Journals / Sağlık ve Sosyal Refah Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 2026

RETHINKING SUSTAINABILITY IN AGEING SOCIETIES: THE ROLE OF LONG-TERM CARE EXPENDITURE IN OECD COUNTRIES

YAŞLANAN TOPLUMLARDA SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİ YENİDEN DÜŞÜNMEK: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE UZUN DÖNEM BAKIM HARCAMALARININ ROLÜ

Zeliha Köse(ALTINBAŞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, LİSANSÜSTÜ EĞİTİM ENSTİTÜSÜ, SAĞLIK YÖNETİMİ (DR))0009-0004-4979-5681
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The empirical findings indicate that both population ageing and long-term care expenditure are positively and statistically significantly associated with healthcare expenditure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Population ageing has become an important policy concern for the sustainability of healthcare systems, particularly in OECD countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to examine the relationship between population ageing, long-term care expenditure, and healthcare expenditure using panel data from 33 OECD countries covering the period 2000–2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The empirical findings indicate that both population ageing and long-term care expenditure are positively and statistically significantly associated with healthcare expenditure.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2000–2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Nüfus yaşlanması · uzun dönem bakım · sağlık harcamaları

Abstract

Population ageing has become an important policy concern for the sustainability of healthcare systems, particularly in OECD countries. Although the relationship between ageing and healthcare expenditure has been widely examined in the literature, the association between long-term care expenditure and healthcare expenditure has received relatively limited attention. This study aims to examine the relationship between population ageing, long-term care expenditure, and healthcare expenditure using panel data from 33 OECD countries covering the period 2000–2023. The analysis employs panel data techniques, including pooled Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Fixed Effects, and Random Effects models, together with several diagnostic tests. The empirical findings indicate that both population ageing and long-term care expenditure are positively and statistically significantly associated with healthcare expenditure. According to the final model, a 1% increase in the proportion of the population aged 65 and above is associated with an approximately 0.32% increase in healthcare expenditure. Similarly, a 1% increase in long-term care expenditure is associated with an approximately 0.08% increase in healthcare expenditure. In contrast, GDP per capita was not found to be statistically significant. The results also reveal significant cross-sectional dependence among countries. Overall, the study suggests that healthcare expenditure in ageing societies may be associated with both demographic and institutional factors and highlights the importance of considering long-term care systems when evaluating healthcare system sustainability.

Özet

Nüfusun yaşlanması, özellikle OECD ülkelerinde sağlık sistemlerinin sürdürülebilirliği açısından önemli bir politika alanı haline gelmiştir. Yaşlanma ile sağlık harcamaları arasındaki ilişki literatürde geniş ölçüde incelenmiş olmasına rağmen, uzun dönem bakım harcamalarının sağlık harcamaları ile ilişkisi sınırlı düzeyde ele alınmıştır. Bu çalışma, 2000–2023 döneminde 33 OECD ülkesine ait panel veri kullanarak nüfus yaşlanması ve uzun dönem bakım harcamalarının sağlık harcamaları ile ilişkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada panel veri yöntemleri kullanılmış; havuzlanmış En Küçük Kareler (OLS), sabit etkiler ve rassal etkiler modelleri tahmin edilmiş, ayrıca çeşitli tanısal testler uygulanmıştır. Bulgular hem nüfus yaşlanmasının hem de uzun dönem bakım harcamalarının sağlık harcamaları ile pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Nihai model sonuçlarına göre, nüfusun 65 yaş ve üzerindeki payındaki %1’lik artış sağlık harcamalarında yaklaşık %0,32’lik bir artış ile ilişkilidir. Benzer şekilde, uzun dönem bakım harcamalarındaki %1’lik artış sağlık harcamalarında yaklaşık %0,08’lik bir artış ile ilişkilidir. Buna karşılık, kişi başına düşen gelir değişkeninin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca ülkeler arasında anlamlı düzeyde yatay kesit bağımlılığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak çalışma, sağlık harcamalarının yaşlanan toplumlarda hem demografik hem de kurumsal faktörlerle ilişkili olduğunu göstermekte ve sağlık sistemi sürdürülebilirliğinin değerlendirilmesinde uzun dönem bakım sistemlerinin dikkate alınmasının önemine işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Köse, Z. (2026). RETHINKING SUSTAINABILITY IN AGEING SOCIETIES: THE ROLE OF LONG-TERM CARE EXPENDITURE IN OECD COUNTRIES. Sağlık ve Sosyal Refah Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 2026. https://doi.org/10.55050/sarad.1932239

