Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Alternative Fuel Characteristics for Internal Combustion Engines with Analytical Hierarchy Process

Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesiyle İçten Yanmalı Motorlar İçin Alternatif Yakıt Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
21–34
Publication Date
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The applied model presents quantitative conclusions that can contribute to enhance the decision-making progression.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For a long time, the diesel and gasoline have been utilized as fuel for internal combustion engines.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is generally a challenging task for decision makers to determine the best feasible fuel for internal combustion engines among multiple choices because of the complicated task of considering various attributes of performances and the lack of information available.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The applied model presents quantitative conclusions that can contribute to enhance the decision-making progression.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Alternative Fuel · internal combustion engines · biofuel

Abstract

For a long time, the diesel and gasoline have been utilized as fuel for internal combustion engines. But the diminishing oil supplies along with the variable oil prices drive people to obtain alternative sources for fuel. The sustainable fuel options may alter power consumption that results in less pollution, less carbon and more variety of fuel supply. It is generally a challenging task for decision makers to determine the best feasible fuel for internal combustion engines among multiple choices because of the complicated task of considering various attributes of performances and the lack of information available. However, the right choice of the most feasible fuel option for internal combustion engines can efficiently mitigate serious environmental troubles and over-consumption of energy during transportation.In this study, the diverse types of liquid fuel options for internal combustion engines are compared in terms of critical characteristics determined within the scope of this research. In this article, the quantitative evaluation model utilized provides decision makers with a tool to be utilized during important strategic decision-making processes on issues with regard to fuel policy in the near future. The applied model presents quantitative conclusions that can contribute to enhance the decision-making progression.

Özet

Uzun süredir içten yanmalı motorlarda benzin ve motorin yakıt olarak kullanılmaktadır. Ancak değişken yağ fiyatlarının yanısıra azalan yakıt kaynakları insanları alternative yakıt kaynakları edinmeye itmektedir. Sürdürülebilir yakıtlar, havayı daha az kirleten, daha az karbon salınımına yol açan güç tüketimini değiştirebilen çeşitli yakıtlardır. Otoriteler yakıtların performansı ve özellikleri hakkındaki bilgi eksikliği nedeniyle içten yanmalı motorların alternatif yakıtları için karar vermekte zorlanmaktadırlar. Bununla birlikte, içten yanmalı motorlar için en uygun yakıt seçeneğinin doğru seçimi, nakliye sırasında ciddi çevresel sorunları ve aşırı enerji tüketimini etkili bir şekilde azaltabilir.Bu çalışmada, değişik tipteki sıvı yakıt seçeneklerinden hangisinin içten yanmalı motorlar için uygun olduğu değerlendirilmiştir. Bu makalede, kullanılan nicel değerlendirme modeli, karar vericilere yakın gelecekte akaryakıt politikası ile ilgili konularda önemli stratejik karar alma süreçlerinde kullanılacak bir araç sunmaktadır. Uygulanan model, karar alma sürecinin ilerlemesine katkıda bulunabilecek nicel sonuçlar vermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYINDIR, H. (2019). Evaluation of Alternative Fuel Characteristics for Internal Combustion Engines with Analytical Hierarchy Process. Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 21–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/134325

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abdullah, L., Najib, L., 2016. Sustainable energy planning decision using the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: choosing energy technology in Malaysia. Int. J. Sustain. Energ. 35: (4), 360–377. Accessed: http://www.methanol.org/Energy/Resources/Alternative--‐Fuel/Alt--‐Fuel--‐Properties.aspx American Petroleum Institute (API), Alcohols and Ethers, Publication No.4261, 3rd ed. (Washington, DC, June 2001), Table 2. American Petroleum Institute (API), 2001.
  2. Alcohols and Ethers, Publication No.4261, 3rd ed. (Washington, DC, June), Table B-1. Balo, F., Yucel H.L., 2013. Assessment of thermal performance of green building materials produced with plant oils, International Journal of Material Science (IJMSCI) 3 September (3): 118-129.
  3. Balo, F., 2010. Development of the insulation materials from coal fly ash, perlite, clay and linseed oil, Ceramics-Silikaty 54: (2), 182-191
  4. Beer, T., Grant, T., Morgan, G,. Lapszewicz, J., Anyon, P., Edwards, J., Nelson, P., Watson, H., & Williams, D., 2011. Comparison of Transport Fuels on the Stage 2 Study of Life-Cycle Emissions Analysis of Alternative Fuels for Heavy Vehicles, Australian Greenhouse Offıce, Southern Cross Institute of Health Research, (EV45A/2/F3C), Book, Melbourne University Brey, J.J., Contreras, I., Carazo, A.F., Brey, R., Hernandez-Diaz, A,G,, Castro, A., 2007 Evaluation of automobiles with alternative fuels utilizing multi criteria techniques. J Power Sources 169: 213–9. Clean cities alernative fuel price report, 2017.
  5. Department of energy, Energy efficiency &renewable energy, July. Demirbas, A., 2017. Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass, Applied Energy 2011; 88:17–28
  6. DOE Stanford University, College of the desert and green econometric research Energy Information Administration (EIA),2006a. Monthly Energy Review. Summary for 2006. Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2016b. International Energy Outlook, 2016. U.S. Energy Information Administration (last retrieved on February 2, 2017).
  7. Fazeli, R., Leal, V., Sousa, J.P., 2011. A multi-criteria evaluation framework for alternative light-duty vehicles technologies. Int J Multicrit Decis Making 1: 230–51.
  8. Festel, G., Würmseher, M., Rammer, C., Boles, E., Bellof, M., 2014. Modeling production cost scenarios for biofuels and fossil fuels in Europe. J Clean Prod 66(0): 242-253.
  9. Frank, E.D., Han, J., Palou-Rivera, I., Elgowainy, A., Wang, M.Q. 2011. Life-cycle analysis of algal lipid fuels w