9405-2367
Sönmez Sağlam(Düzce University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology)0000-0003-2651-8003
Mehmet Arıcan(Düzce University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology)0000-0002-0649-2339
Zekeriya Okan Karaduman(Düzce University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology)0000-0002-6719-3666
Veysel Uludağ(Düzce University, Faculty of Health Sciences)0000-0002-9911-5961
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Procedure selection should reflect joint involvement, deformity, bone quality, and patient characteristics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare mid- to long-term outcomes of tibiotalar arthrodesis (TTA), triple arthrodesis (TA), and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 32 patients who underwent arthrodesis between 2015 and 2024: TTA with cannulated screws (n=15), TA with cannulated screws and staples (n=8), or TTCA with a retrograde intramedullary nail (n=9).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Procedure selection should reflect joint involvement, deformity, bone quality, and patient characteristics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ankle osteoarthritis · tibiotalar arthrodesis · triple arthrodesis

Abstract

Aim: To compare mid- to long-term outcomes of tibiotalar arthrodesis (TTA), triple arthrodesis (TA), and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA). Outcomes included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analog scale (VAS), complications, revision, and adjacent joint osteoarthritis. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 32 patients who underwent arthrodesis between 2015 and 2024: TTA with cannulated screws (n=15), TA with cannulated screws and staples (n=8), or TTCA with a retrograde intramedullary nail (n=9). Follow-up duration was 4.0 (2.75–7.0) [1–10] years. Functional outcomes were assessed using the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS. Complications, revision surgery, and adjacent joint osteoarthritis were also evaluated. Results: AOFAS scores were comparable among groups (p=0.542), whereas VAS scores differed significantly (p=0.037). Post hoc comparisons showed lower VAS scores after TTCA than after TA (adjusted p=0.036); TTA did not differ from TA (p=0.305) or TTCA (p=0.135). Postoperative complications occurred in three TTA patients (20.0%), no TA patients, and one TTCA patient (11.1%), without a group difference (p=0.670). One TTA patient underwent revision for nonunion; revision rates were comparable (p=1.000). Adjacent joint osteoarthritis occurred in one patient. Conclusion: The procedures provided comparable AOFAS scores and low complication and revision rates. TTCA was associated with lower pain than TA, but this finding requires caution given the retrospective design, small groups, and differing indications. Procedure selection should reflect joint involvement, deformity, bone quality, and patient characteristics.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dalaslan, R. E., Yücel, M. O., Sağlam, S., Arıcan, M., Karaduman, Z. O., Uludağ, V. (2026). Mid- and Long-Term Outcomes of Tibiotalar, Triple, and Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis for Advanced Ankle Osteoarthritis. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 28 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.1890432

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Nogod S, Khairy AMM Jr, Nubi OG, Fatooh MS, Mohammed Ali Abd-Elmaged H. Ankle arthrodesis: indications, outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37177. doi:10.7759/cureus.37177.
  2. Belhan O, Gürger M. Ayak bileği artroplastisi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Orthop Traumatol Spec Top. 2009;2(1):103-6. van den Heuvel SBM, Penning D, Schepers T. Open ankle arthrodesis: a retrospective analysis comparing different fixation methods. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;61(2):233-8. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.012.
  3. Berend ME, Glisson RR, Nunley JA. A biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and crossed lag screw fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(10):639-43. doi:10.1177/107110079701801007.
  4. Savaş T, Karsli B, Kurt V, Yavuz Savaş N. A single-center comparative study: outcome analysis of fixation techniques for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45308. doi:10.7759/cureus.45308.
  5. Im J, Jung HG, Lim JW, Song WT. Ankle-hindfoot reconstruction by tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis using multiple cannulated screws: 32 cases. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022;7(1):2473011421S00259. doi:10.1177/2473011421S00259.
  6. Maier F, Wiebking U, O'Loughlin PF, Krettek C, Gaulke R. Clinical and radiological mid- to long-term results following triple arthrodesis. In Vivo. 2023;37(2):714-25. doi:10.21873/invivo.13133.
  7. Klerken T, Kosse NM, Aarts CAM, Louwerens JWK. Long-term results after triple arthrodesis: influence of alignment on ankle osteoarthritis and clinical outcome. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(2):247-50. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2017.11.003.
  8. Smith RW, Shen W, Dewitt S, Reischl SF. Triple arthrodesis in adults with non-paralytic disease. a minimum ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(12):2707-13. doi:10.2106/00004623-200412000-00018.
  9. Trost M, Yarkin S, Knieps M, Frey S, Neiss WF, Eysel P, et al. Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a cadaver study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):971. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-04444-7.
  10. Perez-Aznar A, Gonzalez-Navarro B, Bello-Tejeda LL, Alonso-Montero C, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Lopez-Prats FA. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail: a prospective cohort study at a minimum five year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2021;45(9):2299-305. doi:10.1007/s00264-020-04904-3.
  11. Thomas AE, Guyver PM, Taylor JM, Czipri M, Talbot NJ, Sharpe IT. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a compressive retrograde nail: a retrospective study of 59 nails. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;21(3):202-5. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2015.01.001.
  12. Gong JC, Zhou BH, Tao X, Yuan CS, Tang KL. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with headless compression screws. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11(1):91. doi:10.1186/s13018-016-0425-7.
  13. Zhang DX, Zhong X, Deng XD, Xiong M, Li W, Zhang SB, et al. [Clinical outcome of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion using cannulated screw and humeral proximal locking plate inverted fixation through a lateral transfibular approach]. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020;33(12):1166-70. Chinese. doi:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.12.015.
  14. Hegeman E, Dowd TC, Huh J. Outcomes following intramedullary nail vs plate fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022;7(1):2473011421S00230. doi:10.1177/2473011421S00230.
  15. Zhang C, Shi Z, Mei G. Locking plate versus retrograde intramedullary nail fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a retrospective analysis. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(2):227-32. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.152492.
  16. Rosemberg DL, Macedo RS, Sposeto RB, Sakaki MH, Godoy-Santos AL, Fernandes TD. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a retrospective comparison between nails and lateral locking plate complications. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023;8(1):24730114231157719. doi:10.1177/24730114231157719.
  17. Ozkul B, Akbulut D, Kürk MB, Albayrak K, Pehlivanoglu G, Demir B. Impact of subtalar joint debridement on fusion rates and outcomes in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20(1):408. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-05817-w.