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Canada: What are the equity implications? Social Science & Medicine, 70(3), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.027
  2. Alves da Costa, F., Teixeira, I., & Cabrita, J. (2017). Effects of economic recession on elderly patients' perceptions of access to health care and medicines in Portugal. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 39(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0411-8
  3. Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137284
  4. Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data (6th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 53953-5
  5. Breyer, F., Lorenz, N., & Niebel, T. (2015). Health care expenditures and longevity: Is there a Eubie Blake effect? The European Journal of Health Economics, 16(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-013-0555-2
  6. Cabañero-García, E., Martínez-Lacoba, R., Pardo-García, I., & Amo-Saus, E. (2025). Barriers to health, social and long-term care access among older adults: A systematic review of reviews. International Journal for Equity in Health, 24(1), Article 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02429-y.
  7. Colombo, F., Llena-Nozal, A., Mercier, J., & Tjadens, F. (2011). Help wanted? Providing and paying for longterm care. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264097759-en
  8. Costa-Font, J., & Vilaplana, C. (2017). Financing long-term care: Ex ante, ex post or both? Health Economics, 26(S1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3532
  9. de la Maisonneuve, C., & Oliveira Martins, J. (2013). Public spending on health and long-term care: A new set of projections (OECD Economic Policy Papers No. 6). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k44t7jwwr9x-en
  10. Dormont, B., Grignon, M., & Huber, H. (2010). Health expenditure growth: Reassessing the threat of ageing. Health Economics, 19(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1485
  11. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  12. European Commission. (2021). The 2021 ageing report: Economic and budgetary projections for the EU Member States (2019–2070). Publications Office of the European Union.
  13. Getzen, T. E. (2000). Health care is an individual necessity and a national luxury: Applying multilevel decision models to the analysis of health care expenditures. Journal of Health Economics, 19(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(99)00032-6
  14. Gibson, G., Grignon, M., Hurley, J., & Wang, L. (2019). Here comes the SUN: Self-assessed unmet need, worsening health outcomes, and health care inequity. Health Economics, 28(6), 727–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3883
  15. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
  16. HelpAge International. (2015). Ageing and health: A global perspective. HelpAge International.
  17. Herr, M., Arvieu, J. J., Robine, J. M., & Ankri, J. (2014). Unmet health care needs of older people: Prevalence and predictors in a French national survey. European Journal of Ageing, 11(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-013-0304-4
  18. Köse, Z. (2026). Policy gaps in ageing societies: A comparative analysis of healthcare access among older adults in OECD countries. International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 11(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.1933545
  19. Levesque, J. F., Harris, M. F., & Russell, G. (2013). Patient-centred access to health care: Conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-18
  20. Mede, M., Erkoç, A., Köse, Z. (2026). Preparing for ageing: Healthcare system capacity and workforce adaptation in OECD countries. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 58–68.
  21. Mueller, M., Bourke, E., & Morgan, D. (2020). Assessing the comparability of long-term care spending estimates under the Joint Health Accounts Questionnaire. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/topics/policy-issue-focus/sha-guidelines/LTC-JQ.pdf
  22. Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913646
  23. OECD. (2021). Health at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ae3016b9- en
  24. OECD. (2023). Health at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
  25. OECD. (2023). OECD Health Statistics. https://stats.oecd.org/
  26. OECD. (2025). Health at a glance 2025: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
  27. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross-section dependence in panels (Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435). University of Cambridge. https://doi.org
  28. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  29. Rechel, B., Doyle, Y., Grundy, E., & McKee, M. (2013). How can health systems respond to population ageing? World Health Organization.
  30. Saurman, E. (2016). Improving access: Modifying Penchansky and Thomas's theory of access. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819615600001
  31. Wagstaff, A., & van Doorslaer, E. (2003). Catastrophe and impoverishment in paying for health care: With applications to Vietnam 1993–1998. Health Economics, 12(11), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.776
  32. Westerlund, J. (2005). New simple tests for panel cointegration. Econometric Reviews, 24(3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500243019
  33. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
  34. World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/
  35. World Health Organization. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization.
  36. World Health Organization. (2020). Decade of healthy ageing 2021–2030. World Health Organization.
  37. World Health Organization, & World Bank. (2022). Tracking universal health coverage: 2021 global monitoring report. World Health Organization.
  38. Xu, K., Soucat, A., & Kutzin, J. (2018). Public spending on health: A closer look at global trends. World Health Organization.
  39. Zweifel, P., Felder, S., & Meiers, M. (1999). Ageing of population and health care expenditure: A red herring? Health Economics, 8(6), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199909)8:6 3.0.CO;2-4