SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 1 Special Issue

DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF HISTORICAL BAYBURT GRAND MOSQUE

Muhammet Yurdakul(Bayburt University, Department of Civil Engineering)0000-0002-3904-3206
Fatih Yılmaz(Bayburt University, Department of Civil Engineering)0000-0002-7962-9834
Musa Artar(Bayburt University, Department of Civil Engineering)0000-0003-4138-0241
Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the results of the dynamic analysis made, quantities and locations of the strains that can occur in the historic mosque are determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the locations of the damages that would occur when a historical building was exposed to different earthquakes were determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This selected historical building is modelled according to the macro modelling technique in the SAP2000 program using the finite element method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the results of the dynamic analysis made, quantities and locations of the strains that can occur in the historic mosque are determined.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Historic buildings · Bayburt stone · dynamic analysis

Abstract

In this study, the locations of the damages that would occur when a historical building was exposed to different earthquakes were determined. The selected building is Bayburt Ulu Mosque located in the city center of Bayburt and it was built by the Anatolian Seljuk Sultan II. Gıyaseddin. This selected historical building is modelled according to the macro modelling technique in the SAP2000 program using the finite element method. Modules of elasticity, poisson's ratio and weight per unit of volume of Bayburt Stone which is used in the mosque are determined by the experiment. Also, the properties of the ground on which the building was built are determined. As earthquake records which recorded on similar grounds, components of DZC180 and DZC270 of 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake, components BOL000 and BOL090 of 12 November 1999 Düzce earthquake and components of ERZE-EW and ERZE-NS of 13 March 1999 Erzincan earthquake are used. In the results of the dynamic analysis made, quantities and locations of the strains that can occur in the historic mosque are determined.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yurdakul, M., Yılmaz, F., Artar, M. (2020). DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF HISTORICAL BAYBURT GRAND MOSQUE. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 11 Issue: 1 Special Issue. https://ajindex.com/articles/1344916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. P. Yılmaz, “Tarihi Yapıların Modellenmesi ve Deprem Güvenliklerinin Belirlenmesi”, Sakarya University, Sakarya, 2006.
  2. Ö. Akdeniz, “Tarihi Yapıların Lineer Olmayan Dinamik Analizi”, Fırat University, Elazığ, 2011.
  3. B.Ş. Şeker, F. Çakır, A. Doğangün ve A. Durmuş, “Sonlu Elemanlar Yöntemiyle Tarihi Erzurum Lala Paşa Cami’nin Yapısal Davranışının İncelenmesi”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilim Dergisi, vol. 21, no 3, pp. 82-87, 2013.
  4. Ö. Mutlu, “Bursa Ulu Camii ve Yeşil Camii'nin Dinamik Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi”, Yıldız Tehcnical University, İstanbul, 2015.
  5. G. Çal, “Ortaköy Büyük Mecidiye Camii'nin Deprem Etkisi Altında Yapısal Davranışının Değerlendirilmesi”, Yıldız Tehcnical University, İstanbul, 2015.
  6. T.Tetik, “Tarihi Yığma Yapıların Deprem Performansı ve Güçlendirme Teknikleri”, Istanbul Tehcnical University, Deprem Mühendisliği ve Afet Yönetimi Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2015.
  7. H.O. Anadut, “Tarihi Yapıların Dinamik Davranışlarının İncelenmesi”, Bozok University, Yozgat, 2016.
  8. Ö. Dabanlı, “Nur-U Osmaniye Camii’nin Deprem Performansının Belirlenmesi ve Koruma Önerileri”, Istanbul Tehcnical University, İstanbul, 2016.
  9. Ates S, Atmaca B, Yildirim E and Asci Demiroz N, Effects of soil-structure interaction on construction stage analysis of highway bridges, Computers and Concrete, Vol. 12, No. 2 (2013) 169-186.
  10. “SAP2000.”, Integrated Finite Elements Analysis and Design of Structures, Computers & Structures, CALIFORNIA, 2019.
  11. A. Koçak, “Tarihi Yığma Yapıların Statik ve Dinamik Yükler Altında Lineer ve Non-Lineer Analizi: Küçük Ayasofya Camii Örneği”, Yıldız Tehcnical University, İstanbul, 1999.
  12. Ö. Dabanlı, “Tarihi Yığma Yapıların Deprem Performansının Belirlenmesi”, Yıldız Tehcnical University, İstanbul, 2008.
  13. S. Ulukaya, and N. Yüzer, “Tarihi Yapılarda Taşıyıcı Tuğla Duvarın Elastisite Modülünün Deneysel ve Matematiksel Model İle Belirlenmesi”, Uluslararası Katılımlı 6. Tarihi Yapıların Korunması ve Güçlendirilmesi Sempozyumu, 2017, pp. 539.
  14. S. Sahlin, Structural Masonry, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1971
  15. T.S. Cheema and R.E. Klinger, “Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms”, ACI Journal, vol. 83, no 1, pp. 88–97, January 1986.
  16. R.G., Drysdale, A.A. Hamid and L.R., Baker, Masonry Structures Behavior and Design, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1993.
  17. A. O. Kuruşcu, “Yığma Duvar ve Temellerde Doğrusal Olmayan Modelleme”, Yıldız Tehcnical University, İstanbul, 2012.
  18. Nafız, Çamlıbel, “Sinan Mimarlığında Yapı Strüktürünün Analitik İncelenmesi”, Doçentlik Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, 1998.
  19. ASTM D2487, Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011.
  20. Ates S, Atmaca B, Yildirim E and Asci Demiroz N, Effects of soil-structure interaction on construction stage analysis of highway bridges, Computers and Concrete, Vol. 12, No. 2 (2013) 169-186.